Sollte eigentlich "Kaltfrontokklusion" heißen. Der Text ist auch in der Bilddatei (Überschrift mit hinterlegten Wolken) zur Kaltfrontokklusion falsch geschrieben --Tahome
aaah! Da passt die Tatsache, dass ich die Quelldateien nicht mehr finde, ja perfekt dazu. Danke, hab das selber nicht gesehen. Vielleicht finde ich ja irgendwo doch noch etwas. – Simon / ?!15:42, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Original-XCF-Datei ist weg. Darum bis jetzt noch nicht geändert. Vielleicht mach ich das mal ganz neu. – Simon / ?!11:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Nevermind, Nein, die sind wohl endgültig verschollen. Die Zeichnung habe ich jedoch noch, denke ich, und ausserdem habe ich mir gerade ein dickes PostIt auf den Bildschirm geklebt als Erinnerung, dass ich die Bilder jetzt neu mache, auch mit korrekter Wetterkarte. Danke für den Hinweis! – Simon / ?!12:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, solltest Du derjenige sein, der mir den Hinweis auf meiner Talkpage gegeben hat, schau bitte nochmals kurz auf meinen Kommentar dazu auf meine Talkpage. Falls die Nachricht nicht von Dir kommen sollte, lösche bitte einfach diese Nachfrage --Llez (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Hi,
I am from Malaysia & I am an editor. I would like to use one of your photo of File:Sharpening Angle Guide.jpeg in the school textbook. I will credit you in the book, please advice on how I should put it. Please email me at jouehuey.yeoh@pearson.com
Regards, Joue Huey
Hello Eugene,
I'm seeking permission to use your pictogram of the running man on our logo for a fitness class. The fitness class is for 60+year olds and I intend to use the logo on their polo shirts. The polo shirts will be bought by me and sold to the participants at cost price- we are a non for profit organisation- ECH Inc Greenacres- Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Please contact me at mpivetta@ech.asn.au for your opinion and possible approval
Could you tell me whether the following statement corresponds to your expectations for a publication in my next book in French-speaking countries, or if it lacks an element declaration :
Btw, just saw that you are interested in pines. I'm writing an identification tool for trees as my master thesis. Are you interested in identifcation? I should soon have an early beta where feedback is precious. – Simon / ?!11:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Laser pointer green with Rayleigh (crop).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.
Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Auf der Suche nach Wolkenbildern bin ich auf deine Fotos gestoßen und war wirklich beeindruckt - nicht nur von den Wolken. Vielen Dank für die vielen tollen Fotos, die du hier im Laufe der Jahre hochgeladen hast! Tkarcher (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo LivingShadow,
ich bin auf Dein Foto zur Kiefernspannerraupe (Bupalus piniaria) gestoßen. Ich habe selber so eine Raupe fotografiert. Diese sieht aber ziemlich anders aus. Du kannst ja mal die Fotos zu Bupalus piniaria auf www.lepiforum.de anschauen. Vielleicht findest Du ja bei einer anderen Art die Raupe?! Dort kann man übrigens auch im Forum 1 eine Bestimmungsanfrage mit einem hochgeladenen Foto (spezielles Format - siehe dortige Webseite) stellen.
Viele Grüße,--Slimguy (talk) 18:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wiki-Kugel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
★An image you created has been reviewed and promoted★ Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Double-edge safety razors.
review
Support per nom. I was surprised how many images of razors there are in Commons. IMO the focus stacking and careful composition shown in this one is the better of the two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GRDN711 (talk • contribs)
Hello LivingShadow and apologies to bother you. I am writing you on this project as you have most recently been active here. Could you please take a look at this change and review it? Thank you! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, könnest du bitte bei diesem Bild noch Mal vorbeischauen und eine möglichst genaue Ortsangabe ergänzen, bestenfalls sogar die Koordinaten? Danke Lukas Beck (talk) 11:51, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]