User talk:Sikander/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
![]() |
File:The twins laugh at something they are watching at our campsite (50094290861).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Governor Sheng (talk) 02:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Seminar on cooperation between Finland and Estonia 15.11.2022 (52501795003).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- That's a shame, I really liked how the
Ukraine gov had their own {{President.gov.ua}} template. // sikander { talk } 🦖 14:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Toys for Tots 2022 (52553483518).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Heber Down Conservation Area - 201712 - (IMG 4438).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Cineplex Empress Walk cinemas - 20230108.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Belbury (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Gtk-dialog-info.svg/50px-Gtk-dialog-info.svg.png)
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
For your Flickr uploads… You don’t stop appearing to me on the Latest files! ![]() |
![]() |
File:Amazon Go - Seattle (20180804111434).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Mud Fest 2008 (2658549770).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Copeland Forest (20181216130924).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Mud Fest 2008 (2666728679).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 15:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/84/Holy_SURP_Hovhannes_Church.jpg/220px-Holy_SURP_Hovhannes_Church.jpg)
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d4/POTY_barnstar.svg/140px-POTY_barnstar.svg.png)
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Oregon City Track & field - IMG 8818 (52865712870).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Re-creation
It seems that someone had re-created previously deleted content at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:People signing condolence books for Elizabeth II. Is it possible for you to snap {{SD|G4}} on those files? A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- so you now lets someone else do your dirty job?..someone who themselves doesn't understand copyrights?... Stemoc 16:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Stemoc: Huh, what are you talking about? The files are tagged as "David Parry/PA Media Assignments" and "Jonathan Hordle/PA Media Assignments" and are not copyright free and were reviewed previously by Admins and deleted because of that. Please educate here Commons:Copyright rules. Cheers. // sikander { talk } 🦖 16:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter what its tagged as, its the source that matters, maybe you haven't been following the current drama created by AlCafel, maybe educate yourself first...be his scapegoat then...its your choice.. Stemoc 17:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Stemoc: Seems like you are claiming to be more knowledgeable than Commons Admins ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ // sikander { talk } 🦖 17:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- commons admins on this project don't actually do due-diligence, do they? ..one person says delete in a DR, they delete..unfortunately the bar is too low to be an admin now...knowledge of policies isn't a requirement apparently..he is trying to get you to speedy delete something that should go through DR as a similar DR he ran involving another photoset of the FCDO on their flickr backfired on him and he is now doubling-down but because he knows if he did it, he will get blocked for good, he found himself a ..well for a better word, a patsy. I assume he messaged you to file the DR but you did it wrong so he did it for you and then realised he can't leave trails so he told you to speedy them?.....yeah mate...its called scapegoating... Stemoc 17:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Stemoc: OK, so I'm wrong, A1Cafel is wrong, Admins Fitindia and Túrelio who deleted these files previously are wrong, but you are right and these files should be kept on Commons. My suggestion is that you should start requests here Commons:License review/Requests and Commons:Administrators/Requests here to fix things. Good luck. // sikander { talk } 🦖 18:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- no, you are misinformed, Fitindia didn't do due-diligence and Turelio only saw that it was deleted previously and followed suit, that DR was a farce. A1Cafel has a habit of filing many of those and it ends up creating a bad precedent because unfortunately admins on this project do not follow due diligence, if you don't know what that term means, it means to form their own judgement regardless of the votes after doing a thorough investigation cause majority of people who vote in this DR honestly know nothing about copyrights on this project as well. A1Cafel basically alleged that a UK Govt department laundered license of images it does not own copyrights too which is completely false, you can make those allegations against images that gets taken from flickr accounts of individuals, not government arms. He has done that a few too many times and not just the UK government. His lack of understanding makes him a dangerous individual, but alas admins here refuse to acknowledge the problem here let alone fix it. Not only does he mass-report stuff without even doing his own investigation, he mass-uploads from flickr as well, majority of which fails our own project copyright laws, just look at his talk page (he also removes a lot of Speedy/DR notices against his own uploads regularly) so why would you assume he knows what he is doing? I'm already a licence reviewer and i'm telling you he is wrong. I have directly dealt with the UK government before and the UKMoD.. he may have gotten a lot of free images deleted over the years due to lack of understanding and this project unfortunately has far too many new admins who themselves don't understand copyright policies, remember knowing copyright policies has never been a requirement for being an admin here... Stemoc 07:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Stemoc: Thank you for explaining meanings of words. Can I ping you when I need English help? As for the rest of your spiel I suggest taking your concerns and complaints to Jimbo. Everyone else seems to be incompetent idiots and will be unable to help you. Good day. // sikander { talk } 🦖 12:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- no, you are misinformed, Fitindia didn't do due-diligence and Turelio only saw that it was deleted previously and followed suit, that DR was a farce. A1Cafel has a habit of filing many of those and it ends up creating a bad precedent because unfortunately admins on this project do not follow due diligence, if you don't know what that term means, it means to form their own judgement regardless of the votes after doing a thorough investigation cause majority of people who vote in this DR honestly know nothing about copyrights on this project as well. A1Cafel basically alleged that a UK Govt department laundered license of images it does not own copyrights too which is completely false, you can make those allegations against images that gets taken from flickr accounts of individuals, not government arms. He has done that a few too many times and not just the UK government. His lack of understanding makes him a dangerous individual, but alas admins here refuse to acknowledge the problem here let alone fix it. Not only does he mass-report stuff without even doing his own investigation, he mass-uploads from flickr as well, majority of which fails our own project copyright laws, just look at his talk page (he also removes a lot of Speedy/DR notices against his own uploads regularly) so why would you assume he knows what he is doing? I'm already a licence reviewer and i'm telling you he is wrong. I have directly dealt with the UK government before and the UKMoD.. he may have gotten a lot of free images deleted over the years due to lack of understanding and this project unfortunately has far too many new admins who themselves don't understand copyright policies, remember knowing copyright policies has never been a requirement for being an admin here... Stemoc 07:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Stemoc: OK, so I'm wrong, A1Cafel is wrong, Admins Fitindia and Túrelio who deleted these files previously are wrong, but you are right and these files should be kept on Commons. My suggestion is that you should start requests here Commons:License review/Requests and Commons:Administrators/Requests here to fix things. Good luck. // sikander { talk } 🦖 18:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- commons admins on this project don't actually do due-diligence, do they? ..one person says delete in a DR, they delete..unfortunately the bar is too low to be an admin now...knowledge of policies isn't a requirement apparently..he is trying to get you to speedy delete something that should go through DR as a similar DR he ran involving another photoset of the FCDO on their flickr backfired on him and he is now doubling-down but because he knows if he did it, he will get blocked for good, he found himself a ..well for a better word, a patsy. I assume he messaged you to file the DR but you did it wrong so he did it for you and then realised he can't leave trails so he told you to speedy them?.....yeah mate...its called scapegoating... Stemoc 17:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Stemoc: Seems like you are claiming to be more knowledgeable than Commons Admins ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ // sikander { talk } 🦖 17:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter what its tagged as, its the source that matters, maybe you haven't been following the current drama created by AlCafel, maybe educate yourself first...be his scapegoat then...its your choice.. Stemoc 17:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Stemoc: Huh, what are you talking about? The files are tagged as "David Parry/PA Media Assignments" and "Jonathan Hordle/PA Media Assignments" and are not copyright free and were reviewed previously by Admins and deleted because of that. Please educate here Commons:Copyright rules. Cheers. // sikander { talk } 🦖 16:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nguyễn Xuân Phúc - 2016 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Air Canada - Boeing 787-9 - Toronto to Seoul - 20230615 - 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jennifer McKelvie at Collision 2019 (47842559552) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
206.130.173.49 14:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Brigitte Macron
Hey, why did you remove some files from Category:Brigitte Macron in 2023? RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- @RodRabelo7: Hi! The same files were in Category:Brigitte Macron and Rosângela Lula da Silva and it was duplicating categories in "in 2023" on both. Although now that I think about it, Rosângela Lula da Silva and Brigitte Macron can meet up again after 2023 so may be that wasn't a good idea. I'll revert. // sikander { talk } 🦖 15:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:20230712 Rionegro Feria Aeronautica-Juan Cano05511 (53041234592).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:09.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53118016789).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ooligan (talk) 15:48, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gliére, Schumann y Stravisnky, por la Sinfónica Juvenil San Martín (53092626908).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Madamebiblio (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:06.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53117788276).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:08.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53118016864).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:07.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53118222775).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:11a.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53118311458).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:10a.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53117215382).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jess Wade - 2017.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jess Wade - 2017.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Beccaynr (talk) 12:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Jess Wade - 2017 (cropped).jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jess Wade - 2017 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Beccaynr (talk) 13:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jess Wade - 2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Brampton dates
Hi there. I noticed you were processing some Brampton-related files and adding year categories to them. For convenience, I've added 'Brampton' to {{CanadaYear}} and {{CanadaDecade}}, and created some of the necessary categories in Category:History of Brampton. Mindmatrix 18:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Mindmatrix: That's great, thank you! // sikander { talk } 🦖 18:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Since you did not respond to my reply on my talk page, I'll leave a note here.
Your comment on my talk page: User talk:Ooligan#Holding category
You wrote, "The holding category idea is one I've found useful to easily find files that I want to work on later, and thought it might be useful to mention."
I looked at your holding category. I had already added some categories in July, to the many files being held in the your "holding" category, that you had created back in December 2022 Category:2022 United Nations Biodiversity Conference.
Let me know, if you need some more help categorizing, since those files were uploaded by you a year ago.
Also, since you mentioned Commons:Flickypedia, Flickr2Commons (F2C) will not be used by the Commons:Flickypedia project-
Quoted here:
- "=== A tribute to Flickr2Commons === When we began to design the partnership, we had hoped to “adopt” Flickr2Commons and extend it. In June, we took a good look at the source code in consultation with Magnus Manske and figured out it probably wouldn’t stand up to being extended as it is without significant time invested to stabilise it. The preparation we did for this in June—trying and failing to run the source code locally, for example—indicates that it may be more robust to create a fresh version on the shoulders of Flickr2Commons." (emphasis added) Thanks again,--Ooligan (talk) 00:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
@Ooligan: Hey, thanks for adding cats to "United Nations Biodiversity Conference." Flickypedia is a work-in-progress inspired by Flickr2Commons and I wish them all the best. It's great to see people devoting time and effort to make it easier to transfer from Flickr. Cheers. // sikander { talk } 🦖 14:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
MSC - Munich Security Conference photo uploads
![]() |
File:Bilawal Bhutto Zardari at Munich Security Conference - 2023 (PGB9907).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:Park Jin at Munich Security Conference - 2023 (AB15905).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:Mélanie Joly at Munich Security Conference - 2023 (AB15962).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:Mélanie Joly at Munich Security Conference - 2023 (AB15962) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:Mélanie Joly at Munich Security Conference - 2023 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:Bilawal Bhutto Zardari at Munich Security Conference - 2023 (PGB9907) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 14:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, didn't know they switched license from CC BY 3.0 DE to non-commercial use. That's unfortunate. // sikander { talk } 🦖 15:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Seasonal Greetings!
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
Hello Sikander, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: Thank you! Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to you too. // sikander { talk } 🦖 22:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)