User talk:Shikku27316

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Shikku27316!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Heterosexual flag.png

It may seem logical to you, but unfortunately many will associate it with prison uniforms or crosswalks or zebras, rather than with heterosexuality. Few would intuitively understand it without explanation or context, and some might not appreciate the symbolism of the implied contrast with the rainbow flag. AnonMoos (talk) 04:08, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

I think you've misunderstood me -- I'm not at all "offended" by it, and I don't want it deleted (I wouldn't have uploaded a version with improved PNG compression if I wanted it deleted), and I don't have any unilateral power to delete anything. I was just pointing out, as an informal and uncredentialled student of symbolism, some of the factors which might prevent it from gaining wide acceptance (what usage it has now seems to be from people who start with the gay flag and consider how to hetero it up, which is probably not how the majority of the population would approach such symbolisms). Currently, the male and female symbols together (e.g. File:HeteroSym-pinkblue2.svg and slight variations) seem to be far more common in quasi-mainstream media uses than any flag... AnonMoos (talk) 03:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm just a patroller and filemover here, which is fairly low on the hierarchy, and even admins can't restrict people arbitrarily according to purely personal inclinations, so I can't directly forbid you from doing anything.

As for Sexual identity symbols, I was just restoring caption changes which didn't seem to be improvements, or which I didn't understand. I don't understand what the difference between "romantic asexualism" and "demisexualism" is. As for "AVEN triangle", if it's just the logo of one particular organization, and doesn't have any larger meaning or symbolism, then it wouldn't belong on the "Sexual identity symbols" page. AnonMoos (talk) 03:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

P.S. How about renaming it to "Heterosexual dichotomy flag.png"? I'm a filemover, so that's one thing I actually can do (if you agree)... AnonMoos (talk) 04:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Pennsylvania German Flag.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pennsylvania German Flag.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 03:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Harassment

You have been reported on the Administrators' noticeboard regarding your harassments and disruptive behaviour. Thanks.--Никола ^{Стоіаноски} 19:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Please remain calm and collegial

---

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

Using an ethnic slur against another user as you did here is unacceptable. Please refrain from commenting on the user, and comment on the topic you're discussing instead. I've protected Linguistic flags temporarily to prevent further reverts. Please address the issue of sourcing for your changes which has been brought up at Talk:Linguistic flags. INeverCry 19:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

°Д•"

I have removed your editing privileges because, despite being warned numerous times to stop your disruptive editing, you have elected to continuously ignore both our advice and our policies. Since dealing with you at this point would be complete waste of everyone's time, you are blocked until you decide you are ready to edit in a productive and collegial manner. -FASTILY 03:53, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Blocked?! Sizzling circuits! If you're referring to the recent "Deleeeete" spree over at Wikipedia, that was a neighbour who we had to watch for the day who went out of control on my Wikipedia account because I didn't log out. If this is about ethnic slurs or saying "analbeads", sorry. I never said an ethnic slur (it's not an ethnic slur). You deleted the one page without any discussion other than "it have prõblem". So I wrote my opinion. I don't recall being disruptive myself. Well, I can still edit my userpage (I hope?) and that's the only reason I got an account here anyway ^^. Well, I hope you people can understand that people have opinions and different ways of voicing them. You're actually the uncoöperative ones. ^^ Have a wonderful day!

Oh, and I was thinking about apologising for the "ethnic slur", but now I can't D: oh well. Byes!--Shikku27316 (talk) 04:06, 11 July 2013 (UTC)`

So, can you unblock me now? You seem to be here a lot. I'm sure you saw my above message. Please reread it and we can have a discussion. Or give me your e-mail. Thanks. --Shikku27316 (talk)`

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "If you're referring to the recent "Deleeeete" spree over at Wikipedia, that was a neighbour who we had to watch for the day who went out of control on my Wikipedia account because I didn't log out. If this is about ethnic slurs or saying "analbeads", sorry. I never said an ethnic slur (it's not an ethnic slur). You deleted the one page without any discussion other than "it have prõblem". So I wrote my opinion. I don't recall being disruptive myself. Well, I can still edit my userpage (I hope?) and that's the only reason I got an account here anyway ^^. Well, I hope you people can understand that people have opinions and different ways of voicing them. You're actually the uncoöperative ones. I was thinking about apologising for the "ethnic slur", but now I can't. Oh well!" Decline reason: "User didn't learn from block, continued disruptive editing after request for unblock. Needs to grow up first. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:52, 29 July 2013 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

I put the template up after writing "Analbeadz" below. Also, unblock my cousin, she did nothing wrong. --Shikku27316 (talk) 03:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)`

This

Okay, let's talk here. First of all, I didn't insult you, you said my pictures were "crayon pics", so I said that too. Also, the way you said "To make this EASY for you" was kind of insulting. Un-delete my pictures, I gave you the sources. I can't put your crayon pics up for deletion, I have no way to do that. Again, I did not insult you, so you can't use that to say I shouldn't be unblocked. I think I can be unblocked now. And my pictures aren't all nonsense. You only deleted them because you hate me. You haven't even gotten to File:Belarus flag.png because you don't hate the uploader. I can be unblocked now. If anyone deserves to be blocked, it's you-you deleted all my files with no good reason, you won't listen to me, you won't get to the point, and you've never uploaded any useful files to Wikimedia Commons. Please respond about these comments, thank you. --Shikku27316 (talk) 18:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)`

No, I don't hate you. Why should I? I have other things to do. So, I need to be blocked and that is the point why you should be unblocked? You really need to grow up. Read abot the projects and learn. That you can do without an account. I will not override the administrator who blocked you for, I quote: Disruptive Editing: Gross incompetence, does not understand policies, makes personal attacks, and refuses to get the point. Blocked until user decides to grow up and edit collegially. I will not reply to any of your comments from now on. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 22:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

I said you should be blocked, but that has nothing to do with why I should be unblocked. My reasons for why you should be blocked had nothing to do with my block. Also, avoiding me shows that you're not grown up, you know. You also won't get to the point, another reason why I was blocked, because you're not saying, "Oh, these are good reasons to be unblocked" or "these aren't good reasons to be unblocked." Also, how should I prove that I'm ready to be unblocked? I'm being patient and grown up with you, I'm getting to the point, I haven't personally attacked you or anyone since the block, and I'm less "incompetent" than you are being with me, so what else should I do? I'd like it if you'd respond, I'm bringing up goos points, and avoiding me is not grown up. Thanks. --Shikku27316 (talk) 02:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)`

Date today.

--Shikku27316 (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)`

It appears to be 21:03, july 12th. Tomorrowx!!!!"':;/,?.+()0987654321@#£%&*-+

Unblock

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Here, let's outline this: Gross incompetence: I'm not really bothering anyone. I'd like to be more "competent", not sure how I can prove that without actually having a chance. Does not understand policies: I understand them now, and I've been following them since the block. Makes personal attacks: I never really did, and haven't even come close since the block. I was thinking of apologising for the "ethnic slur", but now I can't. Interestingly, I have received two personal attacks since the block. Refuses to get to the point: Again, I really don't remember this happening, but since the block, I've stayed focused on the point of all conversations I've had. However, the admin I talked with failed to do this. Not grown up: I'm being civil and grown up with the admins, and I'm being very patient. Again, that admin is not being grown up, becuase he's ignoring me, rather than getting to the point. Edit collegially: I basically had all my uploads removed with no good reason other than "You're blocked, so your uploads contain anthrax", so if I'm unblocked, I can re-upload them. I have a lot of things I can edit. I think I've done pretty good, if you will listen, maybe you can talk with me, then I can get productive again. At least give me a second chance, to prove this to all of you. --Shikku27316 (talk) 17:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)`" Decline reason: "I can't deduce any evidence that supports you getting unblocked at this point. You may want to try waiting a month or so to see if things cool down. --O (谈 • висчвын) 06:52, 04 August 2013 (GMT)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

But I was blocked for about a month, and I can show you the conversations I had with Hedwig in Washington on here and Wikipedia. I think I'm good now. --Shikku27316 (talk) 18:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)`

Will anyone listen to me? I've gotten better, I don't know how to prove that to you. There are some things I can and need to do. --Shikku27316 (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)``````

Unblock-please converse with me about this

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Here, let's outline this: Gross incompetence: I'm not really bothering anyone. I'd like to be more "competent", not sure how I can prove that without actually having a chance. Does not understand policies: I understand them now, and I've been following them since the block. Makes personal attacks: I never really did, and haven't even come close since the block. I was thinking of apologising for the "ethnic slur", but now I can't. Interestingly, I have received two personal attacks since the block. Refuses to get to the point: Again, I really don't remember this happening, but since the block, I've stayed focused on the point of all conversations I've had. However, the admin I talked with failed to do this. Not grown up: I'm being civil and grown up with the admins, and I'm being very patient. Again, that admin is not being grown up, becuase he's ignoring me, rather than getting to the point. Edit collegially: I basically had all my uploads removed with no good reason other than "You're blocked, so your uploads contain anthrax", so if I'm unblocked, I can re-upload them. I have a lot of things I can edit. I think I've done pretty good, if you will listen, maybe you can talk with me, then I can get productive again. At least give me a second chance, to prove this to all of you. PLEASE just converse with me about this, we can talk about this.--Shikku27316 (talk) --Shikku27316 (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2013 (UTC)``" Decline reason: "The reason why no admins want to converse with you about this is due to your continued incompetence towards this project. This unblock request only further demonstrates it. I'm going to have to revoke your talk page editing privileges for a bit since it looks like you will continue to make further unblock requests until somebody agrees with your unbudging self. Please take the time to make yourself a clean slate. --O (谈 • висчвын) 05:30, 21 August 2013 (GMT)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

What "continued incompetence"? I'm trying to fix things. I have so much that I can fix. I really want to help this project. I have lots of great contributions to make. Reread the unblock request. I see nothing "incompetent". How do I get a clean slate? I think I already have one. The only reason for the whole "Analbeadz" thing was because I was really depressed. I'm better now, and I have a goal to make this place better. I can show you how, too. I'm not "unbudging". I'm trying to converse with someone who acctually understands this whole thing. Shikku27316 (talk) 15:50, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Gq flag.png

File:Gq flag.png is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This file is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of Genderqueer pride flag.png. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

沈澄心✉ 05:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)