User talk:Shabicht/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Scout Activity Centres of The Scout Association
User:Janezdrilc There are not Scout Activity Centres of The scout Association only, but also national and regional ones in many countries, like Base Scout Andreis in Italy, Skavtski okoljski center Kočevski rog and Taborniški center Gozdna šola in Slovenia, so I suggest new category: Scout Activity Centres by Country. Sebastjan Habicht 12:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Nekaj sem pouredil Category:Scouting in Slovenia. Drugače pa, če smatraš, da kakšna kategorija manjka, jo brez problema ustvariš – isto kot vsako drugo stran. Kar odločno. --Janezdrilc (talk) 00:11, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.
Dear Shabicht,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)
Dear Shabicht,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Kategorije cerkva
Pri slikah, kadar upodabljajo samo cerkev (brez naselja zraven), naj bo samo kategorija cerkve. Recimo, File:St. Agnes Church, Golika3.jpg sedaj vsebuje še druge kategorije (naselje, patrocinij ...), čeprav so te že vsebovane v sami kategoriji cerkve. V takih primerih torej ena sama kategorija cerkve zadostuje. --Janezdrilc (talk) 22:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Kategorija Malahornɑ
User:Janezdrilc Znotraj že obstoječe kategorije Občina Oplotnica (Municipality of Oplotnica) dodati kategorijo Malahorna, znotraj te pa podkategorijo Cerkev sv. Barbare, Malahorna , prosim za ureditevǃ Shabicht 08:41, 18. Marec 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Skavti logo blue.pdf
Copyright status: File:Skavti logo blue.pdf
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Skavti logo blue.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, JuTa 07:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Donat Mg 0,5 l -PET.jpg
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Donat Mg 0,5 l -PET.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
|
File:Skavti logo white.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Kategorija Slovenske Konjice
User:Janezdrilc Znotraj že obstoječe kategorije Slovenske Konjice dodati novo kategorijo Zasebna muzejska zbirka Slovenske Konjice, prosim za ureditevǃ Shabicht 08:28, 2. Maj 2020 (UTC)
Grb Slovenske Konjicə
Ponovno sem naložil grb občine Slovenske Konjice, ki sem ga snel z uradne spletne strani občine. Ker občina doslej ni podala nobene izjave o avtorskih pravicah svojih občinskih simbolov, sem jo tokrat pozval glede tega. Kam naj dostavim uradno izjavo občine o avtorstvu (ko jo bom prejel), da boste grb obdržali v zbirki, tako kot pri ostalih slovenskih občinah? Shabicht 16:07, 27. oktober 2020 (UTC)
Fotografija Dan Yeshayahu-ja v zbirki
V zbirki je objavljena fotografija Shayke Dan.jpg in tudi na izraelski strani Wikipedije Dan Yeshayahu, vendar je ne morem prenesti v slovensko wikipedijo. Ker je opis in status opisan samo v hebrejščini, prosim za pomoč. Shabicht 20:13, 11. december 2020 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:PBR-520 Streljko.jpg
Copyright status: File:PBR-520 Streljko.jpg
|
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:PBR-520 Streljko.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:PBR-520 Streljko crew.jpg
|
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PBR-520 Streljko crew.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JuTa 22:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:PBR-520 Streljko.jpg
|
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PBR-520 Streljko.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JuTa 22:04, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
We need your feedback!
Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!
I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.
We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.
Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.
Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.
Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Prihova
Hallo Shabicht!You have uploaded a foto from the mainaltar and a painting of the church in Prihova in your article. Who gave you permission to do this. I was there, and the priest has forbidden me to do that. Now i´m a little unsure. Kind regardsEdelmauswaldgeist (talk) 08:28, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Dearestǃ I spoked with priest personly and because I explained the pupose, the public use on Wikipedia only (not commercial) I got the permision. -- Shabicht (Pogovor) 18. September 2022 (UTC) Shabicht (talk) 06:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Dear shabicht! This is very mysterious. You have spoken with the priest bevor 3 years, and when i come, he says no. Perhaps it will be a new priest, or he was angry about me, because i don´t ask him bevor. He has spoken with my girlfriend while i´m taking pictures. And then he said not in wikipedia to me. Edelmauswaldgeist (talk) 13:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hallo Shabicht! The priest from Prihova allowed me now to upload my photos of the church. But he had security concerns with a few photos. He has never allowed a wikipedian to upload photos. Mr. Slavko Kranjc has been pastor there for 11 years. RegardsEdelmauswaldgeist (talk) 13:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:Kidričevo Cemetery memorial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 14:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 15:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
KategorijaːFazan
Znotraj že obstoječe kategorije naselja Lucija dodati novo kategorijo Potok Fazan, prosim za ureditevǃ Shabicht 16:51, 3. december 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 09:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
|
|
File:Ciril in Metod cerkev Bežigrad1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 11:38, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 18:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 18:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Slike sodobnih cerkve
Živijo. Za slike celjske cerkve sv. Duha, ki si jih ravnokar naložil, ti predlagam, da jih še enkrat naložiš na našo Wikipedijo, ker bodo tu v Zbirki zagotovo izbrisane, ker gre za sodobno arhitekturo. Pravtako lahko naložiš tudi slike cerkve v Tepanju in Kidričevem. Bodo zelo dobrodošle. Janezdrilc (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Kaj to koristi, vem da mi jih bodo ponovno izbrisali, potem jih tudi v wikipediji ne bo več, razen če se je na tem področju kaj spremenilo? Je še kakšna druga možnost objave fotografije za wiki, ne preko Zbirke? Prosim tudi za novi kategoriji v Zbirkiː potok ali kanal Fazan in Marina Portorož znotraj kategorije Lucija Piran (Marina Portorož je na področju Lucije). Shabicht (talk) 07:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Na Wikipedijo lahko nalagaš svoje slike po mili volji, tudi če je objekt na njih še avtorsko zaščiten. Tam se takih slik ne briše. Glej za primer w:sl:Slika:Odr004.jpg – po tem zgledu lahko tudi svoje slike naložiš. Ustvaril sem Category:Fazan Creek, Category:Portorož Harbour pa je že bila. --Janezdrilc (talk) 13:04, 7 May
2023 (UTC)
Category:Internautica in Category:Lucija Island gresta pod Category:Lucija Harbour in ne pod Category:Portorož Harbourǃ Najlepša hvala za razlago in pomočǃ Shabicht (talk) 15:45, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Ali sta Category:Portorož Harbour in Category:Lucija Harbour eno in isto? --Janezdrilc (talk) 14:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Kategorije sem uredil, tako kot morajo biti, Category:Portorož Harbour se nanaša na pristan z enim pomolom v Portorožu, Category:Lucija Harbour pa je dejansko Marina Portorož, na območju Lucije, znotraj te kategorije sta Internautica in umetni lucijski otok, ki še nima uradnega imena. Shabicht (talk) 15:45, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Mary of Rosary parish church Portoroz2.jpg
- File:Portoroz church altair detail.jpg
- File:Portoroz church altair.jpg
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 14:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
|
|
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 14:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Grojer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 14:06, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
|
|
File:Župnijska cerkev Zreče 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
