User talk:Sfu/1
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Image Tagging Image:Thomas bartholin.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Thomas bartholin.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Dodo 17:40, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Categories of varieties of Beryls
[edit]Hello. You removed Category:Morganite and Category:Golden beryl from Category:Minerals but, despite they also belong to the Category:Beryl sub-category, I believe they should also be added to the parent category. Why ? Because Beryl is a really big family, like quartz and most often, people do not know a given stone is a kind of Beryl or Quartz, and will look for it in the main category. For example, Onyx is a kind of Agate, which is a chalcedony which itself belongs to the quartz family (few know this — including me 5 min ago — and that's why they all 4 are in Category:Minerals).
If you and others at wikicommons are trying to achieve a complete taxonomy of minerals, what you did was right. Else, I suggest these minerals be brought back to the main category to ease the search of others. I'm doing it right now for Category:Morganite and Category:Golden beryl. If you're building a taxonomy, excuse me in advance and feel free to revert my changes. — Xavier, 16:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Hello,
In or of, I have not any personal preference, but my purpose is to standardize category titles.
According to w:Wikipedia:Naming conventions (categories), churches are in COUNTRY, as other buildings and made-made objects (see w:St Paul's Cathedral - in London). Religions are also in COUNTRY (see Category:Religion by country).
We can discuss this subject in Village pump, if you want. --Juiced lemon 12:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Foty Warszawy
[edit]Foty wywaliłem, usuwałem już z tej"serii" Kolumnę Zygmunta widzianą z poziomu ok 1,5 m nad Zygmuntem... też opisanajako self-made. Co do rysunku... to jak sam napisałeś być praca własna artysty, a to nie kwalifikuje grafiki do usunięcia. Pozdrawiam Radomil talk 20:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
południowy wschód
[edit]Korzystamy z tego samego słownika, a jednak to ja mam rację. W zdaniu o które się bijemy występuje przymiotnik południowo-wschodni, a nie rzeczownik z przymiotnikiem południowy wschód. Vide [1]. Jezioro jest w południowo-wschodnim Kazachstanie, albo na południowym wschodzie Kazachstanu. --Anniolek talk 16:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
zdjęcia Parku Skaryszewskiego
[edit]OK, ograniczę kategorię do minimalnej Masti 12:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
languages for categories?
[edit]hello there, you had a question once on the usage of local language over English in categories. I have started a discussion page on this topic, maybe you want to drop by and give your thoughts? Commons:Language for categories. sincerely Gryffindor 12:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Voivodeships
[edit]Hello,
The rule in Wikipedia Commons is that Categories are in English. If you don't apply the rule, there will be certainly a dispute. --Juiced lemon 00:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- However, you can still create the main article Województwo lubelskie for the category [[Category:Lublin Voivodeship| ]].--Juiced lemon 01:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Commons:Picture of the Year/2006 competition
[edit]I'm working on the Commons:Picture of the Year/2006 competition, due to be launched next Thurday, 1st Feb. We have a couple of templates, as below, that will be added to the Commons mains pages, and used to attract voters, but we need some help with translations. I wonder if you'd be able to assist, please? Many thanks. --MichaelMaggs 09:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
What is the best picture of 2006? The candidates have been chosen. Vote for your choice now in the final of the Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006 Final voting to choose the 2006 Picture of the Year is open until 28th February. Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | svenska | 粵語 | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) +/− |
Kategoria Warsaw
[edit]OK. Przepraszam. Poprawie się VaGla 21:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
re:
[edit]Just don't use our art for your own game/software. If you really want to do that, then send me an e-mail, with information on where/how/what/why you want to use, and, most likely, we can come to a deal.
Niestety ten fragment jakoby wyklucza komercyjne uzycie i zaprzecza licencji danej dla tej grafiki, pozdrawiam --Szczepan talk 20:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- No ale na pewno nie jest to taka licencja jaka podal uploader --Szczepan talk 21:20, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Żelechów_1916.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Żelechów_1916.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 14:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Żelechów-road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Żelechów-fields.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hi. I did a curve adjustment on your image. Please revert if you don't agree. Regards. Lycaon 23:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
identifying species on images
[edit]Just try me, you never know...;-). Lycaon 21:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Żelechów-Reymonta6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warszawa-Focus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
For both the photography and the editing! Congratulations -- carol 00:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warszawa-Biblioteka Narodowa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warszawa-Krakowskie november 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warszawa-Królikarnia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warszawa-pod Blachą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
You said this image would be too noisy. Could i retouch the image that it is not „too noisy“ or do I have to change any settings on my camera?--Dany3000 19:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vilnius park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vilnius Seimas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Goetheanum Dornach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torun klamka ul Szosa Chelminska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Morchella conica 1 beentree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Bliźniczka psia trawka
[edit]Zwróć proszę uwagę, co na polskiej Wikipedii ktoś napisał na temat twojego zdjęcia psiej trawki w dyskusji do artykułu (wg niego jest to szczotlicha siwa). Selso 00:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warszawa - Wilanów Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bitwa o Berlin rekonstrukcja.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Image Tagging Image:ZloteTarasyWarsaw2.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:ZloteTarasyWarsaw2.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. --Szczepan talk 17:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warszawa - fontanna w Ogrodzie Saskim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Żelechów-Stanisława.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rupicapra rupicapra - Jahňaci štít.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tank T-34.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veľká Studená dolina–top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hińczowe oka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Červené pleso.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Szewach Weiss.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jastrabia veža from dolina Zeleného plesa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pieris brassicae na kwiatku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
I've commented and changed the scope. Bidgee (talk) 10:11, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- I've replyed on the page. Bidgee (talk) 15:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Onion flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wilanów Palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
VI closure
[edit]Hi Sfu, Thank you for helping me to close valued image candidates. Please note that closure cannot be done earlier than at least seven days after the nomination according to Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules. I will revert a few of your closures done on nominations which has not been open for seven days. Cheers, -- Slaunger (talk) 19:07, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. I am sure you will not forget it again. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vilnius presidential palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Porto3flat-cc-contr-oliv1002 edit2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Porto3flat-cc-contr-oliv1002 edit2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
naerii 14:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- Also, I have closed Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Goetheanum Dornach.jpg as not featured. naerii 18:13, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warszawa - Ogród Saski Astronomia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Królikarnia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dwie maliny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gozd kaplica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Focus Filtrowa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marszałkowska Street in Warsaw.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seimas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pomnik Sienkiewicza w Okrzei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you Marcin for your promotion of one of my picture (Image:Thor Barge in Gaillard Cut.JPG) for QI status. I also appreciated the comments you made about Image:Lake Massawippi seen from North Hatley.JPG. I have to buy a better camera if I want to get rid of that noise problem. See you around! Phil13 (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
A vote on VIC
[edit]Hi Sfu, I inserted a support vote on your behalf here. Please check that this is in line with your actual opinion. I will await your response before I close the nomination. Just reply here. I am watching ;-) -- Slaunger (talk) 21:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, I forgot about it. Sorry. --Sfu (talk) 06:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Żelechów-kościół zwiastowania NMP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Staroleśna Dolina
[edit]Nie wiem o co konkretnie ci chodzi z tym czyszczeniem kategorii. Domyślam się, że chodzi ci o usunięcie kilku zdjęć, które nie były skategoryzowane. Ale ja ich nie usunąłem, a tylko przeniosłem do podkategorii, tak, by system kategorii był jednolity. Wszystkie zaś zdjęcia w kategorii Staroleśna Dolina znajdują się w artykule Veľká Studená dolina. No bo skoro ktoś podzielił kategrię Dolina Staroleśna na jeziora, to jaką podkategorię utworzyć dla zdjęć dotyczących samej doliny (bez jezior) ?. Ponadto w Wikipedii przydatna jest galeria dotycząca całej doliny. Tak nawiasem mówiąc jestem autorem największej liczby zdjęć w kategorii: Tatry, Beskid Wyspowy, Pieniny i Gorce. W kategorii Tatry jednak tak wielu wikipedystów tworzy systemy kategorii, tak wiele jest tutaj namieszane, że ostatnio już trudno mi się zorientować co jest co.Selso (talk) 11:39, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Twoje zdjęcie nie jest w kategorii, lecz w artykule Veľká Studená dolina. Zauważ, że w kategorii Category:Veľká Studená dolina nie ma nie tylko twojego zdjęcia, ale i moich, ani żadnych innych. W tej kategorii są tylko podkategorie i jeden artykuł (ten z twoim zdjęciem). Ale być może masz rację, że warto wstawić zdjęcia do kategorii (jak ktoś otworzy kategorie, to będzie miał przegląd zdjęć) - to zrób to, ale nie tylko dla swojego, lecz wszystkich pozostałych. Commons to prawdziwa stajnia Augiasza, głównie dlatego, że każdy zajmuje sie kategoryzacją własnych zdjęć, nie zważając na ogólny porządek. Niektórzy zaś są nadgorliwi, nie tak dawno jeden z wikipedystów do kilkuset moich zdjęć, które były już prawidłowo skategoryzowane dodał po kilka kategori wyższego rzędu z gór całej Europy... Pozdrawiam. Selso (talk) 14:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- ludzie różnie szukają zdjęć i trzeba im dać jak najwięcej możliwości dotarcia do nich. No to daj im tę możliwość (tylko weź też pod uwagę, że inni też edytują zdjęcia). Selso (talk) 16:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Featured Picture Nomination
[edit]I have closed your FP nomination Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Selassie restored.jpg as not featured. Thank you for your interest in promoting high quality content in the Wikimedia Commons, and I hope your next nomination is more successful. naerii 08:13, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Warszawa - Ogród Saski muzyka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Adamów kościół z dzwonnicą.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Adamów kościół front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trzmiel na białym kwiatku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kategoria:Staroleśna Dolina
[edit]Każde zdjęcie powinno trafiać do kategorii.. - no właśnie, każde. Ty jednak przywróciłeś do kategorii tylko jedno - swoje. Jest dobre, myślę jednak, że inne, skoro już są wpisane na commons też trzeba umieścić w tej kategorii. Tylko, że ktoś podzielił tę kategorię na podkategorie, np. Category:Dlhé pleso (Veľká Studená dolina). Ja wpisałem sie w ten nurt i utworzyłem dalsze podkategorie i teraz to trochę dziwnie wygląda. Kategoria Dolina Staroleśna dzieli się na kilka podkategorii, a oprócz niej było twoje zdjęcie, które nie należy do żadnej podkategorii, zapewne dlatego, że trudno dla niego ustalić nazwę podkategorii. Myślę, że obok niego powinny się znaleźć w takim razie wszystkie te, które przedstawiają ogólny wygląd doliny. Selso (talk) 15:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zakępie kaplica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wola Gułowska-trumna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belianske Tatry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Szczałb kapliczka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Adamów plebania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wola Gułowska dzwonnica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Wola Gułowska-trumna.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Wola Gułowska-trumna.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
--Simonizer (talk) 19:11, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
We are starting the discussion on POTY 2008. Would you like to join? - Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Szczałb kościół.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Huta Żelechowska droga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trakai Castle tourists.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wola Gułowska kościół .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Huta Żelechowska-droga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vilnius tentement house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vilnius house Pilies street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
category:Villages in Silesia
[edit]Witaj, może lepiej przenieść zawartość tej kategorii to category:Villages in Silesian Voivodeship? Śląsk to w końcu całkiem spory obszar. Yarl ✉ 15:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Bota mam podpiętego pod konto, więc problemu nie ma. Jest za to spory bałagan, np. w category:Regions of Poland, gdzie większość powinna trafić do województw. Yarl ✉ 15:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Dobry pomysł. Można coś napisać, chociaż generalnie mało osób zagląda do tutejszego Baru. Zacznę poprawiać co nieco, zobaczymy co z tego wyjdzie. Yarl ✉ 15:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
A, i jeszcze jedna uwaga, w Category:Piekary Śląskie, Katowice, Tychy i innych miastach na prawach powiatu kategoria "Silesian Voivodeship" zostaje, podobnie jak dla powiatów. Niech będzie jakaś ciągłość. Yarl ✉ 19:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- I jeszcze co do Category:Cities in Poland to przyjmujemy standard jak w Category:Cities in the United States, czyli wszystkie miasta to kategorii "Cities in xxx voivodeship" a potem wywali się Category:Cities in Poland by voivodeship i te wszystkie kategorie z województwami da się do Category:Cities in Poland. Yarl ✉ 19:37, 8 October 2008 (UTC)