User talk:Setincho
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
![]() |
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content.
We do this because Commons is a shared media repository. Downstream wikis have different policies based on local laws. Uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. In addition, fair use is not compatible with our aim as a collection of freely distributable media files. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally if your project allows this.
|
--Banfield - Amenazas aquí 12:31, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Y que tiene que ver con la imagen! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Setincho (talk • contribs) 20:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Entorno organizacional.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Entorno organizacional.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Entorno organizacional.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Taichi.
And also:
- File:Tecnoestructura y staff.png ( Nominator : Taichi | Reason : This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. )
- File:Managemente japónés.png ( Nominator : Taichi | Reason : This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. )
- File:Organización actual y futura.png ( Nominator : Taichi | Reason : This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. )
- File:Competencias organizacionales.png ( Nominator : Taichi | Reason : This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. )
- File:Modelo Penta.png ( Nominator : Taichi | Reason : This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ec empresa 11.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ec empresa 11.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
LMLM (talk) 08:08, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:01-03-fenicios-tinte-purpura b0550d32 1280x935.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LMLM (talk) 08:09, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Png-transparent-businessperson-consultant-organization-company-market-company-text-people-thumbnail.png
[edit]![]() |
File:Png-transparent-businessperson-consultant-organization-company-market-company-text-people-thumbnail.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LMLM (talk) 08:11, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Organización y entorno.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Organización y entorno.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Organización y entorno.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Herby talk thyme 12:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
File tagging File:Administrador.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Administrador.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Administrador.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
LMLM (talk) 14:13, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- @LMLM License
- HiClipart is an open community for users to share PNG images, all PNG cliparts in HiClipart are for Non-Commercial Use, no attribution required. Setincho (talk) 15:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Non-Commercial Use licenses are forbidden. --LMLM (talk) 15:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Administrador.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Please do not recreate deleted content
[edit]
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Dialog-warning.svg/30px-Dialog-warning.svg.png)
—Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Centro entrenamiento Jorge Griffa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
nicolas talkpage 13:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Estadio Newells Marcelo Bielsa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
nicolas talkpage 13:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Estadio Cubierto Claudio Newell.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
nicolas talkpage 13:51, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Palcos CANOB.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
nicolas talkpage 13:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Estadio Coloso del Parque Marcelo Bielsa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
nicolas talkpage 13:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Escudo del Colegio Comercial Anglo Argentino 1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LMLM (talk) 11:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM La imagen no viola nada está por todos lados.... Siempre en cosas improductivas.
- https://www.planetanewells.com/escudos/
- https://www.ole.com.ar/newells-old-boys/newells-mejores-escudos-100-top_0_VNX6YF8kVO.html
- https://www.instagram.com/football.rebrand/p/ClOwpaduy16/?img_index=2
- http://www.pionerodelfutbol.com/2014/11/heraldica-del-club-atletico-newells-old.html
- https://soccerstore.empretienda.com.ar/futbol-argentino/remera-escudos-newells-old-boys-los-leprosos
- https://www.facebook.com/612041379277838/photos/a.612044632610846/1044342639381041/?type=3 Setincho (talk) 23:23, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Reclamaciones, «conversaciones burocráticas patéticas» y «cosas improductivas» aquí. Gracias. LMLM (talk) 07:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Club-Atletico-Newells-School color.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LMLM (talk) 07:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Grupo de venta.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LMLM (talk) 21:14, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Barrio República de la Sexta y CUR UNR.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LMLM (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Estadio marcelo alberto bielsa 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
nicolas talkpage 03:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Estadio marcelo alberto biesa 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
nicolas talkpage 03:09, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Predio Jorge Griffa, ex Bella Vista.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
nicolas talkpage 12:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Estadio Cubierto Claudio Newell 1.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Estadio Cubierto Claudio Newell 1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Estadio Cubierto Claudio Newell 1.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
nicolas talkpage 12:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Estadio Marcelo Bielsa, El Coloso del Parque.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Estadio Marcelo Bielsa, El Coloso del Parque.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
nicolas talkpage 12:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Área metropolitana de Rosario.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
nicolas talkpage 02:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Erich Gutemberg.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Erich Gutemberg.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Erich Gutemberg.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
- File:Claudio Newell, intendente.jpg
- File:Club Atlético School Newell´s.jpg
- File:Edificio Colegio Comercial Anglo Argentino, Rosario.png
- File:Ana Margarita Jockinsen.jpg
- File:Inicio Colegio Comercial Anglo Argentino.jpg
- File:Espacio deportivo del Colegio Comercial Anglo Argentino.png
- File:Estadio Marcelo Bielsa-NOB.png
nicolas talkpage 02:27, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:NOB 120 años, escudo monográma.png
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:NOB 120 años, escudo monográma.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
nicolas talkpage 02:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Fuente de imágenes
[edit]Hola, @Setincho: Como he mencionado en el historial, «no se ha indicado la fuente de donde fue tomada la imagen y, si hay información posible, de su autor, es decir, su fotógrafo», debe comprenderse que mi intención no era dar a entender una necesidad absoluta de los detalles del fotógrafo, sino que expreso que dicha información debe proporcionarse si está disponible. Cuando usted etiqueta una imagen como proveniente de su propia fuente, esto implica que usted es el autor del contenido, es decir, el fotógrafo. Sin embargo, dado el contexto histórico de estas fotografías, que datan de hace más de varios años atrás, está claro que esta suposición no es válida en este caso. De hecho, las imágenes antes mencionadas pueden pertenecer al dominio público; sin embargo, la falta de atribución hace inconcebible determinar su autenticidad o confirmar si se han aplicado modificaciones. Es necesario, como en este archivo, especificar la fuente original del contenido. Le agradecería si pudiera agregar información a estos parámetros o tendré que agregar la etiqueta «sin fuente desde» antes del 7 de julio para su eliminación. Si usted tiene alguna duda, escríbame e intentaré responderle lo más rápido posible. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 07:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hola @Thooompson desconozco el fotógrafo. Yo las heredé de mi padre, y este no se de donde las sacó. Más que poner la plantilla fijate si podés subsanar el punto específico con esta info.que he brindado, que definitivamente es algo más productivo. Sldos. Setincho (talk) 11:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hola, @Setincho: El punto sigue siendo el mismo para mí, ya que no hay información sobre dónde se publicaron originalmente y, según su mensaje, su padre no era el fotógrafo, por lo que no pueden ser utilizados con la etiqueta «PD-heirs» (puestos en dominio público por el descendiente del autor). Si lo desea, puedo llevar la discusión al café para lograr un poco más de consenso al respecto; alternativamente, mi opinión es volver a agregar la plantilla, porque sin autor, fecha o fuente es difícil saber algo sobre las fotografías. Sin embargo, es posible que otros usuarios tengan más conocimientos sobre las imágenes o el mejor proceso para estos casos o tipos de imágenes relacionadas con Argentina. Al mismo tiempo, espero que usted pueda comunicarse de manera más profesional; Le doy mi tiempo para expresar mi punto de vista y poder llegar a un acuerdo con usted; esto no es improductivo, ni soy un «jilguero» ni un «flaco». Saludos. nicolas talkpage 14:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Thooompson Si es improductivo o no, es subjetivo. "no hay información sobre dónde se publicaron originalmente" ¿Por qué Ud. presupone publicación original? Son fotos que mi padre tenía, que seguramente algún fotógrafo le ha hecho llegar de algún juego original. Es decir, la fuente o archivo soy yo; aclarando que no conozco el nombre del fotógrafo.
- Creo que esto despeja cualquier duda, aunque no soy quién para decirle a Ud. Sldos. Setincho (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Setincho: Menciono sobre la publicación original porque usted no es la primera persona en publicar estas fotografías; Por ejemplo, el archivo Claudio Newell, intendente.jpg parece haber sido cortado de un periódico desconocido (ver aquí), por lo tanto dudo que no haya sido publicado antes, o que haya sido entregado sólo a su padre. Pero, como dije anteriormente, el autor no es tan importante como la fecha o una fuente que especifique su publicación para indicar que es de dominio público, pero usted no puede subirlas bajo una licencia Creative Commons únicamente porque usted es la fuente; No es lo mismo ser coleccionista de cromos que ser el creador de los cromos. Como mencioné, si desea puedo trasladar esto al café y posiblemente la respuesta a este tema se vuelve más clara. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 16:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Thooompson Yo no puedo responder por imágenes de otros, publicadas en ciertos lugares. Luego Ud. está citando a una revista públicamente conocida; que no tiene nada que ver con una foto. Fíjese Ud. que me ha dicho que la foto no podía ser mía por la antigüedad de la misma, pero sin embargo sí se la atribuye a un medio digital creado en 2011. ¿Cómo es eso posible? Le agrego más, puede haber varias imágenes iguales en circulación, ya que el fotógrafo pudo revelar varias de la misma foto. ¿Entonce Ud. cómo hace para demostrar el origen de la imagen, desconociendo el fotógrafo? ¿A qué medio tiene ganas de atribuírsela?
- De mi parte creo haber respondido a sus interrogantes iniciales, todo lo demás ya lo veo sin justificación ni sentido. Pero disponga Ud. si la quiere llevar al Café o donde le parezca. Sldos. Setincho (talk) 18:00, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Setincho: En primer lugar, no cité ninguna revista conocida; Como mencione anteriormente, lo más probable es que provenga de un periódico que yo desconozco. Al mismo tiempo, no lo atribuí a la página de Facebook; más bien es un enlace para que usted pueda ver que fue publicado previamente en las redes sociales, razonando que la imagen no le fue entregada unicamente a su padre. En ningún momento mencioné que atribuía el derecho de la imagen a esa página. Y, si bien es posible que el autor haya cedido una o más imágenes a numerosos periódicos, se trata de un asunto más complicado que conviene confirmar antes de poder discutirlo. Y usted no me ha dado una razón para creer que este sea el caso. Como no hemos llegado a un acuerdo, lo trasladaré al café, hoy o mañana cuando tenga tiempo. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 18:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Thooompson Pero discúlpeme! ¿A mi por qué debería importarme si 20 personas o medios han publicado imagen idéntica o similar previamente?
- ¿Le reitero la consulta, Ud. a quién tiene ganas de atribuírsela? Si no, colóquele Ud. una fuente y autor que le satisfaga y listo. A mi, mientras no se quite la foto mediante actos improductivos, me da igual quien figure como fuente y autor, realmente. Sldos. Setincho (talk) 18:37, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Setincho: Mencioné las razones por las que incluí el enlace y por qué creo que las fotografías no fueron entregadas solo a su padre, y tal vez no fueron entregadas a su padre en absoluto según sus comentarios anteriores. El hecho de que las imágenes hayan sido publicadas en otro lugar, debilitando la teoría de su autoría, y que también puedan ser eliminadas, según el contexto que he dado, creo que debería importarle. Voy a trasladar el tema al café para ver si se resuelve mediante búsqueda de fuentes o consenso, a menos que usted tenga una resolución o un mensaje que quiera dar. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 23:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Thooompson Veo que Ud. presume mala fe de mi parte. Dado eso, no tengo nada más que agregar. Ya le he contado la historia, pero Ud. se niega a aceptarla. ¿Le reitero la consulta, Ud. a quién tiene ganas de atribuírsela? Busque una fuente que le guste y colóquela, de mi parte ya le he dicho que no hay problema. Sldos. Setincho (talk) 00:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Setincho: Mencioné las razones por las que incluí el enlace y por qué creo que las fotografías no fueron entregadas solo a su padre, y tal vez no fueron entregadas a su padre en absoluto según sus comentarios anteriores. El hecho de que las imágenes hayan sido publicadas en otro lugar, debilitando la teoría de su autoría, y que también puedan ser eliminadas, según el contexto que he dado, creo que debería importarle. Voy a trasladar el tema al café para ver si se resuelve mediante búsqueda de fuentes o consenso, a menos que usted tenga una resolución o un mensaje que quiera dar. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 23:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Setincho: En primer lugar, no cité ninguna revista conocida; Como mencione anteriormente, lo más probable es que provenga de un periódico que yo desconozco. Al mismo tiempo, no lo atribuí a la página de Facebook; más bien es un enlace para que usted pueda ver que fue publicado previamente en las redes sociales, razonando que la imagen no le fue entregada unicamente a su padre. En ningún momento mencioné que atribuía el derecho de la imagen a esa página. Y, si bien es posible que el autor haya cedido una o más imágenes a numerosos periódicos, se trata de un asunto más complicado que conviene confirmar antes de poder discutirlo. Y usted no me ha dado una razón para creer que este sea el caso. Como no hemos llegado a un acuerdo, lo trasladaré al café, hoy o mañana cuando tenga tiempo. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 18:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Setincho: Menciono sobre la publicación original porque usted no es la primera persona en publicar estas fotografías; Por ejemplo, el archivo Claudio Newell, intendente.jpg parece haber sido cortado de un periódico desconocido (ver aquí), por lo tanto dudo que no haya sido publicado antes, o que haya sido entregado sólo a su padre. Pero, como dije anteriormente, el autor no es tan importante como la fecha o una fuente que especifique su publicación para indicar que es de dominio público, pero usted no puede subirlas bajo una licencia Creative Commons únicamente porque usted es la fuente; No es lo mismo ser coleccionista de cromos que ser el creador de los cromos. Como mencioné, si desea puedo trasladar esto al café y posiblemente la respuesta a este tema se vuelve más clara. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 16:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hola, @Setincho: El punto sigue siendo el mismo para mí, ya que no hay información sobre dónde se publicaron originalmente y, según su mensaje, su padre no era el fotógrafo, por lo que no pueden ser utilizados con la etiqueta «PD-heirs» (puestos en dominio público por el descendiente del autor). Si lo desea, puedo llevar la discusión al café para lograr un poco más de consenso al respecto; alternativamente, mi opinión es volver a agregar la plantilla, porque sin autor, fecha o fuente es difícil saber algo sobre las fotografías. Sin embargo, es posible que otros usuarios tengan más conocimientos sobre las imágenes o el mejor proceso para estos casos o tipos de imágenes relacionadas con Argentina. Al mismo tiempo, espero que usted pueda comunicarse de manera más profesional; Le doy mi tiempo para expresar mi punto de vista y poder llegar a un acuerdo con usted; esto no es improductivo, ni soy un «jilguero» ni un «flaco». Saludos. nicolas talkpage 14:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
@Setincho: No presumo mala fe de su parte respecto a estas imágenes, he respondido ampliamente con mis pensamientos, no me he negado a aceptar su historia, pero la he refutado. Sólo se sabe que su padre obtuvo las imágenes de alguna manera, y eso es todo, todo lo demás de su historia es un tal vez, todo esto según lo que usted ha escrito. Ya le he dado mis opciones recomendadas, mis pensamientos, mi tiempo, si presumiera mala fe de usted, no creo que deba hacer tanto para intentar llegar a un consenso con usted. Respecto a su pregunta, no sé a quién atribuir las imágenes, le agradecería que me pudiera ayudar con esto que es lo que vengo intentando transmitir, una fuente y estaré satisfecho. Pero mañana veré si puedo encontrar algunas fuentes o no, así que no trasladaré el tema al café por el momento, pero seguramente me comunicaré con usted nuevamente, y luego puede que sea necesario trasladarlo al café si no se encuentran fuentes a algunas imágenes. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 00:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Thooompson Como le dije la fuente y el autor soy yo; con eso debería bastar. Pero como también le he dicho, me da lo mismo que figure cualquier fuente. Por esta foto que Ud. ha mencionado ya he colocado otra fuente. Luego iré viendo de las otras, que no sea yo la fuente (de existir otra), aunque lo sea. No quiero que la comunidad se perturbe, aún sin justificativo. Sldos. Setincho (talk) 01:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Thooompson ¿Cómo le va? Ahí he realizado algunos cambios. Me dirá Ud. si lo considera más satisfactorio, respecto de lo anterior. Sldos. Setincho (talk) 13:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hola, @Setincho: Agregué fuentes a algunas imágenes porque no me gustó cómo decía "archivo particular" en la mayoría de ellas. He incluido fuentes a las fotografías en cuestión que, a pesar de no encontrar publicaciones periodísticas, dada la antigüedad de ellas, que superan los 120 años, asumo que están en el dominio público y modifico sus licencias en consecuencia. Las fuentes añadidas pueden confirmar la validez de las imágenes, confirmándolas como genuinas y sin modificaciones. Aunque estas fuentes no son perfectas, son suficientes para mí y pueden aliviar posibles inquietudes de otros usuarios, es posible que otras personas tengan puntos de vista opuestos y deseen entablar una discusión sobre los archivos antes mencionados. Especialmente sobre los siguientes dos archivos para los cuales no pude encontrar una fuente: File:Edificio Colegio Comercial Anglo Argentino, Rosario.png y File:Espacio deportivo del Colegio Comercial Anglo Argentino.png. Pero en mi opinión estoy satisfecho con la información actual que hay en los archivos, me parece mucho mejor que la información anterior, y no tendría ningún problema en terminar la discusión así, a su vez agradezco que usted agregue la fuente de File:Claudio Newell, intendente.jpg, porque parece una muy buena fuente la que usted uso. Yo puedo dar la discusión como finalizada a menos que usted quiera preguntar algo o seguir con el mismo tema. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 18:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Thooompson Bueno, como le dije no tengo inconveniente con cambiar la fuente si a la gente le parece mejor otra en vez de la mía particular. Así que procedo a cambiarla en esos dos archivos que Ud. señala, pero lamentablemente no tengo fuente de terceros de la calidad como la del archivo File:Claudio Newell, intendente.jpg. Queda cerrado el tema. Sldos. Setincho (talk) 22:05, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hola, @Setincho: Agregué fuentes a algunas imágenes porque no me gustó cómo decía "archivo particular" en la mayoría de ellas. He incluido fuentes a las fotografías en cuestión que, a pesar de no encontrar publicaciones periodísticas, dada la antigüedad de ellas, que superan los 120 años, asumo que están en el dominio público y modifico sus licencias en consecuencia. Las fuentes añadidas pueden confirmar la validez de las imágenes, confirmándolas como genuinas y sin modificaciones. Aunque estas fuentes no son perfectas, son suficientes para mí y pueden aliviar posibles inquietudes de otros usuarios, es posible que otras personas tengan puntos de vista opuestos y deseen entablar una discusión sobre los archivos antes mencionados. Especialmente sobre los siguientes dos archivos para los cuales no pude encontrar una fuente: File:Edificio Colegio Comercial Anglo Argentino, Rosario.png y File:Espacio deportivo del Colegio Comercial Anglo Argentino.png. Pero en mi opinión estoy satisfecho con la información actual que hay en los archivos, me parece mucho mejor que la información anterior, y no tendría ningún problema en terminar la discusión así, a su vez agradezco que usted agregue la fuente de File:Claudio Newell, intendente.jpg, porque parece una muy buena fuente la que usted uso. Yo puedo dar la discusión como finalizada a menos que usted quiera preguntar algo o seguir con el mismo tema. Saludos. nicolas talkpage 18:36, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hotel Jorge Griffa- fachada frente.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LMLM (talk) 06:45, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM Es mía la foto. Que drama tenés? 190.2.112.186 16:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC) --Setincho (talk) 16:34, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pero ¿es tuya como la de Google Maps? LMLM (talk) 19:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM La que esta en Wiki es mía; la otra ni idea. ¿No será tuya a lo mejor? Ya que preguntamos cualquier cosa. Setincho (talk) 19:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Me refiero a esta que has subido como "Trabajo propio", Autor: Setincho. ¿Eres el "autor" de ella, también? Si quieres te dejo el historial para que lo compruebes: [1] LMLM (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM Esa se me mezcló con una imagen mía, por eso no dije nada. ¿O no vio que no dije nada? Setincho (talk) 21:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Se te han vuelto a "mezclar" las imágenes porque dices que eres el autor de File:Ingreso Complejo Jorge Griffa 2.jpg que es igual que File:Ingreso Complejo Jorge Griffa 1.jpg menos un coche y dos conos. Es esa foto de la que has dicho más arriba "La que esta en Wiki es mía". Para no decir nada, creo que has dicho demasiado. LMLM (talk) 06:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM JA la foto es igual, menos esto, menos lo otro, menos aquello. Entonces NO ES igual Sr.! Deje de decir cualquier cosa, quiere. Sldos. 190.2.112.186 15:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)--Setincho (talk) 16:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Coge la foto ganadora del Premio World Press Photo del año 2024, cambia una pequeña parte y di que es tuya y que no es igual a la ganadora. Así nos reímos todos. LMLM (talk) 20:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM Se puso de moda inventar historias? Siga inventando no mas. Setincho (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Coge la foto ganadora del Premio World Press Photo del año 2024, cambia una pequeña parte y di que es tuya y que no es igual a la ganadora. Así nos reímos todos. LMLM (talk) 20:50, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM JA la foto es igual, menos esto, menos lo otro, menos aquello. Entonces NO ES igual Sr.! Deje de decir cualquier cosa, quiere. Sldos. 190.2.112.186 15:29, 12 July 2024 (UTC)--Setincho (talk) 16:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Se te han vuelto a "mezclar" las imágenes porque dices que eres el autor de File:Ingreso Complejo Jorge Griffa 2.jpg que es igual que File:Ingreso Complejo Jorge Griffa 1.jpg menos un coche y dos conos. Es esa foto de la que has dicho más arriba "La que esta en Wiki es mía". Para no decir nada, creo que has dicho demasiado. LMLM (talk) 06:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM Esa se me mezcló con una imagen mía, por eso no dije nada. ¿O no vio que no dije nada? Setincho (talk) 21:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Me refiero a esta que has subido como "Trabajo propio", Autor: Setincho. ¿Eres el "autor" de ella, también? Si quieres te dejo el historial para que lo compruebes: [1] LMLM (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM La que esta en Wiki es mía; la otra ni idea. ¿No será tuya a lo mejor? Ya que preguntamos cualquier cosa. Setincho (talk) 19:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Pero ¿es tuya como la de Google Maps? LMLM (talk) 19:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ingreso Complejo Jorge Griffa 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LMLM (talk) 06:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Hotel Jorge Griffa- fachada frente.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
LMLM (talk) 20:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Evolución escudos. Newell´s Old Boys.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
LMLM (talk) 20:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ee ciencia.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ee ciencia.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
LMLM (talk) 20:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ec emp1.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ec emp1.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
LMLM (talk) 20:28, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- @LMLM Yo soy fuente y autor. ¿Pero a Ud. que le gustaría que figure? A lo mejor puedo satisfacerlo. Sldos. Setincho (talk) 21:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ingreso Complejo Jorge Griffa 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
nicolas talkpage 21:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Estadio cubierto Claudio Newell-exterior.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
nicolas talkpage 21:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
COM:AN/B
[edit]
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Gtk-dialog-info.svg/50px-Gtk-dialog-info.svg.png)
nicolas talkpage 22:40, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Thooompson Gracias por notificar. Setincho (talk) 22:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)