User talk:Sepultura
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 06:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Arany2000px-Ag-Au-Cu-colours-hungarian.png was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Stuka01.ogg was uncategorized on 31 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Sárgarigó.ogg was uncategorized on 1 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Háziveréb.ogg was uncategorized on 1 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Gólyakelepelés.ogg was uncategorized on 2 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Sarlósfecske.ogg was uncategorized on 2 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:45 Oriolus oriolus, Le Bourbier, Moirans, (France) 23-06-01.ogg was uncategorized on 2 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Búbos banka.ogg was uncategorized on 2 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Ugató holló.ogg was uncategorized on 5 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Holló.ogg was uncategorized on 5 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Ugató holló2.ogg was uncategorized on 5 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Liberators Blast Naples.ogg was uncategorized on 15 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Kamikaze attacks on U.S. ships.ogg was uncategorized on 20 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:The German battleship Tirpitz.ogg was uncategorized on 21 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:A Norvég-tenger határokkal2.png was uncategorized on 23 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Norvég-tenger térkép 2.png was uncategorized on 23 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:A Norvég-tenger határokkal.png was uncategorized on 23 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:17, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Zagyva - átnézeti térkép.png was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Gerje River.png was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Image from 1 3 melleklet viztest adatlapok vizfolyas viztestek gerje 2 12-2.png was uncategorized on 5 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Poleszje átnézetes térképe.png was uncategorized on 7 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Ju 87 Stuka attack.ogg was uncategorized on 8 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:16, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:RomanovsCoatRF.png was uncategorized on 17 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:05, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Caen kiejése.ogg was uncategorized on 6 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:16, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Baki kiejtése.ogg was uncategorized on 12 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 20:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Maschinengewehr 42.ogv was uncategorized on 23 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ugató holló.ogg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ugató holló.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ugató holló.ogg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ugató holló2.ogg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ugató holló2.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ugató holló2.ogg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Sepultura, you provided "B. Nóri" as source and author for the above listed files. What or who is this? You need to provide his/her permission. In addition, you wrote into the description "NonCommercial NoDerivs", but at the same time you put the file under a CC-BY-SA license, which allows also commercial use and making derivatives, which is a contradiction. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:20, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
File:General_Erwin_Rommel_in_North_Africa,_1941.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 08:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Búbos banka.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Sarlósfecske.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Gólyakelepelés.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File:45 Oriolus oriolus, Le Bourbier, Moirans, (France) 23-06-01.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Sárgarigó.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 23:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Háziveréb.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 23:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Stuka01.ogg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Stuka01.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stuka01.ogg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 23:42, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Me 323 Gigant.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 23:51, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Image from 1 3 melleklet viztest adatlapok vizfolyas viztestek gerje 2 12-2.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Image from 1 3 melleklet viztest adatlapok vizfolyas viztestek gerje 2 12-2.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Image from 1 3 melleklet viztest adatlapok vizfolyas viztestek gerje 2 12-2.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Gerje River.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Gerje River.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Gerje River.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Zagyva - átnézeti térkép.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Zagyva - átnézeti térkép.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zagyva - átnézeti térkép.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
File:Elvis Something.ogg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 15:46, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
File:Panzerkampfwagen_VI_B.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
91.57.86.224 00:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Kamov_Ka-25_in_action.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Andrej_Tupoljev_ödvözli_a_TU-144_pilótáit.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.106.25 13:22, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
File:The_German_battleship_Tirpitz.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.106.25 13:23, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Soviet_armoured_train_1975.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.106.25 13:26, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
File:The_German_battleship_Tirpitz.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
80.187.106.255 12:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Goebbels látogatása Modelnél.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 02:16, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:40M Nimród.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:40M Nimród.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:40M Nimród.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hungarian Bofors 29M 8 cm anti-aircraft gun.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hungarian Bofors 29M 8 cm anti-aircraft gun.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hungarian Bofors 29M 8 cm anti-aircraft gun.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Többszörözés
[edit]Most jobban utánanéztem, a 83-84/E §-okban foglaltak szerint bizonyos mértékig ugyan van joga adatbázisoknak korlátozni a felhasználási jogokat, de szerzői jogi licencet nem adhat, márpedig a Creative Commons egyértelműen szerzői jogi licenc... Tessék, például erre a képre milyen szerzői jogi alapon vonatkozik cc licenc, szerinted? Vagy ha Lakatos Mária az ennek az oldalnak a közepén található 1986-os "Petri György, Várady Szabolcs és Fodor Géza Csobánkán" c-ű kép készítőja, akkor vajon hogyan készíthette a Fortepanon az 1900-ban készült képeket? Vagy ő maga szupernagyi, vagy a Fortepan nagyon nincs tisztában, mi a különbség a szerzői és tulajdonjog között, főleg nem licencelési szempontból. Érted már, mire gondolok? Fauvirt (talk) 19:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Hát én meg nem akarom arra építeni a saját életemet és másokét, hogy nincsenek meg a morális alapok és bárki bármikor arra hivatkozva, hogy "á, hát úgyse lépsz fel" megsértheti a jogaimat vagy visszaélhet velük, akár tudtomon kívül, tudod? Ez veszélyes "játék"... tudom, hogy létezik de ez nem az én "játékom". Ha a te lelkiismeretedet nem bántja, bár szomorúnak tartom (akármilyen jelentéktelennek is tűnjön egy kép szerzőségéhez való jog), de hát mit tehetnék, de pártolni nem fogom soha. Ebben az esetben csak azért álltam az "ügy" mellé, mert bár - és ebben nagyon is igaza van 'Jim'-nek - sehol sem látszik, hogy valóban úgy adták oda a képeket a rokonok, hogy tisztában voltak a cc-by-sa felhasználással, de a (feltételezhetően) tényleges jogtulajdonosok adományozásának ténye "feketén-fehéren" megtalálható. Most elvileg újravitatják Jim kezdeményezésére és rám hivatkozva, de azt kérte Jim, hogy mint egyetlen a magyar nyelvet bíró admin, grin is megnyilvánulhatna. Úgyhogy ha gondolod, keresd meg őt (itt van a kérés). Mindenesetre jó lenne, ha a Fortepannak (ha van ilyenjük) lenne egy az OTRS-ben tárolt engedély-gyűjteménye is, ami alapján már biztosan nem lehetne belekötni a licenc-engedély valódiságába, illetve ki lehetne szűrni a rosszul licencelt képeket. Ez véleményem szerint nem feltétlenül anyagi kérdés, hanem inkább erkölcsi... főleg, hogy a Soros hátterű Közép-Európai Egyetemen működő Nyílt Társadalom Archívum (OSA Archívum) összetett funkciójú levéltár (legalábbis a honlapjuk szerint) "segíti" őket....
- Bocs a kis-esszéért, de muszáj volt kiírnom... hiába, nem vagyok egy "Don Corleone" no. ;oD De ha és amiben lehet és tudok segítek. Fauvirt (talk) 21:31, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Szia! Ne haragudj, hogy csak most reagálok, de nagyon-nagyon jó dolog, hogy írtál nekik és hogy így reagáltak! Természetesen, amiben csak tudok, segítek, hogy ez az együttműködés sikeres lehessen. :o) Átgondolom, hogy az események fényében hogyan lehetne úgy megoldani, hogy se nekik, se nekünk (Wikipédia, Commons) ne kelljen túl nagy energia abba, hogy ez létrejöhessen és írok nekik. Annyit kérek, hogy írj nekem a hu:Speciális:E-mail küldése/Fauvirt-ra és közösen kitaláljuk (nem szeretnélek kihagyni). Üdv, Fauvirt (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I have uploaded a longer version of the file. Could you please kindly check the Hungarian subtitles ? Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 06:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nardog (talk) 23:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sepultura,
, as Norway and Sweden are swapped.
TGCP (talk) 16:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Käthe Kollwitz by Erna Lendvai-Dircksen, c.1925.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 15:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Georg Kolbe by Erich Retzlaff, 1944.jpg
- File:Heinrich Himmler by Erich Retzlaff, 1933.jpg
- File:Joseph Goebbels by Erich Retzlaff, 1933.jpg
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 15:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Sculpture-of-Stalin-and-Lysenko-which-was-built-in-Stavropol-city-in-1952-and-demolished.png
[edit]File:Sculpture-of-Stalin-and-Lysenko-which-was-built-in-Stavropol-city-in-1952-and-demolished.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Rosenzweig τ 15:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Az Ukrán SzSzK első titkára, Scserbickij V. látogatása Tiszapéterfalván.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 07:03, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Adigeföld járásainak térképe
[edit]Üdv! A térképen el van írva a Giaginszkajai járás neve. Peyerk (talk) 08:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Броварська катастрофа — траєкторія hu.svg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Броварська катастрофа — траєкторія hu.svg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Броварська катастрофа — траєкторія hu.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:50, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Moscow metro map
[edit]Hi. I can see you've translated the map I maintain. I'm glad, but can I ask why would you use a png copy, and not the original file svg translation? I'm changing the map every day, this way it will keep updated. IKhitron (talk) 00:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Приветствую!
- Я сделал транслитерацию на венгерский и это получилась хорошо пока это было в Инкскейпе. Когда открыл в браузере всё было по английский, по этому я решил экспортировать в пнг. Также смотрится качественно. Спасибо за труд. С уважением. Sepultura (talk) 11:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Добрый день, @Sepultura. Понятно. В таком случае, если хотите, могу вам помочь решить все эти проблемы, поскольку я с ними уже сталкивался, искал и находил решение. Как переводить без Инкскейпа, а намного проще, редактируя код напрямую с помощью инструмента специально для этого на викискладе. Как увидеть png результат при открытии в браузере, и на правильном языке. Как добиться того, чтоб карта всегда была с последними измениями, включая перевод. Это совсем не трудно, зависит только от вашего желания выслушать, и конечно не обязывает принять или отклонить, пока не выслушаете и не обдумаете. Пожалуйста, всегда рад. IKhitron (talk) 12:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте IKhitron! У меня на Инкскейпе подобных проблем не было. За то были другие неприятные явления, например место надписи не совпадало с оригиналом. Я не думаю вернуться в этом случае к svg, качество удовлетворяет меня. Конечно интересует, как редактировать надписи без Инкскейпа и буду благодарен если посоветуете как это сделать. Надеюсь вы свободно читаете на этом языке. Всего хорошего! Sepultura (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Дело не в удовлетворении качества, @Sepultura, а в том, что через несколько дней карта устареет, и её придётся переводить с нуля в Инскейпе, всё по новой, и так снова и снова каждый раз. Что касается несовпадения места,это значит, что я использовал неправильный класс css. Моя ошибка, о которой мне обязательно надо знать, чтоб исправить. Поэтому раз вы согласны учиться, давайте сделаем так. Переведём в черновике три-четыре надписи, загрузим, и я вам всё покажу. Надеюсь, после этого у вас не будет проблем понять с этим вариантом, и возражений держать всё вместе. Посмотрим. Как можно начать:
- Откройте страницу здесь.
- Установите язык слева на русский или английский по выбору, и язык справа на переводной.
- Переведите несколько выражений на выбор.
- Нажмите на "Log in to enable uploading" и войдите через Википедию.
- Нажмите на "Upload to Commons".
- Скажите мне, я напишу викикод для просмотра, так, чтоб работало и в браузере.
- IKhitron (talk) 17:26, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Добрый день! Теперь я всё понял, и вижу разницу. Как только будет время я сделаю новую карту по вашему указанию. Благодарю вас за заботу. Sepultura (talk) 14:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Я очень рад, @Sepultura. Но ни в коем случае не начинайте, пока вместе не выберем время. Потому что, как я говорил, я меняю карту постоянно, и конфликт редактирования ни к чему хорошему не приведёт. В ближайшие дни будет готов и согласован в проекте новый вариант, с большим количеством изменений, исправлений, и двумя третями пятого диаметра, маршрут которых уже утверждён. Я над ним непрерывно работаю в ru:file:Moscow metro map ru sb future draft.svg. Но там ещё есть что поменять, в основном в пятом диаметре. Как только будет готово, я загружу его в черновик на складе, и мы сможем договориться, когда будете делать. А конкретнее, вы назначите время, в которое мне нельзя трогать файл, потому что вы над ним работаете. Когда закончите, я загружу в чистовик, и буду продолжать работать уже с переведённой версией. Спасибо. IKhitron (talk) 14:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Отлично! Думаю лучше было бы один из воскресений, чтобы было время на транслитерацию и на проверку. Вообще то мне подходит любой день. Sepultura (talk) 14:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Как вам будет удобно. Я почти уверен, что будет готово в ближайшие сутки, всё уже утвердили. Я тогда напишу здесь, и выбирайте, когда вам удобно, предупредите за час, я закруглюсь и остановлюсь. IKhitron (talk) 23:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Добрый вечер IKhitron! Мне всегда удобно, но лучше всего это конец недели. Если не на этой недели, так на следующей и.т.д. Но возможно и в будних днях. Sepultura (talk) 17:14, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Как вам будет удобно. Я почти уверен, что будет готово в ближайшие сутки, всё уже утвердили. Я тогда напишу здесь, и выбирайте, когда вам удобно, предупредите за час, я закруглюсь и остановлюсь. IKhitron (talk) 23:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Отлично! Думаю лучше было бы один из воскресений, чтобы было время на транслитерацию и на проверку. Вообще то мне подходит любой день. Sepultura (talk) 14:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Я очень рад, @Sepultura. Но ни в коем случае не начинайте, пока вместе не выберем время. Потому что, как я говорил, я меняю карту постоянно, и конфликт редактирования ни к чему хорошему не приведёт. В ближайшие дни будет готов и согласован в проекте новый вариант, с большим количеством изменений, исправлений, и двумя третями пятого диаметра, маршрут которых уже утверждён. Я над ним непрерывно работаю в ru:file:Moscow metro map ru sb future draft.svg. Но там ещё есть что поменять, в основном в пятом диаметре. Как только будет готово, я загружу его в черновик на складе, и мы сможем договориться, когда будете делать. А конкретнее, вы назначите время, в которое мне нельзя трогать файл, потому что вы над ним работаете. Когда закончите, я загружу в чистовик, и буду продолжать работать уже с переведённой версией. Спасибо. IKhitron (talk) 14:42, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Добрый день! Теперь я всё понял, и вижу разницу. Как только будет время я сделаю новую карту по вашему указанию. Благодарю вас за заботу. Sepultura (talk) 14:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
- Дело не в удовлетворении качества, @Sepultura, а в том, что через несколько дней карта устареет, и её придётся переводить с нуля в Инскейпе, всё по новой, и так снова и снова каждый раз. Что касается несовпадения места,это значит, что я использовал неправильный класс css. Моя ошибка, о которой мне обязательно надо знать, чтоб исправить. Поэтому раз вы согласны учиться, давайте сделаем так. Переведём в черновике три-четыре надписи, загрузим, и я вам всё покажу. Надеюсь, после этого у вас не будет проблем понять с этим вариантом, и возражений держать всё вместе. Посмотрим. Как можно начать:
- Здравствуйте IKhitron! У меня на Инкскейпе подобных проблем не было. За то были другие неприятные явления, например место надписи не совпадало с оригиналом. Я не думаю вернуться в этом случае к svg, качество удовлетворяет меня. Конечно интересует, как редактировать надписи без Инкскейпа и буду благодарен если посоветуете как это сделать. Надеюсь вы свободно читаете на этом языке. Всего хорошего! Sepultura (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Добрый день, @Sepultura. Понятно. В таком случае, если хотите, могу вам помочь решить все эти проблемы, поскольку я с ними уже сталкивался, искал и находил решение. Как переводить без Инкскейпа, а намного проще, редактируя код напрямую с помощью инструмента специально для этого на викискладе. Как увидеть png результат при открытии в браузере, и на правильном языке. Как добиться того, чтоб карта всегда была с последними измениями, включая перевод. Это совсем не трудно, зависит только от вашего желания выслушать, и конечно не обязывает принять или отклонить, пока не выслушаете и не обдумаете. Пожалуйста, всегда рад. IKhitron (talk) 12:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
- Добрый день. К сожалению, заняло много времени, босс проекта уехал на лето. Сейчас всё готово, новая версия уже во всех википедиях. Можете в любой момент предупредить меня здесь за час, чтоб я не трогал, когда вам удобно, и начинать работать. IKhitron (talk) 11:22, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Спасибо большое. Наверно в воскресенье сделаю. Sepultura (talk) 14:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Добрый вечер! В воскресенье я сделал перевод и загрузил его. Если что-то не так получилось, повторю. Sepultura (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Куда? Я его нигде не нахожу. IKhitron (talk) 17:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- После перевода кнопка Загрузка. После этого долго ждал на "Разрешение". Потом, как понял загрузилось. Если нет, буду опять делать, но это заберает больше как два часа. Sepultura (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Оно всё должно было сохраниться в памяти компьютера, при открытии линка инструмента перевода. IKhitron (talk) 17:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- После перевода кнопка Загрузка. После этого долго ждал на "Разрешение". Потом, как понял загрузилось. Если нет, буду опять делать, но это заберает больше как два часа. Sepultura (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Куда? Я его нигде не нахожу. IKhitron (talk) 17:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Bajer
[edit]Hi Sepultura. You asked me about the word "bajer" at my hrwiki talk page. I'm not familiar with the word, and https://hjp.znanje.hr lists two main meanings (neither in Croatian standard language). "Bajer za glinu" could be something like "clay depot", "clay basin", "clay storage", "clay heap". Hard to say exactly without seeing a picture of it. I'd say depot, it's general enough. Best, Ponor (talk) 11:53, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hvala puno Ponor. Sepultura (talk) 13:11, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Miki Filigranski (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Update request
[edit]Hello.
Can you remove the flag of the de facto Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (Artsakh) which dissolved in 2023 in File:Наднацыянальныя постсавецкія ўтварэньні.svg, File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies-fr.svg, File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies-hu.svg, File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies-ky.svg, File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies-ru.svg, File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies RU.png and File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies-sv.svg?
It has been removed in the original English version File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies-en.svg.
Yours sincerely, 31.200.23.185 07:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. Sepultura (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the update. Can you also update the other language versions as well by removing the Nagorno-Karabakh flag? 31.200.23.185 20:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Removing the flag is not difficult, but uploading the new version is not available for me. This is why I don’t want to upload a new file. Perhaps there will be time, I will do it, but not now. Sorry, I don't know yet. Sepultura (talk) 15:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I understand. Thank you again for that update. 31.200.23.185 18:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have updated File:Supranational PostSoviet Bodies RU.png. Oirattas (talk) 19:29, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Removing the flag is not difficult, but uploading the new version is not available for me. This is why I don’t want to upload a new file. Perhaps there will be time, I will do it, but not now. Sorry, I don't know yet. Sepultura (talk) 15:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the update. Can you also update the other language versions as well by removing the Nagorno-Karabakh flag? 31.200.23.185 20:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.