User talk:Sattar91
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:TOMRA LOCKUP H 4C PNG.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:TOMRA LOCKUP H 4C PNG.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:34, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Hello @Magog the Ogre: , tried to make it a bit better, please have a look and feedback.--Sattar91 (talk) 09:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that should do. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- Super!--Sattar91 (talk) 07:34, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I think that should do. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics)
[edit]In other languages (translate this)
|
---|
|
![]() |
![]() Thank you for uploading some images!
Did you know that Wikimedia Commons recommends the SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) format for certain types of images? Scalable Vector Graphics are designed to look appropriate at any scale, and SVG images are easier to modify and translate, helping Wikimedia to distribute knowledge to all of the world. A lot of modern programs support SVG export. If you encountered problems or have questions, don't hesitate to ask me, a member of the Graphic Lab, or the Graphics village pump. Uploading images in SVG format isn't mandatory, but it would help. (To avoid any misunderstandings, please don't just put raster images into an SVG container as embedded raster.) Thanks, and happy editing!
|
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Thanks for the comment, I tried to make it SVG by some online converter, but the outcome was a black-and-white image which did not represent the colorful logo properly. Have we got a recommended tool in Wikipedia to convert JPG or BMP formats to SVG?
Hello!
Thank you for uploading File:Ball joint cross section (from English Wikipedia to be used in other languages).jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 06:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
- Roger that.--Sattar91 (talk) 13:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- The licencing is clear and there is no CR violation as I carefully scrutinized this specific file and its rights before uploading, I shall provide my arguments in the entry you made.--Sattar91 (talk) 12:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Amidzad Partners.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
And also:
Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ali Bakhtiar.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ali Bakhtiar.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ali Bakhtiar.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: Hello, These are images from Tasnim which do not have a "watermark" or name of photographers, and per this discussion it shall undergo the "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License." mentioned at the very bottom of the the homepage of the news agency. --Sattar91 (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- The source fields in each images, here on Wikimedia Commons, when the images are not "own work", must have a link to the web page source, not to a jpg file. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:21, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Good to know that. Are you happy with File:Morteza Saffar Natanzi.jpg now?--Sattar91 (talk) 11:40, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes it's exactly that. However, as you can read it there, I think you have to use
{{subst:tasnim/subst}}
instead of{{Tasnim}}
, in the purpose the file be reviewed by someone. I changed it in this file. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, I also addressed that in Khorshid Karevan, Eshrat Kordestani and Ali Bakhtiar.--Sattar91 (talk) 12:35, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks you, I removed the "no permissions" tag. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ali Bakhtiar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
lNeverCry 23:09, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Eshrat Kordestani.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
lNeverCry 04:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Morteza Saffar Natanzi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
lNeverCry 22:44, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:OneSubsea logo as of April 2016.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:29, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:JCPOA Signatures.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:JCPOA Signatures.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- sorry about that...--Sattar91 (talk) 11:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Taheri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |