User talk:Sammandi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sammandi!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:15, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sammandi, you need at least 50 edits to vote on Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list, see section 2.2 on Commons:Quality images candidates which says. "Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination." You made 12 edits. Therefore, please refrain from voting until you reach the 50 edits that are required. I am going to strike your invalid votes. Sorry and best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsarap River1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsarap River2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit soft, but colors are good. --Sebring12Hrs 15:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kursha Monastery1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The beautiful light makes up for the lack of sharpness. --Zinnmann 11:29, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phuktal Gompa1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shingo La1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:24, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shashur monastery1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- 02:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wild housefly1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Fixed the categorization. Now ready for QI. --MB-one 13:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chandra Taal1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Espandero 20:25, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solomons cockatoo1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:40, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mandarinduck1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]