User talk:SCP-2000/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, SCP-2000!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nomination. I don't think it will succeed because of the issues listed of the first voters. That's also the reason why I didn't nominate it. But nevertheless, many thanks. --Llez (talk) 12:55, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SCP-2000!

I want to talk you about the interwiki links because they can be very useful for you if you want to link to another Wikimedia projects, as the zh-wiki. You can read more about them in the Meta page Help:Interwiki linking but in few words, you can write this links with some prefixes. For example, in the case of the link I shared with you just now, if you check the code, you can see the meta: prefix; it says to the system that the page is in the Meta-Wiki project.

I hope I have helped you! I write you about because I saw the external link in your valued image nomination.

Regards, Ivanhercaz (talk) 16:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2018-12-1 HK St. Alfred's Church View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Alfred's Church, Hong Kong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2019-07-20 Lennon Wall in Hong Kong book fair(2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:39, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The stand news live screenshots

你好!我建議將呢個分類嘅圖片全部插入{{The Stand News}},噉佢哋就會自動歸落Category:Images from Stand News,之後刪除呢個分類,好唔好?唔使分開兩類。如果覺得Images from Stand News呢個類名唔夠準確嘅話,都可以改。--Roy17 (talk) 13:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:SCT comparative context.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Catherine Laurence (discussion) 09:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:UNSW Rugby players.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 20:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:2019-07-28 Lennon Wall in Hong Kong Creative Paradise 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Removing DR tags

Please do not remove a DR tag, as you did here, while the discussion is still open. This rule applies even if you are withdrawing the request. The user who closes the discussion will remove the tag. Brianjd (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Destruction of Inter-Korean Liaison Office (4).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: KCNA photos are not "Current news reports". They have always been deleted at DR as copyvios.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Finnusertop (talk) 22:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Please note that I have added additional files uploaded by you to the nomination at: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Destruction of Inter-Korean Liaison Office (4).jpg Finnusertop (talk) 01:10, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've added one further file to the nomination. Finnusertop (talk) 01:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concering the File source is not properly indicated: File:Akraina exhibition.jpg

@SCP-2000: I have added more to the description of the image. Is it satisfactory now? or should I add more to the description?. Can you remove the warning 'this media may be deleted' now?--Hackasaur (talk) 15:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

有關File:VOA Mei Foo primary election.jpg

File:VOA Mei Foo primary election.jpg中右邊PePe右上角紙是初選相關的,可以unblurr嗎?--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 11:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

关于The hungry

您好。hungry.com网站已有至少9年没有任何更新,我相信从其获得授权声明是非常难的,但我还会试一试。但是网站最下方有Copyright © 2003-2008, The Hungry Programmers 字样,我几乎对版权相关知识一无所知,还请您帮忙解释一下这个的具体含义,使我以后不会再犯这样的错误。感谢!--Yining Chen (talk) 13:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yining Chen: 「版權所有」的意思。另麻煩指出hungry.com有何知名度或有否條目介紹此網站,個人認為相關Logo有違COM:SCOPE之嫌。謝謝。--SCP-2000 08:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
其开发了与GNU Classpath共同使用的Japhar虚拟机,我本想在写完该条目(Japhar)后作为配图使用。Yining Chen (talk) 08:17, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Yining Chen: 感謝釋疑,那應該沒有問題了。 SCP-2000 08:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A goat for you!

Words of admiration for your patience with https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:%E5%92%BD%E9%A0%AD%E3%81%B9%E3%81%95#File:Kindness_from_Admin.png

Wow.

Zezen (talk) 09:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

刪除相片

SCP-2000 你好, 下列三張相片因來源不明需要刪除,包括:

請你接受本人意見,多謝🙏 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.19.24.64 (talk) 17:45, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

來自他人照片說是自己作品

你好,

但有連結來源 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.19.24.64 (talk) 15:26, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Admin?

Hi. I have seen your name popping up in DR's I close and clearly you know what you're doing. Have you considered standing for admin in 2021? 15:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

@Gbawden: Forgive me for using few days to decides. Since my real life is busy and my experience of dealing with DR is not enough for me at present, I think this moment is not the best time to stand for admin. Thank you for your invitation. SCP-2000 04:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. But consider it at some time. And thanks for your help, especially weighing in on DR's Gbawden (talk) 06:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

頁面被破壞

你好, 頁面溶劑化顯色 被某個使用者破壞,請回退此頁面,多謝🙏🏻

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/溶劑化顯色 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.19.24.64 (talk) 15:34, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Microsoft Visual Studio Code 1.53.2 zh CN.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(Dasze) 15:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

吳逸志

Untitled

hi, We are the author of the logo and have sent a release email regarding Tradelink.svg and Tradelink.png [Ticket#2021042010006151] but wikipedia still deleted the logo so what is it now? TLKcorpcomm (talk) 06:55, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TLKcorpcomm: Hello, since you didn't provide valid permission for that file, it was deleted by the admin. You should follow Commons:OTRS instruction or OTRS volunteer 's response (if exist) to release permission. Please don't re-upload the deleted image. If the volunteer confirms permission is valid, the image will be restored. Thank you. --SCP-2000 09:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Another one for my "evil crats" image collection

"Them vile admins, are them so bad to we": https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/05/We_no_talk.png/1500px-We_no_talk.png, <grin>, see also my goat for you above.

More to the point - isn't it denigrating to a class of people?: "Burmese people are very good at lying and the Burmese people use their power to oppress the Mon people. ... We will never be satisfied with the Burmans who are destroying the history of the Mon people. We the Mon people have been lied to by the Burmese in the Successive era times.... The practical evidence is:(1)The Wikipedia main page says Commons is free media, but we do not have freedom, because files were deleted due to Burmese admin evil and we account is blocked..."

Another wanted poster of the villainous oppressive destroying admin

(I holding myself from using other PC terms here: "speech this, speech that" and it is not a report by far. I am just curious how you feel about the above: replace "Burmese" with X, Y or Z group there.)

Also do ping me when you stand for election.


Your fellow "naturally evil 'Burman', no-good (no)admin blocker & abuser & oppressor of the ever innocent uploaders, who may make them 'lose their jobs', etc."

Bows + 玩得开心

Zezen (talk) 02:12, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SCP Foundation fan?

Judging by your username, I assuming you're a fellow fan of the SCP Foundation? Ixfd64 (talk) 20:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overwrite

Thank you, I'm Chinese in Vietnam. I understand Vietnamese math very well. found the old image incomplete and misspelled the terminology. So I downloaded the new addition, and adjusted it to be more suitable. File:Hình tứ giác.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guxiangli Tongguan (talk • contribs) 10:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

你他妈是有什么毛病

为什么紧盯着我的上传? --CCPSupporter (talk) 04:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recently I was given some warning because of using some photos. It was shown that I have violated the copyright. But when I collect those photos there was no watermark or source so I thought it was copyright free. What happened? And before I inserted the photo in the article wikipedia asked if I am the owner of the photo. If I don't say yes, they won't publish it. So I had to say yes.

I have a question. Recently I created a Wikipedia article of a certain TV Series. How to link this article with the other articles this TV series has in other languages?

@Wu Bai X Tong Nian: Hello, no watermark and source does't mean that the file is copyright free. There should be clearly license or sufficient evidence to prove that file is copyright free. See also Commons:Licensing for more information. If you don't have any evidence and are not the owner of these files, then please don't upload these files to Commons. You may upload these files to Chinese Wikipedia or English Wikipedia if these files fulfill their policies.
Furthermore, How to link this article with the other articles this TV series has in other languages? You can read zh:Help:跨语言链接 (Chinese version) or en:Help:Interlanguage_links (English version). Thank you. SCP-2000 05:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Thank You. Wu Bai X Tong Nian (talk) 06:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:2019-07-20 Lennon Wall in Hong Kong book fair(3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roskomnadzor notification

Hello, If the Roskomnadzor notifications continue into 2023, then I am confident that we can add a usage switch to handle the categories (e.g. {{Roskomnadzor notification|2023}}. Best, --Minoa (talk) 06:40, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet Report

@NgaiHing1612 is a sock puppet of @Cheng123xx, please block @NgaiHing1612 , thank you Hmtvie (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Roskomnadzor notification has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A.Savin 14:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]