User talk:Rudana

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:PLAKAT_RAM.jpg

[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 21:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Affandi-Scarecrow.jpg

[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 03:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


Image:Lempad-Watugunung_King.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Lempad-Watugunung_King.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

William Avery 06:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Blanco-Blanco.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Blanco-Blanco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

William Avery 07:04, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi, I like the paintings you've been uploading. Unfortunately, I think they're all still under copyright. In Indonesia copyright lasts 50 years after the painter dies, it will belong to the artist's estate (whoever they left it to in their will, or their relatives if they didn't make one). The person or museum that owns the painting doesn't have the copyright, it's completely separate. You have been putting your own permission on the images, but you need to get permission from the artist (if alive) or their estateand post it to the OTRS system. --Simonxag 02:03, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:SRIHADI-KSATRIA.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:SRIHADI-KSATRIA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

—LX (talk, contribs) 16:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted contents

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello Rudana,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

Image:MODERN INDO.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

  • use in any work, regardless of content
  • creation of derivative works
  • commercial use
  • free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on the Wikimedia Commons. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on the Wikimedia Commons: "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how the Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, sorry. What kind of licensing should I use so it can be posted in Wikimedia ?? Should I post another email to wikimedia common ?? MiekeRudana 17:07, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above notice also applies to Image:Darmika-Balance.jpg, Image:Erawan-Pralayamatra.jpg, Image:Srihadi-Borobudur.jpg, Image:Djirna-Arca.jpg, Image:ITALY AWARD.jpg, Image:Kuwait Exhibition.jpg, Image:KSA-2.jpg, Image:KSA-1.jpg, Image:Djudjul-Arja Dance.jpg, Image:Srihadi-Bedoyo.jpg, Image:Rudana&daughters.jpg, Image:RAM-SITEMAP.jpg, Image:Wianta-Calendar.jpg, Image:Gunarsa-Kumbakarna.jpg, Image:Gunarsa-Magic Bali.jpg, Image:RUDANA & PUTU-2.jpg, Image:RAM logo.jpg, Image:RAM map.jpg, Image:RAM gate.jpg, Image:RAM Cornerstone.jpg, Image:RUDANA-2.jpg, Image:RAM-2.jpg, Image:Yuri-Gorbachev-Budha.jpg, Image:Soki-Balinese village.jpg, Image:Wianta-The Moon&the Cliff.jpg, Image:Affandi-Scarecrow-1.jpg, Image:Srihadi-Rudana.jpg, Image:Srihadi-The Beach.jpg, Image:Affandi-Scarecrow.jpg, Image:RUDANA & PUTU.jpg, Image:KSATRIA SENI.jpg, and Image:PLAKAT RAM.jpg.
Please do not make any further uploads until you have read and understood Commons:Licensing. The deleted images all had permission statements such as "I hereby grant permission for all pictures in the website of www.museumrudana.com to be used publicly for any purposes related to any wiki projects including Wikimedia Commons." (Emphasis mine.)
This permission does not make any mention of the GNU Free Documentation License, as you had claimed. Instead, the permission only explicitly grants permission for the images to be used in a limited context, which is contradictory to the GFDL. According to Commons:Licensing, all images uploaded to Commons must be free for anyone to use in any context. Images with more restrictive permissions than this may be speedily deleted per {{Permission}}, as you have seen.
Another problem with several of your uploads is that they depict or contain copyrighted paintings as a primary subject. Owning a museum which owns a copy of a work (even if it is the original and only copy) is not equivalent to owning the copyright to a work. Only the artist or the legal heirs may issue a licence for such works, so for most of your uploads, any permission issued by the museum or their owner is null and void. Attempting to issue a copyright licence to a work for which one does not hold the copyright is a criminal offence. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:32, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following images did contain a permission to publish the works under the GNU Free Documentation License, but were deleted because the licence was void. Since Nyoman Rudana, who issued the permission statement, appeared in Image:Praying.jpg, Image:KSA2-Syiwa.jpg, Image:Earthquake-Yogya.JPG, Image:IPU2007.jpg, Image:Rudana& Sons1.jpg, Image:Indian Exhib.jpg, Image:Ubud Festival.jpg, Image:China Delegates.jpg, Image:Carter at RAM.jpg, Image:Rudana&Daughters.jpg, Image:Jiang Zemin at RAM.jpg, Image:Upakarti Award.jpg, Image:Blanco.jpg, Image:Soeharto signed.jpg, Image:Cornerstone-1.jpg, Image:Rudana&Wife.jpg, Image:RUDANA-1.jpg, and Image:Book Launching.jpg he clearly did not create those photographs, and he can therefore not issue a licence for them. Only the photographers or the photographers' legal heirs could do that. Additionally, he appeared in Image:Srihadii&Borobudur.jpg and Image:Rudana&Srihadi.jpg, which also prominently featured paintings which he did not create and for which he therefore cannot issue a licence. The licensing permission for such images can only be provided jointly by the painter and the photographer (or their respective legal heirs); see Commons:Derivative works. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other than paintings, all other pictures are from Nyoman Rudana collections and they are allowed to be posted in any wiki projects. Please give example of the letter we should address to wikimedia commons, because we would like to post them again. We accept your reasons for the paintings' copyright, but the rests are Nyoman Rudana's and he has the right to allow it posted in any wiki projects and they should not be deleted. We don't wanna break the lwa but we want to upload the pictures as follows :

Image:ITALY AWARD.jpg, Image:Kuwait Exhibition.jpg, Image:KSA-2.jpg, Image:KSA-1.jpg,Image:Rudana&daughters.jpg, Image:RAM-SITEMAP.jpg, Image:RUDANA & PUTU.jpg, and Image:KSATRIA SENI.jpg. just give us an example of letters so we can upload these pictures again. It is just not fair that we cannot upload any pictures that are in Rudana's own collections. He owns the copyright

Tq. Mieke 125.161.203.34 17:48, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, permission to "post in any wiki project" is not sufficient. Please read Commons:Licensing. Sample permission letters can be found at Commons:Email templates, but do note that only the legitimate copyright holder of a work may issue a licence for it and that appearing in an image or having collected an image does not mean one holds the copyright to it, as explained above. Please do not upload the images again. If you feel that any images were incorrectly deleted or you obtain a permission which you believe changes the situation, please request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests and the situation will be reviewed by an administrator. Do not recreate the images yourself as this may be grounds for blocking. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:16, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you and we will send the undeletion request right away. Can we use GFDL self for the file owns by Rudana's, as most of the old files ( the 19990s pics )scanned from photo albums and the rest I got from him in a CD. We only tried to provide as many informations as possible but we just don't p[articularly aware of what we should or should not write regarding licensing. Sorry for my poor English. **Mieke**125.161.203.34 18:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only works you should use {{GFDL-self}} for are works which you created yourself. Please read Commons:Licensing as I've asked repeatedly. It answers the questions you ask. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some pictures with Rudana on them were taken using his own camera, taken by his son, family members or other persons or staffs, so basically he's the one who can issue the license because he owns the pics and he's the subject in the pics. I'm sure he didn;t remembe rone by one who took each picture especially ones using his own camera.** Mieke** 125.161.203.34 18:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, one cannot licence the works of one's family members if they are still alive. One does not become the copyright holder of an image by appearing in it. One does not become the copyright holder of an image by owning the camera with which it was taken. One does not become the copyright holder of an image by forgetting who actually created it. Only the author of the work (or their legal heirs if the author is dead) can licence his or her own works. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]
Warning Please do not upload any more images with Wikimedia-only permissions.

Also note that only the legitimate copyright holder (the artist/photographer or their legal heirs) can issue a licence to their works and that it is a criminal offence to make any licensing claims which have not been explicitly approved by the copyright holder.

If you continue to upload images with Wikimedia-only permissions, you will be blocked from making further uploads. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

[edit]

Hi, sorry I can not answer your question on Commons:Undeletion requests. But I wrote you a reply where you might get answer. Regards, Fred J 22:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rudana&oldid=15083635"