User talk:Roysfoto
Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--LegobotOperatortalk 11:58, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Stenedorp.078roysfoto.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stenedorp.078roysfoto.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Stenedorp.078roysfoto.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
4028mdk09 (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments Belgium
[edit]Hey, leuk dat je meedoet. Ik zag dat je al een heleboel afbeeldingen hebt toegevoegd. Er zijn trouwens meerderemensen die meedoen met foto's vanuit Oostende...
Ik hoop dat alles vlot werkt en dat je nog foto's online zult plaatsen :-) Als je met een vraag zit kan je ze stellen op de overlegpagina.
PS: je kan ons volgen op Twitter, of op website
MADe (talk) 17:24, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo Roy, Op Wikipedia en Commons is het beleid dat watermerken of andere zichtbare aanduidingen op foto's die niet behoren tot wat er origineel op de foto staat, in principe niet gewenst zijn. Ze ontsieren enorm de foto en voor dergelijke informatie dient de EXIF-data van een bestand. Wikipedia heeft als doel om een neutrale encyclopedie vorm te geven, waarbij zij acht dat foto's met watermerken die neutraliteit negatief beïnvloeden, een foto dient gewoon een foto te zijn. De informatie over licentie en auteur horen niet in de foto zelf dus thuis. Daarnaast beperken watermerken ook het mogelijke hergebruik van foto's, terwijl we juist als doel hebben om een encyclopedie te maken waarvan alle onderdelen opnieuw te gebruiken zijn en op die manier de wereld mogelijkheden te bieden in plaats van te beperken. Het wordt daarom sterk aangemoedigd dat u de foto's upload zonder watermerk, door u geüploade foto's met watermerk kunnen beter vervangen worden, dus als u de originelen zou willen uploaden bespaart dat ons werk en moeite en doet dat uw foto het meeste recht. Zou u de foto's waarop u een watermerk heeft geplaatst alsnog zonder watermerk willen uploaden? Alvast bedankt! Groetjes - Romaine (talk) 02:34, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
sorry, had het te laat gezien, is met een batch, zal proberen opnieuw te laden, bedankt.
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Roysfoto,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:48, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope
[edit]
Herby talk thyme 11:15, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Strand van Oostende.JPG was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Image:Montgomerydok Oostende.JPG was uncategorized on 4 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
File:56978-drie-gapers,.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |