User talk:Rotkraut/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 14:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Merci pour la salutation. Je ne suis pas vraiment un nouveau venu, je suis là depuis un peu plus d'une année. Mais bon, mieux vaut tard que jamais. :) --Rotkraut 19:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Funny!
It's funny, now I can see how much you really care and the other user who voted "to keep" that image File:Jacivelasquez.JPG, maybe the uploader is your boyfriend, friend or some, it's comical, well honestly I don't care my images at all, as you know I can do the same with your images, but I'm not like that, good luck!.--Celestial (talk) 23:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Soviet Mars probes
Hi Rotkraut, you've been deleting dozens of Soviet Mars Probe images [1] because they apparently were blatant copyvios. I don't know how the images looked like, but I have some suggestions for how they're free images anyway.
- Soviet Union had an exhibition of Mars probe replicas at VDNKh at a Moscow suburb. Perhaps a NASA photographer shot images of Mars probes there?
- In 1975 the US and Soviet spacecraft Apollo-Soyuz made a rendezvous in space. Prior to that NASA employees went to USSR and could have taken images of the technical backups in an atmosphere of cooperation.
- The Soviet Union didn't recognized copyright so USSR images are free.
- Have a nice day. --Necessary Evil (talk) 07:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- First of all, i did not delete any image. I'm not an admin, so i don't have the power to delete images. But i indeed filed the deletion request you are refering to. Some comments on your suggestions:
- Even if there may be a theoretical possibility for the images to be created by a NASA employee—i still do not believe this—this is irrelevant. For {{PD-USGov-NASA}} to apply, we need to know that the images are created by a NASA employee.
- These images came from the NASA web site, i checked this for each of the images. On none of the NASA description pages was any statement that the images were created by NASA. The NASA webservers host lots of non-PD images and there is an explicit warning hint in the license template {{PD-USGov-NASA}} on this issue.
- Some of the images were credited to Russian sources at the NASA web pages. At least for these images we know for sure that they are not PD-USGov-NASA.
- Ex-USSR images are not in the PD, see {{PD-Soviet}} for details.
- --Rotkraut (talk) 16:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- First of all, i did not delete any image. I'm not an admin, so i don't have the power to delete images. But i indeed filed the deletion request you are refering to. Some comments on your suggestions:
Thanks
I just wanted to say thank you for cleaning up after my botched translations at COM:POTD. It has been a decent amount of time since I've done translation from English to German, so hopefully you don't mind too much as I plan to continue translating the captions. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome! And please, keep translating the image captions! In any case it's better to have a translation with some minor issue then to have no translation at all. --Rotkraut (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Commons user,
We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français ! In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français. We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 23:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC) |
Moin, moin, ich sah gerade das du das Quality-Update umgehend revertiert hast. Ich war der Ansicht, dass das Bild nach der Bearbeitung noch besser geworden war und ersetzte es durch die neue Version. Es lag mir fern den Erschaffer des Bildes dadurch in irgendwelcher Form zu 'schädigen'.
Ich bin mir sicher, dass dies von dir auch nicht so empfunden wurde, aber die Erfahrung hat mich gelehrt, dass es im Wiki-Universe vereinzelt solche Mitglieder gibt. Aus diesem Grund hoffe ich auf diesem Wege einem evtl. Sturm im Wasserglas entgegenzuwirken. Nichts für ungut.--1970gemini 22:21, 14 Oct. 2011 (UTC)
- Bei Geschmacksfragen kann man natürlich unterschiedlicher Meinung sein. Aber in dem Fall, das Bild mit Bonbonfarben überpinselt, die mit einem realistischen Anblick nun wirklich nicht mehr viel zu tun haben, nee, sorry, eine Verbesserung kann ich darin beim besten Willen nicht erkennen.
- Ich habe auch gesehen, daß Du diese Art von „Quality-Updates“ auch bei vielen anderen Bildern vorgenommen hast. Zumeist in ähnlichem Stil, mit völlig unrealistischen, poppig bunten Farben. Ich möchte Dir nahelegen, mit solchen Aktionen zurückhaltender zu sein. Ich bin vermutlich nicht der einzige, der darin keine Verbesserung sieht.
- Ich möchte aber auch anerkennen, daß Du gleich hier auf meiner Diskussionseite das konstruktive Gespräch gesucht hast und daher auch ausdrücklich annehmen, daß Du in gutem Willen gehandelt hast. Ich hoffe daher, daß Du mir meinene deutlichen Worte nicht übel nimmst. Also, wie Du selbst sagst: Nichts für Ungut! --Rotkraut (talk) 21:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, INeverCry 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)