User talk:Romanceor

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
fr-2
Cette personne peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire de français.
en-2
This user is able to contribute with an intermediate level of English.
es-2
Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel intermedio de español.


Click to see my photographs.
Click to see my photographs.


category

www

  • Wikipédia-fr |      • My pictures | 
  • Wikimedia Commons |  


English: (missing text)

Welcome on Romanceor user talk page on Wikimedia Commons.

My pictures are available on the French Wikipedia, as a talk page about them.
You can also consult :

Featured Pictures (logs) — Category
Quality Images (logs) — Category
Valued Images (logs) — Category


Français : (missing text)

Bienvenue sur la page de discussion de Romanceor sur Wikimedia Commons.

Mes photos sont disponibles sur la Wikipédia francophone, ainsi qu'une page de discussion à leur sujet.
Vous pouvez aussi regarder mes

Images remarquables (logs) — Category
Images de qualité (logs) — Category
Images de valeur (logs) — Category


  Romanceor [parlons-en]


Catégorisation

[edit]

Merci de catégoriser tes photos, si on ne peut pas les trouver elles risquent de ne pas beaucoup servir...

Gonioul 10:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

En principe je les mets directement sur une page de Wikipédia, mais il est vrai qu'elles pourraient servir à des articles auxquels je n'ai pas pensé, voire à des Wikipédia dans d'autres langues.
Peux-tu me donner un exemple en catégorisant une photo, afin que je puisse faire les autres ?
Cordialement, Romanceor 13:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Je peux juste de donner celles que j'ai catégorisée Image:Station de métro Porte de Vincennes à Paris en restauration.jpg, vu que je surveille les modifs du projet transpors en ile-de-france. Image:Terminus du T3.jpg a également été catégorisée par un autre membre du même projet.
Après c'est sûr il faut chercher et c'est pas toujours évident, mais au pire si tu mets la photo dans une catégorie large (genre métro de paris au lieu de la ligne), y'aura toujours des gens intéressés par le sujet qui détailleront, ça permet déjà d'écrémer.
Ça sert certes à d'autres articles auxquels tu n'aurais pas pensé, mais cela sert aussi à aider les wikipedia des autres langues à trouver des illustrations! Et ce n'est pas parce qu'une photo n'est pas utilisé sur fr par exemple parce qu'elle est considérée comme moins intéressante ici, qu'elle ne pourrait pas l'être pour une autre langue qui trouverait l'image plus caractéristique vu d'ailleurs...
Gonioul 23:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merci pour tes conseils fort judicieux. Existe-t-il une page qui liste toutes les catégories présentes sous Wikimedia sous forme d'arborescence ? Cela permettrait de beaucoup faciliter le choix de la catégorie. Romanceor 12:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
La racine des photos est là: Category:Categories mais j'ai peur que ça ne t'aide pas beaucoup...
Le plus simple est de faire une recherche pour trouver un mot clé en se basant sur une photo existante approchant le ou les thèmes...
Gonioul 14:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images remarquables

[edit]

Bonjour, j'ai proposé une de tes photos comme image remarquable et je pense que d'autres de tes photos mériteraient aussi cette reconnaissance. Cordialement. --B.navez 16:12, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour cette proposition à laquelle je tâcherai de faire honneur. Surtout n'hésite pas à faire un tour sur ma page d'utilisateur Wikipédia réservée aux photos pour en découvrir de nouvelles dans un classement approprié. Romanceor 23:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Candidates

[edit]

I figured I would mention this before one of the less cordial members does. It's generally frowned upon to nominate more than a few pictures in a single day. I doubt most people would mind 5 or 6 at a time, but you posted 15. This is mentioned in the guidelines at the top of the page.

Nice pictures, if you have any questions feel free to post on my talk page. Calibas 01:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I didn't notice that ; I just figured it was a good way to work on those images, making them better. I'll slow down nominations for now on. Romanceor 04:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image candidate · Image:Grand Trianon.jpg

[edit]

Hi, Thanks for your comments on my photos. About this one, this is the original picture, and these colors are real. Romanceor 17:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Romanceor. Welcome to my talk.
Not retouched: If so, did you use proper white-balance when time you shoot this? I seem still that slightly too amber (and tilt).
And... You could have needn't to put nomination template to User:talk. This is used only QI candidates [1] ;) _Fukutaro 10:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The photo has been take arround 19h. Could it be the sunset that gives you this impression ? Romanceor 12:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image candidate · Image:La Tour Eiffel surplombant Paris.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour. Merci beaucoup déjà pour le temps que tu me consacres, ce qui me permet d'essayer d'améliorer mes photos.
Il y a un de tes refus que je ne comprends pas bien : c'est celui de la Tour Eiffel. Le but de la photo étant de montrer l'imposance du monument, n'en montrer qu'une partie augmente encore l'effet de grandeur, et notamment avec des immeubles de plusieurs étages en premier plan. Il s'agit par ailleurs d'une vision assez peu commune de la célèbre tour, aussi me semble-t-il que l'image acquiert par là même une valeur relative à son originalité.
Peux-tu m'en dire davantage ? Bien cordialement, Romanceor 18:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Euh, non. Vraiment :) Les immeubles sont coupés, on n'en voit que le haut. La Tour est coupée aussi. Pour montrer l'imposance du monument, il faudrait que le monument « écrase » les immeubles, or ici c'est la Tour qui est écrasée, coincée entre le haut et le bas de la photo. Mais ne t'inquiète pas, si d'autres photographes ne sont pas d'accord, ils pourront engager une discussion (c'est l'avantage du processus des QI). guillom 08:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bon. Je referai cette photo un jour. Romanceor 12:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Viandox.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Viandox.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

guillom 08:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sharp

[edit]

Pour répondre à ta question sur IRC, dans le contexte, "sharp" signifie "net". "Not sharp and CCW tilt" se traduit par "Manque de netteté et penche vers la gauche" (CCW est l'abréviation de "counter-clock wise", "dans le sens inverse des aiguilles d'une montre").

Bonne continuation. Rama 10:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Merci pour ton explication qui m'a permis de corriger cela. Cordialement, Romanceor 12:38, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Nomination

[edit]

Dear Romanceor. I hope that you do not oppose of nominating your photo "Vendeuse d'arachides.jpg" as a Fetured Picture candidate. Quite simply, excellent work and stunning photo. I really hope that it is accepted as FP. It should be. --Thermos 17:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much ; I didn't want to do it myself. More of this kind of pictures are coming. --Romanceor 17:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Glad to see that your image achieved FP-status. Congratulations! --Thermos 14:48, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for the nomination of my first FP promotion. Why didn't I have a template advising me of the promotion in my user talk page ? Romanceor 23:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bandeau de permission

[edit]

Luc Viatour,
Nouvel arrivant sur Commons, c'est en regardant vos clichés que j'ai vu le bandeau de "permission" que vous apposez à l'upload de chacune de vos photos. Je vous informe humblement par la présente que j'ai plagié celui-ci pour effectuer la même démarche pour l'ensemble de mes contributions photographiques.
Vous remerciant wikimicalement, Romanceor 15:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bandeau de permission (réponse)

[edit]

Pas de problème pour l'utilisation du Bandeau que j'ai moi même picoré dans d'autres présentations pour faire un mixe ;)

C'est pratique les systèmes libres ;) --Luc Viatour 04:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Size

[edit]

Hi, I don't understand what you modified in this picture to change the size like that... Is that a better JPEG compression ? Or something else ? Romanceor 15:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I merely removed a lot of noise, which was taking a lot of real estate ;). The files I post are always compressed with a mere 5%. Cheers. Lycaon 16:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Template

[edit]

Many thanks for the nomination of my first FP promotion. Why didn't I have a template advising me of the promotion in my user talk page ? Romanceor 23:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw you have it ; was it an error or the author of the pictures isn't advised by templates ? Romanceor 23:22, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds weird. Really. You should definitely get the "FP Promotion" tag on your talk page, which incorporates a thumb of your image and says something like:
"The image has been promoted to Featured picture
The image Image:FringillaCoelebsFemale.jpg, which was nominated by Benh at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FringillaCoelebsFemale.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so."
Actually, If you look above, you can see that kind of tags on two of my images, which were nominated as FP by other Commons users (see FP tags of Chaffinch from 10 May 2007 and Mute Swan from 20 March 2007). So, appropriate tag definitely exists.
Perhaps yous should wait something like a week and if the tag doesn't appear, contact some Commons administrator? At least I didn't ask for the tags myself, they simply appeared one day. I suppose that verifying process is not too quick in this respect. --Thermos 04:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for this complete answer ; I'll wait a week or so and advise a common admin if I still have nothing. Romanceor 16:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

[edit]

No robots doing this job. It is all done by hand and sometimes it fails. Sorry -- Alvesgaspar 16:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I did think it was the FP-Bot ; is the bot so complicated to program ? Romanceor 16:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Noise profiles

[edit]

Hi,

I downloaded noise profiles for Nikon D70 from neatimage.com, and obtained four dozens of *.dnp files. If I take a ISO400 picture exemple, here are my different choices. Where do I have to put these *.dnp files ? I didn't find the right menu in Capture NX, and neither in Photoshop...

  • D70-PreWB-JPEG L-Sharp ML-Normal Curve - NIKON D70 (ISO400; 4bpp; SharpSoft; 3008x2000; WB Default; 1by13s).dnp
  • D70-PreWB-JPEG L-Sharp ML-P&S 4.1 Curve - NIKON D70 (ISO400; 4bpp; SharpSoft; 3008x2000; WB Default; 1by13s).dnp
  • D70-PreWB-RAW NC 4.2-Sharp ML-Normal Curve - NIKON D70 (ISO400; Uncompressed; 3008x2000; WB Default; 1by13s).dnp
  • D70-PreWB-RAW NC 4.2-Sharp ML-P&S 4.1 Curve - NIKON D70 (ISO400; Uncompressed; 3008x2000; WB Default; 1by13s).dnp

Thanks, --Romanceor [parlons-en] 12:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, They work with the help of program named neatimage from neatimage.com. It is free if you want to process one image a time. You can put the profiles in image directory or the directory specified in the options of the program. --Nevit Dilmen 22:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Carapils.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Carapils.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Lycaon 09:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

QI, please...

[edit]

...do not add Commons:Quality_images_candidates to the template path. It is unecessary and just confuses the bot that handles the closing of the candidates. --Dschwen 16:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, that wasn't on purpose ; it is because I use the link to add the votes on my userpage. I'll be more carefull now. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 18:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. My suggestion (to save you some typing) would be: create redirects to the Declien, Promotion, Discuss, Nomination templates in your user space. Then you won't have to change anything after copying from the archive page. --Dschwen 19:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering if it was possible. Discovering templates, I tried today to copy a Wikipédia-fr template in my Commons user page and it perfectly worked. So I'll follow your advise soon ; many thanks anyway. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 19:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but for templates which already are on commons you can even use #REDIRECT --Dschwen 19:41, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's done, thank you. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 13:06, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Valle de la Luna

[edit]

El valle de la Luna esta ubicado en la Pcia de San Juan, en la Republica Argentina, es decir, en la precordillera oriental (lado este), con respecto a la Cordillera de Los Andes. No te confundas macho. Igual mucho no me calienta, porque sabemos que es nuestro,que nos pertenece.

Saludos.

Puedes consultar esta pagina de desambiguación a proposito de los diferentes lugares llamados "Valle de la Luna". --Romanceor [parlons-en] 22:38, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nunca escribo sobre las paginas de Valle de la Luna, en Chile o no ; solamente contribue con fotos de la Valle de la Luna Chilena, que es al lado de San Pedro de Atacama, sobre el teritorio Chileno. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 22:41, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Noise reduction

[edit]

You did an amazing work on this picture ; what software and profiles did you use to remove the noise ? I tried Capture NX, Photoshop, NeatImage... I never had this result, even better than your 12-May compression. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 14:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Passerelle_Simone_de_Beauvoir_de_nuit.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:Passerelle_Simone_de_Beauvoir_de_nuit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ikiwaner (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People by alphabet

[edit]

There shouldn't be any image in that category (only sub-cats and pages), so I remove your pictures from it. --Eusebius (talk) 11:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Comment est-ce que je peux catégoriser un portrait si la catégorie générale People by alphabet n'a pas la sous-catégorie correspondante ? Dois-je créer la catégorie ? Si oui comment faire ? et si non quelle est l'alternative ? --Romanceor [parlons-en] 11:50, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, la création de catégorie (elle-même bien catégorisée) semble appropriée. Mais tu n'as pas attendu ma réponse, tant mieux :-) --Eusebius (talk) 12:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
En effet, il m'a semblé que c'était la meilleure chose à faire. Merci pour ton aide. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 12:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{Personality rights}} (User talk:guillom)

[edit]

Bonjour,
Dois ajouter ce bandeau à toutes mes images où l'on voit des visages ? Et sinon pourquoi la flûtiste a eu la priorité ?
Merci, Romanceor [parlons-en] 12:22, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oui, c'est mieux ; normalement tu ne devrais publier que des photos de personnes publiques dans leur exercice dans des lieux publics. Le modèle {{Personality rights}} est donc indispensable. La flûtiste a eu la priorité car je suis tombé sur son image, tout simplement :) guillom 13:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Est-ce que c'est vrai même dans le cas de manifestations (de syndicats etc.) et d'évènements comme les conférences etc. ?   Romanceor [parlons-en] 16:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Location

[edit]

Hi, can you tell me where this picture is taken? Greetings Nino (talk) 14:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It had been take in the Brijuni islands. (cf. Categories)   Romanceor [parlons-en] 14:57, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos à prendre

[edit]

Bonjour Romanceor,

dis, est-ce que ça t'intéresserait d'aller exercer tes talents de photographe pour Wikipédia ? Je t'explique : avec l'association Wikimédia France, qui soutient les projets Wikimédia, nous avons commencé à monter une opération pour aller prendre des portraits des académiciens et ainsi illustrer leurs articles. Nous pensions le faire à la séance publique annuelle de l'académie, le 27 novembre prochain. Or il se trouve que la photographe qui était prévue pour le faire (Jastrow, tu l'as peut-être déjà croisée sur Commons ?) ne peut pas être là finalement. Alors si tu étais disponible... vu ton talent comme portraitiste "à la volée", ça serait génial (il ne s'agit pas de faire des photos posées de chaque académicien, ça serait trop compliqué à organiser). Le truc, c'est qu'il faut une autorisation, et demander celle-ci dans la semaine qui vient. Peux-tu me joindre rapidement pour me dire si ça t'intéresse, si tu peux, etc ? Je suis joignable sur ma page de discussion ou par mail, comme tu préfères. Amicalement, --Serein (talk) 00:47, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

signature

[edit]

Hey Romanceor, you might want to think about making your signature a little simpler. IMO it is way overkill. My bots (QIC/VIC) are not able to parse them , and due to your use of parser-functions(!), they never will be. --Dschwen (talk) 17:23, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For VICs and QICs I'll use the classic --Romanceor [parlons-en] 14:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC) for now on.[reply]
But I prefer to keep the old one for discussion pages. However the template   Romanceor [parlons-en] could fix the horror of editing after me : it's even shorter than any normal signature.
Sincerely sorry for the mess and delay,   Romanceor [parlons-en] 14:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais_&_Pyramide_du_Louvre.jpg

[edit]
File:Palais_&_Pyramide_du_Louvre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eusebius (talk) 11:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File:Italie 2.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Italie 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Due to COM:FOP, we'll have to count this as a derivative work that cannot be on Commons. -ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cinémathèque française (détail).jpg

[edit]
File:Cinémathèque française (détail).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Coyau (talk) 22:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cobblestone reparing.jpg

[edit]

Bonjour,

merci d'indiquer avec plus de précision l'endroit (la rue par exemple) où la photo a été prise. La catégorie Category:Paris est une catégorie mère et par conséquent ne doit pas contenir de média. Cordialement

Benchaum (talk) 07:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
Ne connaissant pas la rue en question, j'ai préféré le mettre dans la sous-catégorie Category:Works in Paris.
Cordialement,   Romanceor [parlons-en] 07:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cats

[edit]

Salut Romanceor . Could you please categorize your featured/quality/valued images as here? Thanks. Lycaon (talk) 13:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done : Category:Photographs by Romanceor.   Romanceor [parlons-en] 14:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cycliste sur le pavé de la place d'Italie à Paris, un jour de neige.

[edit]

To be used in the Otago Daily Times (en). Thanks.

Award :-)

[edit]

Many thanks fot this award. Mooved to w:fr:Utilisateur:Romanceor/awards.

File:Balisique Saint Marc de Venise facade door 1.jpg : à renommer ?

[edit]

Bravo pour cette distinction ! J'en ai profité pour ajouter à la fois cette photo et la mention du portail dans les articles sur la basilique dans les wikipédias française (galerie) et italienne (plein texte). Juste une remarque : le fichier devrait être renommé. En effet, son nom commence par "Balisique" actuellement, au lieu de "Basilique"... --Myrabella (talk) 11:58, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah oui, en effet, l'image pourrait être renommée. Et avec un "San Alipio" au lieu de "facade door 1" ça peut être bien aussi. Cependant, j'ai ouï dire qu'il était assez compliqué de renommer une image... En tout cas il faut un admin.   Romanceor [parlons-en]
Bonjour, Le plus simple serait que tu en fasses la demande sur le Bistro. Un admin la prendra en charge. --Myrabella (talk) 09:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai corrigé une ou deux coquilles pour le nouveau nom et, hum, il vaut mieux parler en français sur ce Bistro, il est fait pour ça! --Myrabella (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:1860 Anonyme Un vétéran et sa femme Ambrotype.jpg

[edit]

Wonderful photograph File:1860 Anonyme Un vétéran et sa femme Ambrotype.jpg. I removed the claim you added [2] that it shows an "American Civil War" (1861-1865) veteran. Years do not fit with description. Is there more information in print or at a web source? Thank you. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 03:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have more information. The picture is from the 1860s, and not from 1860. For the medal I don't know. He's a veteran, that's the only sure thing.   Romanceor [parlons-en]
Thank you. Yes, I think the man is not a young soldier, and his war was years before the photo. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 22:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel_de_Oliveira_répondant_à_Antonio_Tabucchi_(2008.07.03)-Romanceor.jpg

[edit]

As you ask in the description page of this file, I have used this file in my personal blog, provided Attribution and credits. Thank you four your great work: --Gustavocarra (talk) 11:03, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the interest and advise.   Romanceor [parlons-en] 14:20, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Exposure 1 second.jpg

[edit]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Exposure 1 second.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Jappalang (talk) 05:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mask baule3-romanceor.jpg

[edit]

Salut,

je crois que quelque chose n'a pas marché quand tu as uploadé File:Mask baule3-romanceor.jpg, il manque les informations dans template. Est-ce tu aurais par hasard plus d'informations sur ces masques ? Ca serait utile de savoir d'où ils viennent, de quand ils datent et où ils sont exposés, et idéalement d'avoir les numéros de cote.

Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 19:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,
Pour ce qui est du fichier l'erreur a été corrigée.
Les masques sont photographiés au Burkina Faso, mais beaucoup sont importés. Leur provenance est donc incertaine pour la plupart. Quelques uns sont d'ores et déjà catégorisés dans Category:Masks by country, mais pour les autres il me faudrait de l'aide afin d'identifier leurs origines respectives.
Y a-t-il une page sur Wikimedia où je puisse trouver ce genre d'aide ? Je sais que cela existe pour les plantes et les animaux notamment, mais n'ai pas encore trouvé pour l'artisanat. (Internet étant très instable ce soir l'IRC m'est inaccessible.)
  Romanceor [parlons-en] 23:17, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mask_baule3-romanceor.jpg

[edit]

P.s.: If you know please add some more info about the location, what museum is this? --Martin H. (talk) 20:26, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't a museum : it's a personnal collection. I'm looking for help to identify origin of some of its.   Romanceor [parlons-en] 00:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Cant help you with this, but maybe you can create a subpage with a gallery or with sections for individual files in your user namespace and link to that userpage with an invitation to participate (e.g. "help identifying this mask, participate in [[user:Romancoer/unidentified masks#File:mask foo1-romancoer.jpg]]"). Maybe you can encourage visitors to participate - but dont expect much participation, regretably there isnt much activity in such attempts. --Martin H. (talk) 16:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advise. Here is the result.   Romanceor [parlons-en] 11:56, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subject : ? Ethnic group : ? Country : Burkina Faso
    Subject : ?
    Ethnic group : ?
    Country : Burkina Faso
  • Subject : ? Ethnic group : ? Country : Burkina Faso
    Subject : ?
    Ethnic group : ?
    Country : Burkina Faso
  • Subject : Elephant Ethnic group : ? Country : Côte d'Ivoire
    Subject : Elephant
    Ethnic group : ?
    Country : Côte d'Ivoire
  • Subject : Monkey Ethnic group : ? Country : ?
    Subject : Monkey
    Ethnic group : ?
    Country : ?
  • Subject : ? Ethnic group : ? Country : Burkina Faso
    Subject : ?
    Ethnic group : ?
    Country : Burkina Faso
  • Subject : Aries Ethnic group : ? Country : Burkina Faso
    Subject : Aries
    Ethnic group : ?
    Country : Burkina Faso
  • Subject : Chameleon Ethnic group : ? Country : Burkina Faso
    Subject : Chameleon
    Ethnic group : ?
    Country : Burkina Faso
  • Subject : Owl Ethnic group : ? Country : Burkina Faso
    Subject : Owl
    Ethnic group : ?
    Country : Burkina Faso

    • image use

    [edit]

    Hi Roman,

    Just letting you know that I'm using several of your images for my educational site, Essential Humanities, on the "Medieval/Early Modern Sub-Saharan Art" page (http://www.essentialhumanities.net/artw14.html).

    Thanks for making these images available :)

    Ewangowan (talk) 20:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Bonjour, I have used one of your images--with credit on a Blog about a lecture I gave at a local public library. Alice Price (http://www.alice-price-reframing-art.net/upper-dublin-public-library/) Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.99.122.120 (talk) 13:30, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    [edit]
    bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
    Warning sign
    This media may be deleted.
    Thanks for uploading File:Panneau Passirac.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

    If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

    If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

    Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

    No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    File source is not properly indicated: File:1860 Anonyme Un vétéran et sa femme Ambrotype.jpg

    [edit]
    العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
    Warning sign
    This media may be deleted.
    A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1860 Anonyme Un vétéran et sa femme Ambrotype.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

    If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

    If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

    Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

    AndreasPraefcke (talk) 08:51, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Notification about possible deletion

    [edit]
    Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

    If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

    Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
    Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

    Affected:

    And also:

    Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

    Rodrigolopes, please see that both files have ORTS permissions. Thank you.  Romanceor [parlons-en]

    File:Parinacota volcano in .jpg

    [edit]
    File:Parinacota volcano in .jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

    If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

    Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
    Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

    Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Parinacota volcano in.jpg

    [edit]
    File:Parinacota volcano in.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

    If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

    Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
    Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

    Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Using Your photograph of a barrel organ

    [edit]

    I make very simple music videos to my music. Thank you for this barrel organ picture. This is perfect. Yours sincerely, 

    Paavo Hakulinen

    paavo.hakulinen@gmail.com Paavo Hakulinen (talk) 16:09, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Romanceor&oldid=542685296"