User talk:Roderich Kahn
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
Benutzerbeiträge
[edit]Hallo Roederich Kahn, unter de:Hilfe:Benutzerbeiträge ist das Werkzeug nochmal genauer erklärt. Bei weiteren Fragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung. -- sk (talk) 14:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Special spherical coord 01.png
- File:Actinide Masses 03.svg
- File:Energie Bohr Radius 01.png
- File:Fission Products Masses 02.png
- File:Actinoide Masses 02.png
Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Horst Bartnig Atelier 2011 RK01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Hermann Gloeckner 1974 RK01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Werner Schmidt in Pirna 2009 RK01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Landgrafs in Rossendorf 1998 RK01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Martin Sg. (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Georg Schöne 1952.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Georg Schöne 1952.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Georg Schöne 1952.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 10:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Bad Elster Das heilende Radon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Grassel123 (talk) 16:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Das Foto ist keine Werbung für "Das heilende Radon", zumindest nicht in Wikipedia, sondern ein Blick in die reale Welt. Es gibt in Zentraleuropa 12 Radonbäder: "Ein Ursache-Wirkungsmechanismus, der eine mögliche positive Wirkung von Radonkuren erklärt, ist bislang nicht bekannt. Dennoch berichten Patienten von deutlichen Minderungen ihrer Beschwerden. Diese Diskrepanz zwischen subjektivem (Patienten)Empfinden und objektiver (wissenschaftlicher) Erklärung ist noch nicht zufriedenstellend erklärt." Sollten wir das in der WP verschweigen? Wenn wir alles Pseudowissenschaftliche aus der Wikipedia entfernen würden, wäre sie viel schlanker. Das Foto ist seit dem 22. Dez. 2017 in der WP und sollte dort bleiben. --Roderich Kahn (talk) 15:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)