User talk:Rikaris
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
I moved your category
[edit]Hi, Liné1,
I just would like to tell you I moved your Category:Corculum cardissa from Category:Cardiidae into the sub-category Category:Corculum that I created. Since I noticed all sub-categories in Cardiidae were named after genuses, not species, I tried to comply with this reasonable way of organizing things. Hope you understand.--Rikaris Talk 07:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hihi, you did it right. I also prefer to have only genus categories in family categories.
- But (there is always a but ;-)) some people don't like categories with only one item. Here it is the case: Corculum is monotypic, meaning that it has only one species.
- If someone bothers you about this monotypic problem, you can answer that it is very difficult to know if a taxon is monotypic as most of the websites we use (ITIS, Mammal Species of the World (2005)...) are not aware of prehistoric species.
- Cheers Liné1 (talk) 08:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- For example Category:Ginkgo seems monotypic as there is only one species Category:Ginkgo biloba. That in fact there are other fossil species of Gincko. Liné1 (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hum, I haven't thought about that... The thing is, there are some rules for categorisation at the Portuguese Wikipedia saying you cannot create categories for species, and I naively assumed they would be the same anywhere else. As this is not the case, then please, feel free to revert my changes if you want. I'm quite new here, and should've known better than start messing around with other people's work... Cheers --Rikaris Talk 01:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- I won't revert your cat as I really like it.
- There is also a french rule against species cat. But here we want to sort articles AND photos. That is why species cat are highly recommended.
- Cheers Liné1 (talk) 05:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- For example Category:Ginkgo seems monotypic as there is only one species Category:Ginkgo biloba. That in fact there are other fossil species of Gincko. Liné1 (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
File:Tetsujin 28 go.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
--Jappalang (talk) 15:08, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
File:Princess Sapphire.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|