User talk:Richiex/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Re: your critical commentary on my talk page

Please see User talk:Outsider80#Addressing 2nd critical commentary of User:Richiex, I have addressed your concerns point-by-point. Thank you, Outsider80 (talk) 12:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Self-pics (your concerns about descriptive cats removed, and disparity w/ female self-pics)

I have added back the descriptive categories to the self-pics (into new categories for such purpose). Before when you were referring to the "descriptive" categories being removed, I thought you were referring to cirucmcision/uncircumcision miscategorizations and not the foreskin/erection/etc. categories (my bad). Per your concerns I have also added corresponding self-picture categories for females.

Separating out self-pictures from the main "Penis"/etc. categories allows both sides to 'have their cake and eat it too'. If a user wishes to browse self-pics, they are there (and organized into various categories (foreskin, pubic hair, shaved, etc). If a user is not looking for self pics (looking for a line drawing, or a non self-picture photograph), then those images they are looking for are not drowned out/overwhelmed in the main category by 900 self pics. (Otherwise 900 self-pics would overwhelm and drown out the diagrams, charts, and photos that aren't self-pics) Hopefully this solution is acceptable to both sides. Outsider80 (talk) 14:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Administrator User:Martin H. has summarily deleted the categories without any prior discussion. Pursuant to DGAF I no longer GAF. If Commons does not care if it becomes a massive repository of low-quality home-made images of its users' penises, I DGAF. I have more important things to deal with. No response to this message is necessary, and no further messages to my talk page are necessary. You will not see me in these topic areas again. Thanks, Outsider80 (talk) 18:15, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I find this user's contributions invaluable and vital to wikipedia. 207.237.33.36 00:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

images of cryptorchidism

Hi, can you confirm that these images are either of your, or of an adult male, as I have placed them on a page to illustrate the phenomenon.

Do you know of any decent images that clearly show hypospadias on a penis that is not erect?

I am also looking for any other images of atypical genitalia for the page in question, male, female or otherwise - if you know of any.

MishMich (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I confirm that all my images are of adult persons. I suggest that you might find some images from medical sites, Google Image Search, Flicr etc. Just be careful with possible copyright restrictions. Let me know if you need more cryptorchidism or anorchia images. Richiex (talk) 10:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

categorization, re: human anatomy & sexuality

hi; i notice that you reverted my very carefully constructed categorizations of the files you contributed to wmc as "useless categories"

with respect i have to dusagree quite strongly with htat characterization.

i am attempting to re-organize the "sex" material on wmc into a set of logical, searchable categories, that can be taken seriously. no one else has bothered, & the work is certainly needed

wmc's system of organization, taken as a whole, is rather poor; the sexual/anatomical material's organization, is extremely poor; & most of what is happening in the area seems to be an ongoing battle of wills between the pro & anti-censorship camps.

i have some knowledge of organizing archives, databases, etc & even a bit of a background in library science.

if you want an example of why you category revert is unhelpful, consider this:

near where i live, there is a veteranary school; they teach animal surgery, among other things. a file photo, from the school, of say, the shaved genitalia of a dog, pre & post op, would belong in the category "shaved genitalia (male)'; however simply dumpiung all images of shaved male genitalia into one category ilke that would 'NOT result is a searchable, useful database; it would result in a useless mess.

i'm very much anti-censorship & trying to rework this organization of this collection of material into something that can be taken seriously, & will be easier to defend against the people who want to delete all the "dirty" pictures.

if you need help in understanding the system of categories i am creating, or why they are being organized in the way that there are being organized, please contact me.

thenk you, & i hope you will continue to contribute to wmc; specifically, in sorting through this material, i am finding that there are categories where wmc lacks media. once i have the existing material organized, some of the missing categories will become more obvious, & perhaps efforts should be made to fill in what is needed.

Lx 121 (talk) 18:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate your effort, there is some point in what you said. Still I find your system rather complex, I've difficulties to find images that were easily available earlier. If you add new categories, it's fine for me, but please, don't remove existing categories. IMO the images should be available where they are used to be, the categories can easily be removed later, if and when they become obsolete, discordant or unambiguously redundant. Richiex (talk) 08:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


Hello Richiex, why should not the This image are displayed in articles? If it is already in w:de:Penis des Menschen. Greeting 北 方 17:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Male_erogenous_zones.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 14:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

You are a legend for this. (192.0.161.42 02:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC))

File:Male_genitalia,_age_31.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 14:13, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Erect_human_penis,_age_30.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 14:14, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Erecting_human_penis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 14:14, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Female_and_male_genitalia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 14:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Human_sexual_anatony.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eusebius (talk) 14:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Sexual_arousal.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.171.78.118 19:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Glans penis.JPG

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Glans penis.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--smial (talk) 23:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Semen2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--168.122.246.234 23:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the new material. I'd love to discuss your images with you if you would like. Add me on MSN curious23@hotmail.co.uk


File:Male genitalia, partially shaved.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Zimin.V.G. (talk) 13:56, 14 May 2010 (UTC)


File:Male_sexual_arousal.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Burhan Ahmed (talk) 10:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Testicles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.173.207 16:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Penis_size_demonstration.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alberto21 (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Shaved_pubic_area.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FAP (talk) 19:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Visible_erection_through_clothing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alberto21 (talk) 14:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Scrotal_circumference,_adult_male.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

71.237.170.76 18:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Scott talk 18:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback

Thank you for the feedback! I rarely comment on it and very seldom correspond to e-mail requests.

There have been some suggestions that I'm gay and exhibitionist. Well, I'm not gay, exhibitionist to some degree, yes. I think most of us are. Without a slightest tendency to exhibitionism no one would send here images of his or her genitalia.

You have seen almost everything of me, my penis and testicles, you have seen me masturbating and ejaculating. But it's not important or essential that it is MY genitals that you have seen. Every male have similar organs and bodily functions so I want to highlight that my images and videos represents all males, the male gender. These are very natural things, like having a baby or menstruation. In my opinion, sexuality related issues should be more commonplace and there must be available images and videos of decent quality to fulfill the information thirst that people may have due to various reasons.

Based on the feedback I believe that my contributions are useful, informative and educational although some people (mostly narrow-minded) dislike them. I will continue doing contributions (probably rather sparsely) in the future and I'm open to new ideas and suggestions.Richiex (talk) 06:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Testicles of a human male.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Scott talk 15:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Masturbating male.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fitoschido (talk) 21:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Male ejaculation.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim Raschka (talk) 13:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

File:A handjob video.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Citadel48 (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

File:A male masturbating outdoors.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Citadel48 (talk) 22:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

File:A male masturbates testicles through pants and boxer fly.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Citadel48 (talk) 22:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Tenga Egg.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Citadel48 (talk) 22:12, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Uncircumsized male masturbating.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Citadel48 (talk) 22:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Average sized post-pubertal testicle.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

190.197.20.99 23:49, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Just expressing thanks

You have contributed many videos and images to the Wikimedia projects and I would like to thank you for it. Very impressive! I have used the video File:Tenga Egg.webm on the article en:Tenga (company) to illustrate the Tenga Egg product that is described. Alice2Alice (talk) 10:20, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback! I Appreciate that my video is being used. I hope that masturbation gradually becomes less of a taboo, it is a natural thing and commonly practised enjoyable action that we should be able to talk about and show explicitly. I don't mind if others see me masturbating and ejaculating in a video, I'm just showing how manly organs function and how they can be used, erection and ejaculation are natural physiological events that I'm not ashamed of, rather proud of them on behalf of male population. In my opinion this kind of videos should be used more often in articles since they are more informative than images. I'm pleased if my videos are liked and watched from whatever reasons. Those who dislike or see them unenjoyable should still consider them informative or just avoid watching them. Richiex (talk)


I concur, thanks for your efforts. Always checking back for the most recent updates! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 108.18.157.212 (talk) 18:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Hidden testicles.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stephenjudge (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Male masturbation demonstration.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

191.82.250.59 04:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Category:WebM videos of male masturbation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 05:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


Category discussion warning

Category:WebM videos of male ejaculation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--grendel|khan 06:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Mutual masturbation.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

49.197.107.232 12:49, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Testicular and scrotal masturbation.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

49.197.107.232 13:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Testicular masturbation.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

49.197.107.232 13:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

I have a question

Hello, I have a serious question. If you ever see this message, please contact me Thank you. 61.205.104.222 20:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)