User talk:Rhododendrites/2017b

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poetry on the wall at the Angel Island Immigration Station (2) (40205).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:59, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tiburon (50684).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:57, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dove on barbed wire on Angel Island (40067).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Latin name please italic.--Famberhorst 17:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC) Note: I changed it.--Famberhorst 17:49, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue jay in Central Park (81417).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannele (12559).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cannele interior (12545)s.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poetry on the wall at the Angel Island Immigration Station (1) (40206).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is sharp but it's very dark. Could you try to improve this, please? --Basotxerri 16:28, 1 September 2017 (UTC) @Basotxerri: Thanks. I've uploaded a new version. It's lighter, but not a great deal lighter as I want to ensure it keeps a similar appearance to its counterpart. Is this sufficient? Rhododendrites 03:11, 2 September 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:28, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ship in the SF Bay fog (40406).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry

Hey, thanks for this edit. I tried to move this set of images into their own category and I accidentally deleted too many categories. I didn't even notice that it was your picture :-) So, (1) thanks for assuming good faith, and (2) I apologize for accidentally messing your quality image up. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

@Frank Schulenburg: No problem. Yeah, it just looked like an accident. I didn't think you were trying to sabotage my user category system. :) Thanks for updating to the more specific category. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  04:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DACA protest Columbus Circle (90107).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but not all Americans come from immigrants --Michielverbeek 05:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Looking up from SF MOMA (30009).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 05:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Categorization

Thank you for your categorization work on my uploaded images. Very useful. Samat (talk) 21:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

@Samat: And thanks to you for uploading them! I was just digging around for a picture of someone and figured I'd do a bit of organizing in the process. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  21:30, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DACA protest Columbus Circle (90569).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pride NYC 2017 (51897).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ship in the SF Bay fog (40406).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ship in the SF Bay fog (40406).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaillardia in Aspen (91273).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:59, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maroon Bells (11590)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maroon Bells (11553)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden eagle at ACES (11738).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, and good-looking members of two species. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 06:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden eagle at ACES (11809).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now. --Ermell 21:30, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green-Wood Cemetery Chapel (61921).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bee on cornflower in Aspen (91229).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus on subject. -- Ikan Kekek 07:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maroon Bells (11590)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:41, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tragopogon seedhead in Aspen (91270).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 07:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brown-belted bumble bee on Allium in Central Park (81630).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 08:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pride NYC 2017 (52004).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 11:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maroon Bells (11678).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment An imaginary line between the real and reflected points demonstrates deviation from a strict vertical. For example the peaks of the real and reflected pine. And some dust spots or birds at the right top corner.--Aeou 10:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC) @Aeou: Good point.  Done? I've uploaded a new version that addresses these issues, I think. Thanks. Rhododendrites 06:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Now ok. --Aeou 07:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bethesda Fountain (81527).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 04:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maroon Bells (11624).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wonderfully peaceful, certainly a QI and conceivably an FP, but some people might be sticklers for a more nearly pinpoint focus at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 00:15, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyrosoma atlanticum (12256).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, IMO, and certainly interesting. -- Ikan Kekek 01:19, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden eagle at ACES (11830).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 13:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pride NYC 2017 (52028).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. OK with me. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 03:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaillardia on Aspen Mountain (91140).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quince (10889s).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI now. --MB-one 08:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Donald J. Trump Presidential Twitter Library.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please geocode this. Sixflashphoto (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

• @Sixflashphoto: Good point.  Done — Rhododendrites ^talk |  20:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful and Best in scope Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maroon Bells, view from northeast.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rudbeckia occidentalis (western cornflower), efflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. The totality of the plant is not visible, it is necessary to reduce the scope to: efflorescence. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gaillardia pulchella (firewheel), efflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. It could be geocoded --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done here as well. :) thanks — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:35, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
San Diego Natural History Museum, front exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Done missed that. so did the QIC reviewer, apparently. :) perhaps because the parent category is geocoded? eh. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  06:21, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strobilanthes cusia (Chinese rain bell), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

No problem only the flower is clearly visible, reduce the scope to flower. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done thanks again — Rhododendrites ^talk |  06:20, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyrosoma atlanticum, beached.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The animal is not very different in the water but it is no longer in its natural element. Perhaps it would be necessary to add stranded on the beach . --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Updated. How about "beached", which I believe effectively means the same thing. Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  23:44, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:58, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Colletes phaceliae (Phacelia Cellophane Bee), dorsal, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks good to me Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Richard E. Taylor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - I like the original, File:HD.3F.009 (11086446546).jpg, better. Dunno, maybe this one is more useful solely to show him, though? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: I had initially cropped it because, while I like the other one better from a photography standpoint, it didn't display well on the page it was used (I forget which page now). Since then, the cropped version has become significantly more used across projects (not my doing). It would seem odd to say that the one that's valued is the one that people prefer not to use. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - I don't think the reason for VIC is to ratify others' decisions on what to link - they are sometimes wrong (I experienced that in regard to the Chrysler Building, in which Carol Highsmith's photo was best in scope but wasn't most widely linked). However, I'll accept your other reasoning. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cyclanorbis elegans (Nubian flapshell turtle), head.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Only one on Commons and with it being Critically Endangered I don't see it being easy to get a better picture. But if a picture did come up that showed the entire Turtle in good detail I may support that instead. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

   Comment Agree that scope should be narrowed. Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose Unable to give label for this scope. You only see the head. It is necessary to reduce the scope to "head" --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus and Sixflashphoto: Updated scope. Thanks. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

  Agreed. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)*

• @Sixflashphoto: Attention small procedural problem. The scope has changed so the positive votes are deleted. As the scope has changed my oposition is removed. If you agree we must vote again on the bottom. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

   Support Support under proper scope. Sixflashphoto (talk) 17:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tympanuchus phasianellus (sharp-tailed grouse).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Done, although very vague. I didn't take the picture and only know that it was in the Prairie Pothole Region of the US (diameter of about 1000km). Still, I've added a geolocation of the center of the area with a prec value. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Ok is perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia cultivar (70112s).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose shrub (70355).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:07, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monarch butterfly (70385).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 03:36, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Painted lady (70402).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:36, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bee balm seedhead (70424).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good and pleasant quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dahlia cultivar (70093s).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mmmm, nice! Good quality. Would IMO be even better with WB a little bit less blue, but that's a matter of taste. --W.carter 22:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dark purple Trichoglottis (70213s)c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 22:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anteros formosus (Formosus Jewelmark), dorsal view, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best In Scope and I believe everything to be in order -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melissodes tepaneca (Tepanec Long-horned Bee), side view, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Please link to a Commons category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Done Typo. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Watsonia humilis (Pink Bugle Lily), flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Andrena hirticincta (Hairy-banded Andrena), side view, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, and a possible FP, certainly a QI if nominated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Thanks. FP maybe, though not eligible for QI (USGS Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab photo). When I came across its Flickr account, I was tempted to nominate a whole bunch for FP. Maybe still will, though I think some have a strong preference for living specimens, understandably. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  06:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Melissodes apicata, side view, mounted specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carlos Menchaca.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trichoglottis atropurpurea (Dark Purple Trichoglottis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Ceiling

HI there! I see that you nom of that very nice ceiling is going a bit slow. Reading Daniel's comment, I think he's right. Anyway, I did some very delicate tweaking of the photo using gradient filters in Lightroom. I adjusted the color temp of the shadows vs highlights so that they match each other more and used the gradients to get a more homogeneous color/saturation/light/etc in the pic. Also added a bit of light, folks here like that. ;) cf. this. You can find my tweaked version in my Dropbox via this link. It's yours if you want to use it or try to copy the alterations. If you like that version better, you could shut down the current nom and make a new with a tweaked pic. Cheers, --cart-Talk 20:46, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

@W.carter: Slow indeed. I also agree with Daniel's comment, though it's not something I feel confident about fixing. Thanks so much for making these adjustments. I agree it looks better/more uniform now. I'm going to go ahead and just upload that version -- is it possible to export those adjustments in a lightroom file so I can see what you did? No worries if it's a bother.

I'm unclear about best practices for new versions at FPC. Just checked the rules again and didn't find a recommendation. It seems like sometimes people withdraw and renominate, sometimes people create a second section of the same page, etc. Based on your advice, it sounds like you recommend starting anew -- is that a general practice or just in this case? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  21:26, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

It would be bordering on impossible to tell you exactly what I've done, since the gradient filters can't be quantified. It would require a screenshot of the whole setup for each gradient and I'm not up to doing that right now, sorry. The basis for the whole thing though is the use of Split toning, you could check that out in this tutorial. It's useful when you have scenes that are in both shadow and light.

There are no specific rules or ways of nominating a new fixed version of a photo, it's a case by case decision. If the nomination is just a day or so old, and it's high on the list, adding an "Alt version" is usually best. When the nom has slided down the list a bit, it's better to make a new nom since most users seldom revisit noms they have passed over or 'opposed' to before. There are also voters who only show up about once a week and they will miss an "Alt version" if it's added a bit into the voting period. In this case, I think it's better to make a fresh start to shake things up a bit. --cart-Talk 21:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Responding on your talk page to keep threads together — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:MNHN - Les Rhinogrades screenshot 1.png

And also:

• File:MNHN - Les Rhinogrades screenshot 2.png
• File:MNHN - Les Rhinogrades screenshot 3.png
• File:MNHN - Les Rhinogrades screenshot 4.png

Yours sincerely, El Grafo (talk) 09:46, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Rhododendrites, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Guanaco (talk) 01:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Weak votes at FPC

Hi! Please don't use any other voting templates that the three basic ones at FPC ( s, o, neutral ). The bot counting the votes can't read {{weak oppose}} and such. Use the piping instead, like this: {{o|Weak oppose}}, or you can write whatever colorful vote you want. I saw that you had used the 'weak' template in one of your votes, I hade fixed that for you. Cheers, --cart-Talk 09:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

@W.carter: Aha! Thanks for fixing. BTW haven't had a chance to come back to the ceiling/Lightroom yet, but thanks for that. On my way out now to a little wildlife refuge I didn't know existed on an island in Queens. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  14:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

No worries! :) "There is no deadline on the Wiki project." Enjoy your time in the wild. Please tell me a bit about it later, my sister lives on Long Island from time to time, so I'll have to give her a tip about it. --cart-Talk 14:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alexander Hamilton Custom House Collector's Room ceiling (40511s).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alexander Hamilton Custom House Collector's Room ceiling (40511s).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

No problem. I try to help, before that i see how it looks in Adobe PS, then i write a comment. Otherwise, those FPs are least important to me, first, you look to be satisfied with the photo, that should be main. --Mile (talk) 06:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Images in Category:Tejn

Just started Commons:Deletion requests/Images in Category:Tejn based upon the discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/10#File:Tejn noviolence.JPG. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:15, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Silene vulgaris in Aspen (91171).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:01, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Makhtesh Ramon (50785).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Makhtesh Ramon (50785).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sweet William in Aspen (91167).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good lighting and composition, adequate depth of field. Good quality. --Wsiegmund 16:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fulton Center skylight (91420).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fulton Center skylight (91437).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 12:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oculus (91546).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steam stacks at Broadway and Dey (91441).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 08:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fulton Center skylight (91420).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fulton Center skylight (91420).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Hamilton Custom House Collector's Room fireplace (40531s).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Hamilton Custom House Collector's Room panels (40522).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asparagus fern (60431).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bee balm seedhead (70429).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butterfly in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge (41100).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:43, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butterfly in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge (41141).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reeds in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge (41057).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bat box in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge (41119).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! One World Trade Center through the Oculus (91538).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Could possibly be a good FP candidate! --Uoaei1 05:19, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statues in front of the Custom House (40480).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bumble bee on loosestrife in Aspen (91331).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butterfly in Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge (41144).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Governor DeWitt Clinton statue at Green-Wood Cemetery (side) (61924).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. @Rhododendrites: This seems to be the 1855 statue, which makes it PD. May want to add that to the file description. PumpkinSky 02:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great blue heron (70308).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:05, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monarch butterfly (70389).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Jonathunder 01:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Painted lady (70403).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 03:43, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackwell Island Light (41727).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:19, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strophanthus preussii, inflorescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• Not sure if it would be better to restrict the scope more since not all of the plant is visible? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  02:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes. It would be good to reduce the scope to 'inflorecence' --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done thanks — Rhododendrites ^talk |  15:46, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:24, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaillardia in Aspen (91285).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Queensboro Bridge from the south (41957).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments FPC? PumpkinSky 01:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FDR Memorial (42045).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ravenswood Generating Station (41875).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:08, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cornell Tech buildings (42013).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice view. IMO too noisy and CAs. Please check your image. --XRay 06:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Comment A really good image. It´s only a little bit noise in the sky, easy to fix! Go ahead --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)  Comment The CAs should be fixed too. ;-) And it's easy to fix too. --XRay 11:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)  new version uploaded I think I got most of the CA, denoised a little, then denoised the sky more Rhododendrites 17:14, 3 December 2017 (UTC)  Support IMO OK. Just minor green and magenta CAs, good enough. --XRay 20:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:One World Trade Center through the Oculus (91538).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:One World Trade Center through the Oculus (91538).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilac squirrel (80863).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abutilon Biltmore Ballgown (80891).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The left side could be cropped out IMO. --Ermell 07:28, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackwell Island Light (41791).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments FPC? PumpkinSky 01:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)  Comment - Buildings on both sides of the lighthouse look like they need perspective correction. -- Ikan Kekek 08:10, 4 December 2017 (UTC) Temporary  Oppose per my remarks above. -- Ikan Kekek 05:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)  new version uploaded Rhododendrites 07:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)  Support - Construction site still looks like it's leaning a bit, but much better and good enough for QI now, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 08:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Silene vulgaris in Aspen (91171).jpg, not featured

Pity this didn't make it. PumpkinSky talk 03:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little Skate in Bay Ridge (62203).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dyker Lights (62317).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 04:15, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dyker Lights (62299).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support - Good quality IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 04:13, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Little Skate in Bay Ridge (62209).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)