User talk:Ralbegen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ralbegen!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Luisa-porritt (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Luisa-porritt (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please properly use the "source" field

[edit]

Hi Ralbegen,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons! It looks like a file you uploaded to Commons has an invalid entry indicated for its "Source" on File:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election after 2019 (LOESS).svg. It is important that the |Source= field, which is the record of where a file came from, be accurate and as machine-readable as possible so that others can verify its license and be able to reuse the file under the correct terms. For example, sources such as "Me", "Self" or "My camera" should be replaced with the template {{Own}}; sources such as "Google", "The Internet", etc. are not considered valid and may result in deletion of the file. If you did not generate the file yourself, then you may want to revisit the file and be as specific as you can in identifying your source: ideally, this might be a stable link to the exact webpage that the image or file came from, or perhaps the title, year, and page number of the book where you found it (a link to a website in general is not usually considered specific enough, nor is simply restating the name of the author). For guidance on indicating your source please visit the page COM:SOURCE.

Who did the poll? (author) URL to the published data (source). Thank you.Senator2029 07:23, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Senator2029: Thank for getting in touch! The data are opinion polls conducted by a lot of companies, as collated on the English Wikipedia page Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election. Previous graphs used on the page have used "own work" as the source without controversy, so I'm afraid I wasn't aware there was any other expectation. I'd be happy to update the source field, but could you advise me on how best to reflect the use of English Wikipedia as a source? I keep the graph up-to-date with data on there and I've shared the code there so that others can do so if I stop. I would also prefer not to update the source field with a new specific revision link to the page whenever I update the graph, which can be several times a week, if at all possible. Ralbegen (talk) 13:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling next UK election graph

[edit]

Most recent Deltapoll has been entered some weeks into the future, altering the LOESS line of best fit. Best, 136.185.8.62 17:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 07:28, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

People Polling 28/12

[edit]

Hi Ralbegen,

Regarding your UK LOESS graph, I wanted to suggest that the People Polling outlier poll conducted on the 28th December is removed for the time being.

The LOESS obviously is struggling to weight it properly because of the 6 day separation. Because of this, I'm sure you're aware how much of an inaccurate picture this paints, and I've personally seen several social media posts misinterpreting the situation.

Once 1 or 2 more post-christmas polls are released, I'm sure it will fix itself but I think it might be best to remove it until those are released

Thanks, Quinnnnnby (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

Seriously, the work you do updating the poll graph for the next UK general election is amazing. Gopchunk (talk) 22:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that's very kind! Ralbegen (talk) 08:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
Thank you for your work with File:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election after 2019 (LOESS).svg! I was looking at en:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election and realized that the graph was working, in sharp contrast to, well, every other graph across Wikimedia. It is noticed and appreciated! Best, HouseBlaster (talk) 03:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Kulveer Ranger British Sikh Report 2013 (cropped).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Mike Rohsopht (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible help on some graphs?

[edit]

Hey, resident political nerd here, I was wondering if you needed / wanted some help updating or helping to manage some of the graphs you upload :D I've been pretty fascinated with politics (and stats / graphs) for a little while so I'd love to help if you wanted any! Raiiyarai (talk) 12:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bob-Buxton-straight(1) (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bob-Buxton-straight(1) (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 15:31, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Matthew Robinson Conservative Party 2021 (cropped).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Matthew Robinson Conservative Party 2021 (cropped).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 15:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, FYI there is an internal error that is preventing this file from being renamed. The issue has been reported and is being investigated. Hopefully it will be resolved quickly. Thanks for your patience. — ʷiḳỉℳẚṅ₫¡₳ (talk) 02:56, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for letting me know! Ralbegen (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hah, came here to say the same. Four attempts to move the file and all four failed. Odd. // sikander { talk } 🦖 17:40, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think there are too many versions. Maybe you can upload this separately? Possibly with a link to the other files? I don't think it is possible to rename it anymore. Grtz. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 11:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS I don't have a solution for the many links on Wikipedia. As long as the text on Wikipedia is right, it's maybe not such a problem that the filename is not completely correct. - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 11:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your 15:41, 23/06/2024 edit of

[edit]

Hi there, I just wanted to highlight that John Curtice's average of the polls is different to yours in his summary this morning - Lab 40, Con 20, Ref 18. It appears he has included the JL Partners poll we were dicussing in his average. I notice you haven't included it in your table, hence your trend line is incorrect. I hope this information is helpful. Thanks in advance for updating the table - and for all your hard work on this WestminsterWhistleblower (talk) 15:46, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same for this table 15:42 update - File:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election after 2019 (LOESS).svg
Please can you amend both. Many thanks, WestminsterWhistleblower (talk) 15:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opinion polling on the whether the United Kingdom should rejoin the European Union.svg

[edit]

Can you please update this graph? Helper201 (talk) 23:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Albanian parliamentary election

[edit]

Hi Ralbegen, I hope this message finds you well :). I've noticed your expertise in creating graphs of opinion poll results, and I was wondering if you could help me with a specific request. Could you create a graph for the 2021 Albanian parliamentary elections? I believe it would enhance the understanding of the polling data presented in the article. Thank you in advance if you consider my request. Best regards! Iaof2017 (talk) 20:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]