User talk:RajeevRuparell~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, RajeevRuparell~commonswiki!

-- 20:06, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, RajeevRuparell~commonswiki!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image sources

[edit]

Hello! Thank you for uploading some old photos of Toronto. However, it is absolutely essential that you provide the source of all of these images. If you got them online, indicate the website. If you scanned them from a book, indicate the name and date of the publication. It is an important principle around here that we properly source all media. Moreover, it helps eliminate any doubt whatsoever that the images are public domain. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please provide more details about "Construction Magazine" (place of publication, where you found it online/at library, etc.)? These 1909 images are public domain to the extent that they can be verified to be of this age. If there is any doubt (i.e. no source), they will probably get deleted at some point. That would be an incredibly dissapointing result, which I would like to avoid. That's why we need proper sources for all the images you have uploaded. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - thanks again for your message, and appreciate the best practice guidance (I'm fairly new to the wiki universe). I've updated most of the images with a link to the Construction article, which I found at the Toronto Archives and was told by the archivist there that it was in the public domain and okay to use. Others were physical copies found at the hotel, and presumably have been here for a while (I am the current owner/manager of the hotel, and the previous manager had been here for over 20 years - he said that the prints and promotional matchbook go back much further). There are a few digital images from the Toronto Archive website - I'll update these once I can find them again. I'm leaving for vacation for two weeks this Friday, and things are quite busy here before I leave. I'll try to find them all again before then so that I can put in the correct URLs, but please provide us some time to do this before deleting. thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by RajeevRuparell (talk • contribs)
No worries. I can't imagine any of the images will be deleted while you are on holidays. My warnings were more of a pre-cautionary nature, as sometimes we do see deletion requests where there is no source and editors question whether the images are truly from the date provided. The Construction magazine is undoubtedly public domain. As for the physical objects from the hotel, we can deal with those. Since you are the current owner, you can give permission for their use. We'll deal with the details when you are back from holidays. Have a good time. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thanks again for your help. I'll touch base when I get back in late April.

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

22:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

05:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Howard Rees.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Howard Rees.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Praxidicae (talk) 13:50, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]