User talk:Rachimbourg
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
![]() |
File:Romay.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoplus (talk) 04:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:J Lerma.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:J Lerma.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:J Lerma.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:28, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:M Mariscal de Gante.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 19:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Tomas de la Quadra-Salcedo.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Tomas de la Quadra-Salcedo.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tomas de la Quadra-Salcedo.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 20:53, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Info Considering indicated source http://ocw.uc3m.es/derecho-administrativo/instituciones-basicas-del-derecho-administrativo/profesorado (photo?) = CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 (see COM:L for details) + http://www.uji.es/noticies/foto/num&id_a=11385632 (credits: "Autor: Damián Llorens") = http://www.uji.es/xpf/fichero/IMATGES_RESERVORI/11385371/IMG/1.JPG (idential exif). Gunnex (talk) 20:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Suarez et Calvo-Sotelo.png
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Suarez et Calvo-Sotelo.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 20:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Austrian Parliament Diagrams
[edit]Your Diagramms are all wrong, FPÖ and Greens have always been seated in the middle! --193.154.10.231 14:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Je me fiche bien du lieu où s'assoient les députés, ils sont classés idéologiquement, de la gauche vers la droite. – Rachimbourg (talk) 14:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Please, use also {{LicenseReview}} to enable verification. Thanks --Discasto talk 23:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Por favor
[edit]Cuando uses {{Attribution-La Moncloa}}, pon también {{LicenseReview}}. Gracias --Discasto talk 09:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC) PS: veo que no es la primera vez que te lo digo y no parece importarte :-(
- Discuplame, de verdad. No me acuerdo de tu primer mensaje. En el caso contrario, hubiera colocado {{LicenseReview}}. Lo haré a partir de ahora. – Rachimbourg (talk) 10:22, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Perdona por mi tono en el mensaje anterior. Soy muy "sensible" con el tema de La Moncloa. En el pasado me tocó tener que borrar mucho material de La Moncloa cuando cambiaron la licencia. En este caso, si las imágenes se han validado en un momento dado, ya da igual que cambien la licencia. Las imágenes se quedarían. Un saludo y gracias por tu labor
--Discasto talk 08:15, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- No hay ningun problema, de verdad me olvido de tu angtiguo mensaje. Me acuerdo cuando se borraron muchas fotos de la Presidencia y no quiero volver a verlo. Gracias a ti. Hasta luego. – Rachimbourg (talk) 10:11, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Perdona por mi tono en el mensaje anterior. Soy muy "sensible" con el tema de La Moncloa. En el pasado me tocó tener que borrar mucho material de La Moncloa cuando cambiaron la licencia. En este caso, si las imágenes se han validado en un momento dado, ya da igual que cambien la licencia. Las imágenes se quedarían. Un saludo y gracias por tu labor
![]() |
File:Pedro Sánchez recibe al presidente de la República del Ecuador Lenín Moreno 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Leoboudv (talk) 23:13, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:(Ana Brnabić) DLD Munich 18 - Day 3.jpg
[edit]
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Dialog-warning.svg/45px-Dialog-warning.svg.png)
![NC](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Cc-nc_white.svg/12px-Cc-nc_white.svg.png)
![ND](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Cc-nd_white.svg/12px-Cc-nd_white.svg.png)
![Copyright](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/Copyright.svg/12px-Copyright.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![SA](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/15px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
![CC0](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Cc-zero_white.svg/15px-Cc-zero_white.svg.png)
![PDM](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg/15px-Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg.png)
Y.haruo (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev oct 2017.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Zoran Zaev oct 2017.jpg
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Zoran Zaev oct 2017.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Overwriting files
[edit]Hi, please read and obey COM:OVERWRITE. Jcb (talk) 13:40, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Bonjour. J'ai respecté les règles : j'ai téléchargé chaque fois une nouvelle version de fichier pour les parlements fédérés belges, respectant le bon positionnement des partis sur l'axe parlementaire droite/gauche (ce que les fichiers ne faisaient pas convenablement) et les bonnes couleurs des partis politiques, tirées de leurs logos (ce que les fichiers précédents ne faisaient pas convenablement). Ce travail a été salué par un contributeur francophone du projet:Belgique sur WP:FR. Merci donc de rétablir les versions de ces visuels, ou de vous expliquer au-delà d'une règle qui n'a pas été violée. – Rachimbourg (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Please leave the discussion where it started. If you want to upload a visually different version of an image, you must do so with a new file name. Don't overwrite another file with it. Yes, you broke COM:OVERWRITE. Jcb (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Les fichiers concernés en étaient tous à leur deuxième version. Je n'ai fait qu'une mise à jour (le visuel représente la même chose mais avec des couleurs et un positionnement sur l'axe gauche/droite différents). Je ne vais pas créer un nouveau fichier pour poursuivre le même objectif. J'ai appliqué cette règle (corrections to diagrams, maps, or charts, if a more accurate version is available) de manière stricte. L'historique des versions antérieures permet de bien visualiser les différences apportées, de constater qu'il s'agit de corrections mineures visant à améliorer le diagramme. Merci donc de rétablir mes versions, totalement conformes aux règles de Wikimedia:Commons. – Rachimbourg (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Commons is not going to tell local Wikipedia versions which colors and positioning they have to use, that's why you must upload such a file under a new name. Jcb (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Donc ma modification n'est pas bonne, alors que celle qui l'a précédée (avec pour commentaire explicatif : « right-left spectrum position ») convient. Les règles s'appliquent différemment selon les personnes et les années visiblement. Je mets à jour avec les couleurs correspondant aux logos des partis concernés et selon le bon positionnement sur l'axe gauche/droite tel que consensuel entre les Wikipédias locaux, mais je viole une règle que d'autres n'ont pas été invités à faire respecter. C'est absolument grotesque. Rassurez-vous, je ne toucherai plus à ce fichier. J'ai autre chose à faire que justifier d'avoir correctement fait mon travail de contributeur et que de créer un deuxième fichier pour dire exactement la même chose. Commons atteint là le comble du ridicule. Au revoir. – Rachimbourg (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Pouvez-vous alors annuler le renommage du fichier. Il porte le même titre que les fichiers de sa catégorie mais ne leur ressemble pas. Si je dois vraiment télécharger ma version du diagramme dans un nouveau fichier, alors je souhaite qu'il se nomme Parlement de la Communauté française 2014, par souci de cohérence. Il en va de même pour Parlement Wallonie 2014.svg. Merci beaucoup. — Rachimbourg (talk) 09:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- No, we are not going to rename an existing file so that you can upload a new version with the old file name. Jcb (talk) 16:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Pouvez-vous alors annuler le renommage du fichier. Il porte le même titre que les fichiers de sa catégorie mais ne leur ressemble pas. Si je dois vraiment télécharger ma version du diagramme dans un nouveau fichier, alors je souhaite qu'il se nomme Parlement de la Communauté française 2014, par souci de cohérence. Il en va de même pour Parlement Wallonie 2014.svg. Merci beaucoup. — Rachimbourg (talk) 09:13, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Donc ma modification n'est pas bonne, alors que celle qui l'a précédée (avec pour commentaire explicatif : « right-left spectrum position ») convient. Les règles s'appliquent différemment selon les personnes et les années visiblement. Je mets à jour avec les couleurs correspondant aux logos des partis concernés et selon le bon positionnement sur l'axe gauche/droite tel que consensuel entre les Wikipédias locaux, mais je viole une règle que d'autres n'ont pas été invités à faire respecter. C'est absolument grotesque. Rassurez-vous, je ne toucherai plus à ce fichier. J'ai autre chose à faire que justifier d'avoir correctement fait mon travail de contributeur et que de créer un deuxième fichier pour dire exactement la même chose. Commons atteint là le comble du ridicule. Au revoir. – Rachimbourg (talk) 18:26, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Commons is not going to tell local Wikipedia versions which colors and positioning they have to use, that's why you must upload such a file under a new name. Jcb (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Les fichiers concernés en étaient tous à leur deuxième version. Je n'ai fait qu'une mise à jour (le visuel représente la même chose mais avec des couleurs et un positionnement sur l'axe gauche/droite différents). Je ne vais pas créer un nouveau fichier pour poursuivre le même objectif. J'ai appliqué cette règle (corrections to diagrams, maps, or charts, if a more accurate version is available) de manière stricte. L'historique des versions antérieures permet de bien visualiser les différences apportées, de constater qu'il s'agit de corrections mineures visant à améliorer le diagramme. Merci donc de rétablir mes versions, totalement conformes aux règles de Wikimedia:Commons. – Rachimbourg (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Please leave the discussion where it started. If you want to upload a visually different version of an image, you must do so with a new file name. Don't overwrite another file with it. Yes, you broke COM:OVERWRITE. Jcb (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Eh bien, vous êtes ce qu'on appelle quelqu'un de constructif, d'ouvert et de dialoguant... Je commence à mieux comprendre votre premier message... — Rachimbourg (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Hospital General de Villalba.jpg
[edit]
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Dialog-warning.svg/45px-Dialog-warning.svg.png)
![NC](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Cc-nc_white.svg/12px-Cc-nc_white.svg.png)
![ND](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Cc-nd_white.svg/12px-Cc-nd_white.svg.png)
![Copyright](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/Copyright.svg/12px-Copyright.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![SA](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/15px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
![CC0](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Cc-zero_white.svg/15px-Cc-zero_white.svg.png)
![PDM](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg/15px-Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg.png)
Elisfkc (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
File:2019-11-15 Inauguracyjna Rada Ministrów.jpg was recently deleted
[edit]I would like to let you know that File:2019-11-15 Inauguracyjna Rada Ministrów.jpg was recently deleted, if you disagree with the deletion you are requested to file an un-deletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests. Please do not make too many problematic un-deletion requests as this can lead to administrative actions.
Deleted by User:JuTa. Reason for deletion : No license since 13 May 2020 . Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
An unfree Flickr license was found on File:2020-10-06 Powołanie nowych członków Rady Ministrów.jpg
[edit]
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6e/Dialog-warning.svg/45px-Dialog-warning.svg.png)
![NC](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2f/Cc-nc_white.svg/12px-Cc-nc_white.svg.png)
![ND](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Cc-nd_white.svg/12px-Cc-nd_white.svg.png)
![Copyright](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/Copyright.svg/12px-Copyright.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![BY](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/11/Cc-by_new_white.svg/15px-Cc-by_new_white.svg.png)
![SA](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/Cc-sa_white.svg/15px-Cc-sa_white.svg.png)
![CC0](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Cc-zero_white.svg/15px-Cc-zero_white.svg.png)
![PDM](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg/15px-Cc-public_domain_mark_white.svg.png)
Túrelio (talk) 19:36, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Portuguese parliament seat diagrams with incorrect order
[edit]«Ordre correct»? Não, pá: o CDS ficou sempre à direita. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- C'est plus que discutable pour la période entre 1979 et 1991. Mais soit, je corrigerai plus tard. – Rachimbourg (talk) 17:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Não é discutível: O CDS ficou sempre sentado à direita, mesmo em 1978. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- OK, voy a corregir eso en los gráficos que hice (sorry, I'm not good in English and I don't speak Portuguese). – Rachimbourg (talk) 18:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pá, devias ter-te ficado pelo francês… :-\ -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 07:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- OK, voy a corregir eso en los gráficos que hice (sorry, I'm not good in English and I don't speak Portuguese). – Rachimbourg (talk) 18:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Não é discutível: O CDS ficou sempre sentado à direita, mesmo em 1978. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 11:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kabinet-Rutte IV.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: No permission, cc0 is not applicable for pictures.)
Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Encycloon.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 15:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:AR Eleicoes 2022.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : FellowMellow.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ángeles Amador PSMTV 2011.png
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ángeles Amador PSMTV 2011.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ángeles Amador PSMTV 2011.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
De728631 (talk) 14:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Logo 20 Congreso PP.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Logo 20 Congreso PP.png
![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Logo 20 Congreso PP.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:05, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Logo 19 Congreso PP.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|