User talk:Racconish/Archive1

This is an archive of past discussions for the period 2008-2014. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Racconish!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

File:Moxon Village Yew Tree Mills.JPG

If we are going to rename this, then we might as well name it something useful. There is a chimney in the middle of this view, is this a picture of the mill and surrounding village? Or just a picture from the mill? ... --Tony Wills (talk) 07:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

This is probably a view of the village of Holmbridge, Yorkshire. A weavers mill does not typically have such a chimney. Racconish 06:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Racconish!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Image:Paris waist from Charvet.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Image:Little dress Charvet.jpg was uncategorized on 29 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:56, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. Racconish (talk) 13:21, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 874c4cd8ec1a0d27cb7c667091e035dd

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

tea kettle raccoon

hi;

just a minor note, since your name suggests that you are a fan of raccoons; but the "tea-kettle raccoon" in the painting you uploaded is actually a tanuki (raccoon-dog) in the japanese folktale bunbuku chagama

(i changed the categories for the file, as appropriate)

hope you will upload more stuff! :)

Lx 121 (talk) 22:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Happy uploads, — Racconish^Tk 08:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Dufy_Les_Allies.jpg

File:Dufy_Les_Allies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Elektrischer Zweischeibenstreuer zs200m2 4.jpg

Hi Racconish. Did you intentionally reduce the resolution? --Leyo 15:47, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

… same at File:71 Verlorenes Paradies.JPG and File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F007416-0008, Bahnhof Bonn, Verabschiedung Apostolischer Nuntius.jpg. Hmm, maybe you could better use Cropbot? --:bdk: 16:00, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Done.Sorry about that. Thanks for advising kindly. Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 21:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. --Leyo 09:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

2012-11 allègement de description

Bonjour Racconish,

Aujourd'hui vous avez modifié les description de quatre images, supprimant notament les liens vers un compte twitter et vers un compte facebook. Prévoyez vous de faire de même avec les autres images de la Category:Images taken by Israel Defense Force ? Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

A mon avis, ce serait une bonne neutralisation. Mais il m'a semblé préférable d'attendre d'éventuelles réactions. Qu'en pesnez-vous ? Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 21:35, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Je ne sais pas, je connais peu les us et coutumes de Commons. Me conseillez vous d'attendre pour refaire un masquage, sans suppression, des comptes twitter et facebook dans les descriptions? De toute façon, c'est pas urgent. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 22:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

A mon sens les éléments que j'ai supprimés sont inutiles, non-neutres et non conformes à ce que devrait être une description d'image. En particulier le spam. Peut-être conviendrait-il de poser la question au bistro ? Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 22:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

C'est aussi mon avis.
Je ne sais pas, comme je vous l'ai dis je connais peu les us et coutumes de Commons.

Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 22:20, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, je vois que vous avez posé la question au bistrot entretemps. L'échange vous paraît-il concluant ? Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 17:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Non, je n'ai pas posé la question au bistrot (j'ai demandé pour le débit de modifications, et pour les importations depuis Flickr), et les échanges ne me semblent pas concluants. Mais PierreSelim a abordé la question des descriptions, et je vais engager la conversation avec lui (et les autres qui seront intéressés). Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Oui, j'ai noté moi aussi son commentaire sur la neutralisation qu'il me semble opportun de discuter. Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 09:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Cette section du bistro a été archivée. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 21:45, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Je ne pense pas que ce soit un problème de désarchiver la section pour la compléter. Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 07:32, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Puisque la section avait pour objet initial un autre sujet, il me semble préférable, si on veut remlettre le sujet sur la table de créer une nouvelle section, dédié spécifiquement à la question des modifications de descriptions dans la Category:Images taken by Israel Defense Force. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

N'hésitez pas

! Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 07:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Fait. Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 22:03, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Victory rooster.jpg

File:Victory rooster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PierreSelim (talk) 09:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Dufy Les Allies.jpg

File:Dufy Les Allies.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PierreSelim (talk) 09:32, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Filemover

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Racconish, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Érico Wouters ^msg 21:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

File:LG20120911-216.jpg

File:LG20120911-216.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 17:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I had not paid attention to the exif, but I agree with you. Thanks for advising, I will remove it from the French WP. Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 17:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Oops, sorry. This notification should not have gone to your talkpage, but to the original uploader's. --Túrelio (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Nothing to aopogize about, it was useful. Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 19:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Caricature Joseph Reinach.jpg

Hi Racconish, any more information about the artist than just "Lux"? --Túrelio (talk) 06:04, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Found his first name on the French WP article on La libre parole illustrée. Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 06:53, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Films

Hi. Could you explain (or if there is discussion elsewhere give me a link) edits like this removing "film" categories in favor of "video"? (Seems contrary to use on en:W, and I'd think noting whatever the original medium was would be of some relevance.) Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Infrogmation, taking this example, I found there were ogv files in both Category:1905 films and Category:Videos of 1905. I thought the best would be (a) to put Category:Videos of 1905 in Category:1905 films and (b) to keep all non ogv files in Category:1905 films and put only ogv files in Category:Videos of 1905, leaving other documents such as photograms, fragments or posters in Category:1905 films, to group files in a coherent manner. I hope this makes sense. Doing the same for Category:Silent films and Category:Silent films videos. Started with 1881, not finished yet. Please let me know what you think. Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 20:36, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:The Cheese Mites or Lilliputians in a London Restaurant (1901).ogv

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 23:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Artistic Creation (1901).ogv

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 23:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Stefan, I have answered at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Robert W. Paul. Thanks, — Racconish^Tk 13:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:A Gentleman of Quality.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:A Gentleman of Quality.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:50, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Done Thanks, — Racconish^Tk 17:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Romance and Arabella.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Romance and Arabella.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Done Thanks, — Racconish^Tk 17:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

thanks --Jarekt (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Poiana vase.jpg

File:Poiana vase.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:46, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Done. Thanks, — Racconish^Tk 08:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:The Shielding Shadow.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:The Shielding Shadow.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Done. Thanks, — Racconish^Tk 14:07, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks--Jarekt (talk) 16:12, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Bistro

Salut,

Je m’excuse pour le ton de mes réponses, je dois vraiment passer pour le sysop Commons connard de service qui te prend de haut avec les questions de droit d’auteur ^_^".

J’avoue être très agacé par cette histoire, d’autant que je n’ai pas vraiment le temps de régler ça (mon train de vacances part dans tout juste 2h…).

Bref, désolé pour pas être très sympa avec toi alors que tu ne penses pas à mal.

Cdlt, Jean-Fred (talk) 10:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Tu es tout excusé et je te remercie d'avoir pris le soin de me laisser ce gentil message. Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 10:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:The Power of Evil.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:The Power of Evil.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:The Three Godfathers 2.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it. If you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Done Thanks, — Racconish^Tk 17:24, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:The Iron Claw 4.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:The Iron Claw 4.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:53, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Done. Thanks, — Racconish^Tk 16:05, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Charvet

Charvet Place Vendôme first floor 01 =>Précision : il s’agit du rez-de-chaussée. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 19:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Oui; le rez de chaussée se dit first floor en anglais américain. Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 19:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:25, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks,— Racconish^Tk 08:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Etienne Ignace Desbiez (1709-1780), Avocat-général au Parlement de Besançon.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Etienne Ignace Desbiez (1709-1780), Avocat-général au Parlement de Besançon.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I am not the original uploader, but I will contact him to help him if necessary. Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 09:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Claude Alexandre Desbiez baron de saint Juan (1747-1820).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Claude Alexandre Desbiez baron de saint Juan (1747-1820).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I am not the original uploader, but I will contact him to help him if necessary. Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 09:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Alexandre Desbiez baron de Saint Juan (1820-1873).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Alexandre Desbiez baron de Saint Juan (1820-1873).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I am not the original uploader, but I will contact him to help him if necessary. Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 09:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Charles Desbiez baron de Saint Juan (1785-1872).jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Charles Desbiez baron de Saint Juan (1785-1872).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I am not the original uploader, but I will contact him to help him if necessary. Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 09:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Fichiers Desbiez de Saint Juan et Jouffroy d'Abbans

Hello Racconish, Merci beaucoup pour ton aide sur les fichiers, mais je ne m'en suis rendu compte qu'après et je crois que j'ai tout fichu en l'air... Peux-tu avoir la gentilesse de repasser voir le massacre éventuel avant qu'ils ne soient supprimés pour défaut d'info. En fait je voulais mettre "Collection particulière" et pour la licence, je ne sais pas laquelle mettre pour laisser la plus grande utilisation possible. Je maîtrise mieux le droit nobiliaire sous l'ancien régime que le droit des nouveaux media.(Ps: as-tu lu la PDD famille de Rohan-Chabot? Ça me rappelle le film " Un jour sans fin". Merci à toi --Montbarrey (talk) 06:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

J'ai contacté Magog the Ogre. Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 10:08, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

In this case, it seems the best answer is to provide the source as {{Private collection}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Also, if the original prints have fallen out of copyright, then you should probably mark the image as {{Licensed-PD-Art}} (I will gladly do so if you indicate how they fell out of copyright). However, we could leave the license as is if Montbarrey is uploading the images with permission from the original copyright holder, so that the license applies worldwide (see Commons:Hirtle Chart). I realize this is a very complicated answer to a simple question, but copyright is itself quite complicated, especially when dealing with different laws and traditions per country.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Montbarrey, peux-tu expliquer sur quoi tu te fondes pour affirmer que ces images sont entrées dans le domaine public ? Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 16:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your help Magog the Ogre. I have followed up with a discussion with Montbarrey (in French) here. He says the paintings are in a private collection in France, he photographed them himself and the painted portraits are considered to be contemporary of their subjects (before 1781 for File:Etienne Ignace Desbiez (1709-1780), Avocat-général au Parlement de Besançon.jpg, before 1821 for File:Claude Alexandre Desbiez baron de saint Juan (1747-1820).jpg, before ~~1874~~ 1864 for File:Alexandre Desbiez baron de Saint Juan (1820-1873).jpg and before ~~1873~~ 1863 for File:Charles Desbiez baron de Saint Juan (1785-1872).jpg) (actually, says Montbarrey, the date of 1835 inonthe painting). Hence {{Private collection}} and {{Licensed-PD-Art}} would be appropriate. Does this address all your concerns ? Cheers, — Racconish^Tk 06:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes. I will mark it with licensed PD-art; this isn't important for Commons as much as it's important for reusers of the content in places like France which don't have PD-art protections. I hope it wasn't too much of a hassle, but a description like this one isn't very helpful for figuring out the proper source and verifying the license (e.g., not all paintings that look old are in fact old). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:31, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. Thanks for your help. Happy editing, — Racconish^Tk 19:23, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Portraits Desbiez de Saint-Juan

Help Racconish,

Je me rends compte que :

La date de décès de Charles Desbiez de Saint-Juan est 1862 et pas 1872 comme indiqué dans le nom du fichier.
La date de décès d'Alexandre Desbiez de Saint-Juan est 1863 et pas 1873 comme indiqué dans le nom du fichier.

Je ne sais pas comment modifier les noms de ces deux fichiers qui contiennent une date fausse (ça me prend la tête): c'est possible ou il faut les supprimer et les importer à nouveau?

Sinon : le portrait de Charles Desbiez de Saint-Juan date de 1835 (c'est écrit dessus en bas à droite avec une signature illisible)

Merci de ton aide. --Montbarrey (talk) 10:30, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Noms corrigés. Cordialement,— Racconish^Tk 14:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Merci, mais ça marche pas... les dates de décès en dessous des portraits sur la page "Famille Desbiez de Saint-Juan" n'ont pas changé... Ton avis sur le pb? Cordialement --Montbarrey (talk) 21:26, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Réglé. Tu pouvais le faire toi-même. Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 07:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, --Montbarrey (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Bienvenu, comme on dit au Canada. Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 18:57, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Studio Jean Jacques Lequeu.jpg

File:Studio Jean Jacques Lequeu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lemajanjan (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Frank Samson.JPG

You should have received an email from Frank Samson stating he is okay with the rights of this picture. How can we solve this problem together? --Capripot (talk) 15:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Envoyé à OTRS ? Si oui, utiliser le modèle {{OTRS pending}}. Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 16:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Le mail a été envoyé le 12 mars 2014 à permissions-commons-fr permissions-commons-fr@wikimedia.org avec le texte suivant :

Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif des droits d'auteur attachés à l'œuvre publiée à l'adresse https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Frank_Samson.JPG. Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence cc-by-sa-2.0-fr Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre, y compris dans un but commercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence. Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées. Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc. Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia.

Frank SAMSON & Ronan POTAGE (web)

J'espère que tout est dans les bonnes cases dorénavant.

{{OTRS pending}} apposé. Cordialement, — Racconish^Tk 14:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Man and woman dancing a waltz (1887)

Hi there. Thanks for slowing down the single dancer and removing the watermarks. Unfortunately for the dancing couple something seems to have gone wrong: the movement isn't fluent any more. Maybe because the order of the individual images has been changed? Like number 11 right next to number 1 and before 2? Feel free to try again, thought. And if you have the time, tell me how you did it. --Judithcomm (talk) 21:09, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Judith ! I fixed it with photoshop. Will check asap. Cheers, — Racconish^✉ 21:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

File:The Phantom of the Opera (1925).webm

Bonjour Racconish, est ce qu'il y a une raison particulière au fait que The Phantom of the Opera (1925).webm n'ait pas de son. Sur youtube que tu cites en source, il y a bien le son. C'est un problème de mon coté ou bien il y a une autre raison ? Pamputt (talk) 20:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, c'est un film muet à l'origine, dont seule la version muette est certainement tombée dans le domaine public. N'étant pas certain que la bande son de la copie de YouTube soit elle aussi dans le domaine public (le problème est compliqué, voir [1]), j'ai préféré l'enlever de la version que j'ai téléversée. Merci pour le sous-titrage ! Cordialement, — Racconish^✉ 20:41, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Ah d'accord, merci pour l'explication. Ça semble en effet très compliqué ... Dommage Pamputt (talk) 21:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

File:الابتسامه جميله جدا 2014-04-01 08-34.jpg

File:الابتسامه جميله جدا 2014-04-01 08-34.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gunnex (talk) 08:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Beat the Devil (1953).webm

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Beat the Devil (1953).webm, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

LutzBruno (talk) 10:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Done. Thanks, — Racconish^✉ 12:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

isn't really the right word, as I'm dumbfounded and saddened by the encounter you had with Asav at no-wiki. As far as I'm concerned, the reaction was stunningly blunt and I second what Bjørn som tegner expressed at Asav's talkpage. Sadly his comment was removed, accompanied by the remark "removing inappropriate message". Alas, this kind of behaviour seems to be normal for a couple of users at no-wiki I'm afraid, and one of them found you :(. BR Noorse (talk) 01:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks @Noorse: very appreciated ! Cheers, — Racconish^✉ 06:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Rattles from Pompeii.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rattles from Pompeii.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 18:28, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Done — Racconish^✉ 07:58, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Betty Boop's Bamboo Isle (1932).webm

File:Betty Boop's Bamboo Isle (1932).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84user (talk) 01:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Minnie the Moocher (1932).webm

File:Minnie the Moocher (1932).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84user (talk) 01:49, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright renewal check

Hi Racconish, how did you check the copyright renewal status for the Betty Boop videos you uploaded? I've nominated two for deletion because there had been renewals in 1959. Note that the license tag you used claims "the copyright was not renewed" but the records show otherwise. Please see the link I left in the Minnie the Moocher nomination to see how to check for renewals, as they can be difficult to find. -84user (talk) 01:58, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

I replied there. Thanks, — Racconish^✉ 09:52, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Virginia Woolf 1927.jpg

File:Virginia Woolf 1927.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Rosenzweig τ 16:37, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Régence d'Alger

Salut,

En voilà déjà une. Les deux autres sont trop grandes, l'ordinateur ne veut pas les sauvegarder. Je vais me renseigner. Pyb (talk) 12:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Grand merci ! J'ai un message d'erreur quand j'essaie d'afficher au format d'origine. Cordialement,

Karsh

Bonjour Racconish,

Il va probablement y avoir un problème avec les photos de Yousuf Karsh que vous avez téléversées récemment. Le problème avec les photos de Karsh dont les sujets sont des personnalités des États-Unis ou internationales, c'est souvent que leur publication d'origine s'est faite aux États-Unis. Karsh faisait publier ces photos dans des magazines des É.-U., ce qui se comprend puisque les É.-U. en étaient le marché-cible principal. Par conséquent, on ne peut pas leur accoler le modèle PD-Canada. L'erreur était assez préoccupante pour qu'à un certain moment un utilisateur ajoute un avertissement spécial directement dans le modèle PD-Canada pour dire que ce modèle ne doit généralement pas être utilisé pour les photos de Karsh [2]. L'avertissement s'y trouve d'ailleurs encore, bien qu'actuellement il ne soit pas visible involontairement à cause de modifications de nature technique au modèle [3] (ce qui n'est pas nécessairement plus mal, car c'est peut-être un peu exagéré de mentionner le cas particulier de Karsh directement dans ce modèle). Il est aussi mentionné dans le modèle Possibly non-free in US de la Wikipédia en anglais. Plusieurs photos de Karsh ont déjà été téléversées et supprimées. Un exemple est la photo d'Einstein, qui en est au moins à sa quatrième suppression, peut-être plus (voir par exemple cette discussion de suppression de cette photo, la retéléverser serait probablement vu comme abusif). Les ayants droit de Yousuf Karsh ont exprimé qu'ils tiennent à la protection de leurs droits d'auteur, ce qui est compréhensible.

Ce que je crois comprendre de la situation actuelle sur Commons est qu'après de nombreuses discussions de suppression, il semble qu'elle pourrait se résumer à peu près comme suit. En général, les photos de Karsh sont présumées protégées par droits d'auteur aux États-Unis et donc non admissibles sur Commons. Mais il existe deux types d'exceptions, où on peut démontrer, ou présumer raisonnablement, que des photos sont dans le domaine public aux États-Unis :

Premier type d'exception : les photos dont on peut démontrer qu'elles ont été publiées à l'origine au Canada plus de 30 jours avant d'être publiées aux États-Unis, ou qu'on peut raisonnablement présumer l'avoir été, étant donné leur sujet, et qui ont été crées avant 1946 et publiées avant 1989. Exemple : File:VerePonsonby.jpg.
Deuxième type d'exception : les photos dont on peut démontrer qu'elles ont été publiées à l'origine aux États-Unis (et dont on peut raisonnablement présumer qu'elles n'ont pas été publiées dans un autre pays de 30 jours auparavant) dans une publication dont le copyright du contenu aurait nécessité un renouvellement, mais n'a pas été renouvelé par l'ayant droit sur la publication, et qu'on n'a pas trouvé de renouvellement sur cette publication de la photo par l'ayant droit sur la photo. Exemple : File:Hemingway portrait.jpg. (J'étais intervenu pour la conservation de ce fichier notamment sur la base que le proposant de la suppression n'avait fourni aucune référence convaincante ni aucun raisonnement qui aurait démontré la subsistance des droits d'auteur, mais, entre vous et moi, je ne suis pas certain de la conclusion et j'aurais préféré que des utilisateurs qui s'y connaissent bien en droits d'auteur des États-Unis interviennent.) D'un autre côté, d'autres photos qui semblent entrer dans cette catégorie d'exceptions ont été supprimées, puis restaurées, puis resupprimées (voir là).

Évidemment, dans ces cas, si l'ayant droit sur la photo nous fait part d'une référence ou d'un raisonnement démontrant la subsistance des droits d'auteur, il faudrait supprimer le fichier. Peuvent aussi être conservées les photos qui ont fait l'objet d'une licence libre par les ayants droit de Karsh. Apparemment, il y en aurait déjà eu deux sur Commons avec des références à un ticket OTRS. Actuellement, une recherche en montre une. (Je n'ai pas accès à OTRS, mais, pour le bénéfice des autres utilisateurs dans le même cas, j'avais ajouté en page de discussion du fichier un lien vers une discussion permettant de penser que ce fichier est en effet légitime.)

Malheureusement, la plupart des photos récemment téléversées ne semblent pas correspondre aux types d'exceptions mais plutôt à la règle générale des photos de Karsh qui ne sont pas acceptées par Commons. Par cohérence avec les décisions de suppression antérieures, elles devraient probablement être supprimées. Si vous en venez à cette même conclusion, il serait probablement préférable de faire la suppression dès que possible. De toutes façons, je serais intéressé à savoir ce que vous en pensez. Cordialement, -- Asclepias (talk) 23:25, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

@Asclepias: Je comprends le problème. J'ai tout proposé à la suppression. Cordialement, — Racconish^📥 09:57, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello Racconish/Archive1, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Frank Lloyd Wright by karsh.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:06, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: Thanks. In case you did not notice I had acknowledged my bad and nominated myself these files for deletion. I was actually not aware of a prior consensus on the extent of the Canadian notion of PD. Cheers, — Racconish^📥 07:02, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Racconish/Archive1

Tip: Categorizing images

TUSC token 874c4cd8ec1a0d27cb7c667091e035dd

tea kettle raccoon

2012-11 allègement de description

Filemover

Films

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Copyright status: File:A Gentleman of Quality.jpg

Copyright status: File:Romance and Arabella.jpg

Copyright status: File:The Shielding Shadow.jpg

Bistro

Copyright status: File:The Power of Evil.jpg

Copyright status: File:The Iron Claw 4.jpg

Charvet

Editor @ ar.wiki

File source is not properly indicated: File:Etienne Ignace Desbiez (1709-1780), Avocat-général au Parlement de Besançon.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Claude Alexandre Desbiez baron de saint Juan (1747-1820).jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Alexandre Desbiez baron de Saint Juan (1820-1873).jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Charles Desbiez baron de Saint Juan (1785-1872).jpg

Fichiers Desbiez de Saint Juan et Jouffroy d'Abbans

Portraits Desbiez de Saint-Juan

File tagging File:Frank Samson.JPG

Man and woman dancing a waltz (1887)

File:The Phantom of the Opera (1925).webm

File source is not properly indicated: File:Beat the Devil (1953).webm

Sorry

Copyright status: File:Rattles from Pompeii.jpg

Copyright renewal check

Régence d'Alger

Karsh

Deleted content

Navigation menu

Search