User talk:Qoan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive

Archivos


Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inoxcrom Wall Street. Nib. M.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gilbert & Blanzy-Poure — № 2770 LA BABILLARDE CEMENTÉE - Dozen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 20:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sergent Major-Montgolfier-J.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --S.Hinakawa 20:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sierra de la Villa. Villena. Castillo de la Atalaya 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Too bright overall, sharpness soso (you should sharpen it a bit), perspective correction needed (buildings on the left not straight) --Poco a poco 15:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I straightened slightly the left side, sharpened a bit and corrected darkness.Qoan 18:04, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better --Poco a poco 09:06, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ħal Luqa. Knisja 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
perspective --Charlesjsharp 19:04, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Partially ✓ Done. Thanks for reviewing. I had already accounted for lens distortion, but this new version is as much as I can correct perspective without losing the vanes (and creating a bizarre crop). --Qoan 19:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Depends what you use to correct the perspective. In Darktable, you lose very little of the top, if anything. I've taken the liberty of uploading a corrected version, but feel free to revert if you're not happy with it. I would  Support. Rodhullandemu 20:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, @Rodhullandemu: . I was using Raw Therapee, but it appears that Darktable behaves better for persp correction. I wouldn't revert, but I edited a new version just leaving some of the sky that had been lost along the way. Please revert if you think that it isn't an improvement. --Qoan 22:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's even better now. Rodhullandemu 23:11, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albaida. Palau. Interior. Cambres comtals. Pintures. Escut d'Albaida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted --Poco a poco 21:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review. I was struggling because the painting is slightly asymmetrical, I've ✓ Done a few corrections and I think it is and feels straighter now. --Qoan 12:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dimos Athineon.png

[edit]

Hello!, why does not comply with renaming guidelines?--WIJIDE (talk) 04:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Πεδίον Άρεως. Δημήτρης Υψηλάντς.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 20:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]