User talk:PrehistoryByLiam
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
I saw your reconstruction of Zygophyseter and it looks really professionally done, but it seems more reminiscent of a beaked whale than a sperm whale. Try moving the dorsal fin back a little, shrinking the dorsal fin, and adding ridges along the tail like in the modern sperm whale. Good work Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 03:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- By the way, there’s a bit of a review process for uploading reconstructions of extinct animals just to make sure they’re accurate. We’re talking about your art here Dunkleosteus77 (talk) 13:25, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Dunkleosteus77: Thank you! Forgive any errors/missteps in the process of communicating/uploading on here, I just started and it'll take some getting used to. I primarily referenced a reconstruction in the original description by Bianucci and Landini, which (along with most reconstructions) shows similar proportions as I have depicted. Both the basal position of Zygophyseter as well as its comparatively small size suggest it would not have had a wholly similar external appearance to Physeter, the modern sperm whale. Especially with regard to the tail ridges, which are soft tissue features known only in Physeter.