User talk:Pollycat
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 16:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
QIC review
[edit]Hey Pollycat, I don't know if this was just a simple mistake, but overwriting other people's reviews on QIC is not appropriate. If you disagree with an existing review please set the status to Discuss (rather than Nominate, Promote or Decline), and add your opinion after the existing comment. --Dschwen (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Dschwen appologies, I didnt realise I had done this, this was a mistake and am aware this should not be done I blame computer error ;) .--Pollycat (talk) 17:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you. for abuse of multiple accounts.
|
. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:57, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- Pollycat, I have unblocked your account. The block happened because your behavior made it appear that you and Danesman1 might be the same person, and since, as I understand it, you edit using his computer, the Checkuser check showed that you were in fact the same. That would be sockpuppetry, which we forbid.
- It is certainly permissible for friends to make comments on the same image, DR, or other vote, but when they do, it is a good idea for the later of the comments to have a note along the lines of "(full disclosure: I am a close friend of Danesman)". Without such notice, it is meatpuppetry -- two humans acting in concert -- which is also against the rules. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)