User talk:Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff/Archive 5

Block evasion

Please stop. By evading the existing three-month block of your account, as you have done using 72.11.218.137 and 85.18.242.26, you demonstrate that you have no intention to respect the Commons community and that you intend to continue to disrupt its work and harass its participants. Please use the duration of this block more constructively, such as by reading Commons:Licensing and our other policies and guidelines. If you continue to evade the block, I will change the limited duration of the block to indefinite, as I can see no reason why we should expect your behaviour to change, even after three months of enforced time off. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:54, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

• Very interesting situation. Who here wishes to make profit? Who is owner? Were is own server? --Gilderg 14:02, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• Are you the anti-semite? You do not like the Jewish surnames. [1]
• What basis one of firms (ICQ) using data "Wiki" for reception of financial profit has?

You're now blocked indefinitely for the reasons explained above. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

* Who "facked", you? The next personal attack on Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff?[2] You will not make anything to him but will suffer from your actions! What kind of your's personal financial interest in 'Wiki'? Why you breaking the rights of authors? Are you the anti-semits or russophobes too? That you so strongly are afraid blocking objectionable to you of courageous freethinking and truthful users, instead of slaves? Here are present not only as you - are available more cleverly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.11.219.220 (talk • contribs) at 16:45, 18 Oct 2007 (UTC)

You will order and lay down the conditions to the dogs and slaves, but not to users (including to the ingenius user Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff). Watch, yes? Watch, how dogs-police dogs? Ghost 16:53, 18 October 2007 (UTC) —The preceding fake signed comment was added by 72.11.219.220 (talk • contribs)

• Correctness of the user Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff has once again proved to be true! There[3] one more acknowledgement of unscrupulous using of work of users for reception of personal financial benefit. Such disgrace to leave it is impossible! RadioTVshowman 18 October 2007 (UTC) —the preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.11.219.52 (talk • contribs)

Blocked indefinitely

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for abuse of editing privileges.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Why does this involve blanking of his protected userpage? +sj + 03:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

I don't know that there is a standard practice, but three of us didn't think that it was useful to retain the content of that page.[4] In this instance, the user treated Commons as a personal web host, was disinterested in its goals and policies, and was abusive. The page content is still available via the edit history. Since this user has a history of copyright violations, it seems prudent to remove the userpage content. Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:23, 9 October 2009 (UTC)