User talk:PoetishBookwormus
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:34, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:El Coyote Cafe, Los Angeles Sharon Tate Stencil Art.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:El Coyote Cafe, Los Angeles Sharon Tate Stencil Art.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Adeletron 3030, thank you for the notification. My mistake. Of course the stencil art in this case would be considered a derivative work. I appreciate you catching that. I'm inquiring with the artist as to whether or not they will grant copyright permission. PoetishBookwormus (talk) 16:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
@Adeletron 3030, I added the stencil artist’s attribution in the description of the file. Now just waiting to see if he will give copyright permission. PoetishBookwormus (talk) 17:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ben Proudfoot with Camera.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ben Proudfoot with Camera.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ben Proudfoot with Camera.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Adeletron 3030, thank you for the message. I do, indeed, have written permission from the copyright holder for the image File:Ben Proudfoot with Camera.jpg. I will follow the instructions above and ask the copyright holder to send written permission to the email address you indicated. Thanks again! PoetishBookwormus (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Granada Theater South Bend Knute Rockne Premiere.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Granada Theater South Bend Knute Rockne Premiere.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
And also:
- File:Granada Theater, South Bend, Interior.jpg
- File:Avon Theater South Bend 3.jpg
- File:Avon Theater South Bend.jpg
- File:Avon Theatre South Bend.jpg
Yours sincerely, Vera (talk) 20:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Spirit Mural in Detroit Michigan by Muralist Waleed Johnson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for flagging the concern. This particular photo was uploaded with the written approval of the muralist and should not be deleted. Please just advise me on where to send this approval to settle the dispute. PoetishBookwormus (talk) 05:43, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Poe Returning to Boston Statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |