User talk:Poco a poco/2023-03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The file you uploaded, is on the main page!

The file File:Duna Elim, Sossusvlei, Namibia, 2018-08-06, DD 165-162 PAN.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galería Uffizi, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galería Uffizi, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral, Perugia, Italia, 2022-09-20, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:40, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 00:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Puente de las Legiones, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-01, DD 11-13 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puente de las Legiones, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-01, DD 11-13 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Iglesia de San Francisco de Asís, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-03, DD 02-04 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Francisco de Asís, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-03, DD 02-04 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:38, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:52, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 10:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:31, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:04, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 23:04, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 20:27, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:03, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Logia de la Señora, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vecchio sobre el río Arno, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presa de San Niccolò, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de Víctor Manuel II y castillo Sant'Angelo, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de Víctor Manuel II, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de Víctor Manuel II, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vecchio sobre el río Arno, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs a perspective tweak? Leaning in on the sides. --Mike Peel 13:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
True, sorry for that, ✓ fixed --Poco a poco 18:19, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vecchio sobre el río Arno, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Clouds look overexposed, and background building is tilted - fixable? or crop? --Mike Peel 11:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Ok, fair, I reduced the highlights and applied a crop, good to go? --Poco a poco 18:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Torre de agua de Šítkov, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-01, DD 02-04 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Torre de agua de Šítkov, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-01, DD 02-04 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora ante Týn, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-02, DD 259-261 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de Nuestra Señora ante Týn, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-02, DD 259-261 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Presa de San Niccolò, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:42, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuente Mayor, Perugia, Italia, 2022-09-20, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Sant'Angelo, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Sant'Angelo, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Foro Romano, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 99.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza de la República, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Mayor, Arezzo, Italia, 2022-09-17, DD 89-91 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There's CA on the roof lights both in left and right side. Can you fix it? --Fabian Roudra Baroi 20:53, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Yes, sure, gone, but I considered it pretty slight CA given the file size. --Poco a poco 21:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 16:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Cestio, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de la Santa Cruz, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente de Víctor Manuel II, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 17:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vecchio sobre el río Arno, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 230-232 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The light reflections on the water looks over processed or posterized. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:12, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ New version --Poco a poco 18:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support I like it. -- 02:35, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

FYI

Hallo Diego, ein paar deiner Uploads sind hier aufgefallen. Nur zur Info, damit du dich nicht wunderst, wenn da Umbenennungen stattfinden. Gruß, Achim55 (talk) 13:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Hallo Achim55, interessant, ich kann mir nicht erklären wo diese Zeichen herkommen, aber ich hatte tatsächlich das Problem schon vor ein paar Jahren. Ich habe 2 selbst umbenannt, weil davon auch FP Kandidaturen abhingen. Beim Rest sollte eine Umbenennung nichts kaputtmachen. Danke dir fürs Aufspüren und Bescheid sagen! --Poco a poco (talk) 13:12, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 142-144 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The other one has a more accurate perspective and a more harmonic composition, but I can't stand the lights between the fences there. This one is more quiet although it has this nice appearing x ray vision ghost guy on the right side of the street. --Der Angemeldete 23:45, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 157-159 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia parroquial, Arezzo, Italia, 2022-09-17, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza del 4 de Noviembre, Perugia, Italia, 2022-09-20, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cr7Carlos 23:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jardín de Bóboli, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-19, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I don't think this is the optimal angle to take a photo of this subject. From this angle, I would choose a pic to includes only the upper part. Also the subject is too small compared to the background, maybe a cropped pic will do better. --Mister rf 14:52, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
IMHO this is a matter of taste. I believe that the photographer can decide in cases like this whether it would place the camera there where the statue is starring. --Poco a poco 18:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality IMO. - Espandero 10:04, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Alfombra de algas amarillas, parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 42.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alfombra de algas amarillas, parque nacional Ras Muhammad, Egipto, 2022-03-27, DD 42.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parlamento Federal, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Real, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cr7Carlos 17:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parlamento Europeo, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 112.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 163-165 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Batería de Cenizas, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-14, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Batería de Cenizas, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-14, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de Santa María de Gracia, Cartagena, España, 2022-07-16, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 139-141 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 10:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 160-162 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 10:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 151-153 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Real, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-14, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:46, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Real, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Slight tilt cw. --Der Angemeldete 12:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Cr7Carlos 17:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Slight tilt ✓ applied Poco a poco 23:08, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 145-147 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 148-150 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
✓ Gone, thank you! --Poco a poco 23:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 08:44, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Pitti, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 194-196 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- 05:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Giuseppe Mazzini, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:08, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vecchio sobre el río Arno, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 233-235 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 10:44, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Muñeco de nieve, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-29, DD 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukas Beck (talk) 11:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Banco Mora, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-29, DD 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukas Beck (talk) 11:02, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 11:04, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de Halle, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:08, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:31, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio del Municipio, Arezzo, Italia, 2022-09-17, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Altiero Spinelli, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 19:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de Halle, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. -- 09:39, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro Real del Parque, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:07, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arco del Cincuentenario, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 136-138 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 178-180 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio de Justicia, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 68-70 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaza Mayor, Arezzo, Italia, 2022-09-17, DD 95-97 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:09, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de Halle, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 76-78 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 181-183 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Saint-Gilles, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 97-99 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificios en la Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 12:09, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo BELvue, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-14, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
✓ Done, thank you --Poco a poco 18:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 19:27, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parlamento Europeo, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It looks noisy (both random and colour) when zoomed in, fixable? --Mike Peel 20:53, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done, thank you --Poco a poco 18:33, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. Much better now, thanks. --Mike Peel 20:10, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puente Sant'Angelo, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slightly leaning out on the right. --MB-one 14:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done, thank you --Poco a poco 18:37, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:13, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atomium, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 154-156 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo BELvue, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manneken Pis, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-14, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Iglesia de Saint-Gilles, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 103-105 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de Saint-Gilles, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 103-105 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palacio Real, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-14, DD 25-33 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica del Sagrado Corazón, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 172-174 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica del Sagrado Corazón, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 169-171 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:57, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de Halle, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 73-75 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Magnifique, FP for me. --Tournasol7 15:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo BELvue, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little bit blurry on the left side but still ok in my view --Imehling 08:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:54, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 31-33 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica del Sagrado Corazón, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 166-168 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
✓ Done --Poco a poco 09:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 07:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-14, DD 16-18 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Strong color noise with some dead pixels and a few dust spots should be removed. --Ermell 20:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ New version, thank you --Poco a poco 22:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a la Infantería Belga, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality, but does it need to have so much whitespace at the top? Perhaps it could also be a bit more central? --Mike Peel 21:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done --Poco a poco 22:51, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 10:18, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio Berlaymont, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de la Puerta de Halle, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 87.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 23:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estatua de Godofredo de Bouillón e iglesia de Santiago, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:17, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 25-27 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The verticals can still be improved --Ermell 10:52, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ Done --Poco a poco 21:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:31, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Saint-Gilles, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 94-96 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:12, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 49-51 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Saint-Gilles, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 100-102 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:14, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museo de la Puerta de Halle, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 72.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificios en la Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Modern primat 13:26, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 190-192 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Disturbing luminance and chromatic noise in the shadow areas, fixable? --F. Riedelio 16:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
✓ New version --Poco a poco 21:20, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:57, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mont des Arts, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-14, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 23:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificios en la Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 184-186 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 10-11 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 19:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 19:25, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galeries royales Saint-Hubert, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-14, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica del Sagrado Corazón, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 175-177 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Saco y la Carretilla, Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Saint-Gilles, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 103-105 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parlamento Europeo, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de Sablon, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 65.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monumento a la Infantería Belga y Palacio de Justicia, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-14, DD 10-12 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de San Miguel y Santa Gúdula de Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 43-45 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catedral de San Florián, Vaduz, Liechtenstein, 2022-10-23, DD 38-40 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de San Florián, Vaduz, Liechtenstein, 2022-10-23, DD 38-40 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Saco y la Carretilla, Grand-Place, Bruselas, Bélgica, 2021-12-15, DD 187-189 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antigua Amatunte, Chipre, 2021-12-14, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antigua Amatunte, Chipre, 2021-12-14, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)