User talk:Poco a poco/2017-11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Kórnik, Kórnik, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quinta Avenida, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Kórnik, Kórnik, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 08:27, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teatro, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Montreal desde el Monte Royal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 93-107 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Comercios en la calle Front, Dawson City, Yukón, Canadá, 2017-08-27, DD 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baños de Tajo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-25, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bayubas de Arriba, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:51, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alocén, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación de Windsor, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:06, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:59, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Casa Pashkov, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 36-37 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Casa Pashkov, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 36-37 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beluga Point, Anchorage, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-22, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle histórica Creek, Ketchikan, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-16, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:50, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Calle histórica Creek, Ketchikan, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-16, DD 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kremlin y río Moscova, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 20-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent, possible FP, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 12:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upper Trade Rows, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 12-13 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:07, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centro histórico de Skagway, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-18, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and interesting, but could you give a more specific description in your file description? We're looking at a diorama? -- Ikan Kekek 12:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Dog Saloon, Juneau, Alaska, Estados Unidos, 2017-08-17, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Such a red room! -- Ikan Kekek 12:29, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Goluchow, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antiguo edificio del Seattle Times, Seattle, Washington, Estados Unidos, 2017-09-02, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good enough for a QI but please remove the CAs first. --Basotxerri 13:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 19:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orillares, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 61.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tajueco, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fresno de Caracena, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Natividad, Vadillo, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traíd, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cidones, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tordelrábano, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Zoma, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 88.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mochales, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-07, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espeja de San Marcelino, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catedral de San Basilio, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 05-06 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de San Basilio, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 05-06 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

An actual explanation would be helpful, you know reasoning and so on... uncommented revert and just a "too much" and "you cannot" dumped on the talk page is how people loose motivation --C-M (talk) 23:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcohujate, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 98.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alparrache, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Almadrones, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Almarail, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:05, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arenillas, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Goluchow, Polonia, 2016-12-21, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Good perspective shot, but there seems to be rather heavy CA (or halos) on the tree branches as well as other edges. Can something be done about that?--Peulle 11:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
✓ New version Poco a poco 18:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC) Much better.--Peulle 15:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estación de Windsor, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buciegas, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 94.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodegas, Morcuera, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blacos, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 00:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beltejar, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berzosa, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

My QI-Nomination St. Antony - Urtijëi - 06

Hallo Poco a poco, I made a completely new version of the file with another method and I think it is much better now. Could you please have again a look of it in the consensual review? Thanks --Llez (talk) 05:50, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuencaliente del Burgo, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp, well lit and good composition via cropping --Granada 07:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuembellida, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-25, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good compositioning, well lit and reasonably sharp --Granada 07:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fombuena, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentThe 5DS R has lots of dynamic range in its RAW files. The sky looks a bit bright - did you try to lower the lights to make it a bit more stand out? --Granada 07:58, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
✓ New version Poco a poco 18:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Looks better now, thank you! --Granada 20:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuentearmegil, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fresneda de la Sierra, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:47, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillejo-Sierra, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Sharpness could be better at the left. --XRay 17:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castil de Tierra, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castellar de la Muela, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa en Moñúx, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Add category of flowers.--Agnes Monkelbaan 19:11, 9 November 2017 (UTC) 19:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castejón de las Armas, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-05, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liceras, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Reneman 18:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinilla de Molina, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Reneman 18:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villar de Domingo García, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 110.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Reneman 18:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peirón, Bello, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torreblacos, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 82.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 20:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Gran Palacio del Kremlin, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 28-29 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gran Palacio del Kremlin, Moscú, Rusia, 2016-10-03, DD 28-29 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa fuerte de Vega de Arias, Tierzo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-25, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 11:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paredes de Sigüenza, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torrecuadradilla, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sienes, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 15:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Montreal desde el Monte Royal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 138-149 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! Good quality. --Basotxerri 13:17, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vista de Montreal desde el Monte Royal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 70-74 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Livioandronico2013 12:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basílica de Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 16-18 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento de Montreal, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-11, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States – Results!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2017? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2017}} to your userpage!

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States during the month of October! The United States contest saw over 1,400 people (the most of any nation this year) contribute over 8,000 great photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the United States and its territories. Hundreds of these photos are already being used to illustrate pages on various Wikimedia projects.

We're excited to announce that our national judging process has concluded, and that we have selected the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States! These photos are recognized for their photographic quality, artistic merit, and their encyclopedic value as illustrations of unique historical sites. We were amazed by all of the uploads, and regret only being able to formally recognize the top 10. That being said – congratulations to our national winners and their amazing shots! Our 10 winners will be sent to the international Wiki Loves Monuments jury, who will then select the winners of the international contest. If you're interested in seeing the winners of the other national contests, you may do so at Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 winners.

If you would like to view all the photos submitted for the U.S. this year, you may do so here.

Finally, we have also created a feedback form for all U.S. participants to fill out. The survey is optional and anonymous, and only takes a minute or two – we hope to use the feedback to organize better events in the future!

A quick thank you to our national jury, as well as Commons editors who have helped categorize and place photos for the event. And finally, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments and helping to preserve our history through photography - we hope to see you again for future Commons photography events!

~Kevin Payravi & Nikikana, from Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States (16:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC))

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States - Distinguished Barnstar

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States - Distinguished Barnstar
For uploading a photo to Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States that has become a featured picture on the Wikimedia Commons and is considered one of the project's finest images. Congratulations - your work is appreciated!

- Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in the United States Organizing Team

Thanks, ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Leere Kategorien

Hallo Poco a poco. Ich habe deine Meldung bei GT1976 mitgelesen - ich verstehe es trotzdem nicht ganz, was daran falsch sein soll, wenn er leere Kategorien füllt. Warum werden diese nich tvorher gelöshct, wenn sie falsch sind. Ich bin kein Freund dieser Kategorien, aber der Fehler liegt doch bei User:Kolforn - wenn ihr diese Cat nicht wollt. lg K@rl (talk) 20:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Hallo K@rl, mir ging es (und leider geht es immer noch, weil das Thema wieder aktuell ist) in erster Linie um diese Edits. Sie sind sinnlos, unabgestimmt und dienen nur dazu den Editcounthunger zu befriedigen. Gruss, Poco2 18:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Ein Foto vom August 2012 in Portugal von Category:August 2012 in Portugal zur Category:August 2012 Portugal photographs zu verschieben, kann kein Fehler sein. Wenn ihr diese Kategorien (und hunderttausende ähnliche) nicht haben wollt, dann müsst ihr sie löschen oder löschen lassen. Wie soll denn ein beliebiger User wissen, wer was auf einer Beobachtungsliste nicht sehen möchte? Es gibt zehntausende dieser Kategorien und es werden massenhaft von verschiedenen Benutzern weitere angelegt. Sind die Bilder in Category:August 2012 Portugal photographs, dann können sie übrigens weiter in die Tageskategorien verschoben werden. Sind diese Bilder nicht in der Kategorie, wird sie keiner weiter verschieben. Benutzer suchen nach verschiednenen Kriterien. Nach Thema, nach Ort und nach Datum. Ich suche historische Bilder meistens nach Datum, daher sortiere ich Bilder gerne in Datumskategorien. Gesperrt wurde ich damals übrigens nicht, weil die Kategorisierung falsch war, sondern wegen mangelnder Diskussionsbereitschaft. Ich habe damals nicht weiter diskutiert, weil mir keiner eine regelkonforme und nachfollziehbare Begründung sagen konnte, warum eine Datei nicht in eine vorhandene Kategorie verschoben werden darf. Man sollte der Meinung sein, dass das allgemeine Interesse mehr Gewichtung hat, als Beobachtungslisten einzelner User. --GT1976 (talk) 19:27, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Wenn diese Verschiebungen nicht gewünscht sind, weil sie die Beobachtungslisten füllen, dann solltedas ein Bot machen - aber warum wird das nicht gemacht. Da versteh ich die Philosophie nicht wirklcih. K@rl (talk) 19:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pedro Palmiches, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tinajas, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:40, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arandilla del Arroyo, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 18:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salmeroncillos de Abajo, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canalejas del Arroyo, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 96.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:41, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción, Albalate de las Nogueras, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa María La Mayor, La Yunta, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-04, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Andrés, Romanillos de Atienza, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mezquita de Tórtoles, Tarazona, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-23, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 15-20 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 19:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC); I´m jealous about the moment- not the pic, but the light´s in the important point from stones, are a pity. And this with your status OMG --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 22:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 06-07 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capilla de Santa María Formosa, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 19:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 13-18 HDR PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 13-18 HDR PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tinajas, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Minor CAs at the antennas and branches, but acceptable. --XRay 18:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villar del Infantado, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salmerón, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would remove motion-blurred birds or birds that seem to be spots. Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valhermoso, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-25, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Inviernas, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arco de los Sergios, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Asunción, Alaminos, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC) -- Great. Hans-Jürgen Neubert 01:24, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morenilla, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The right handside is quite unsharp. To reduce the total impact of unsharpness maybe it would be a good idea to crop a bit on the right, what do you think? --Basotxerri 19:37, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Poco a poco 19:10, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de María Reina del Mundo, Montreal, Canadá, 2017-08-12, DD 46-48 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita, Miedes de Atienza, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita, Miedes de Atienza, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 17:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Masegosa, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 17:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrancacepas, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 15:12, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de Santa Bárbara, Solanillos del Extremo, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:04, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañizares, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aeou 21:31, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arandilla del Arroyo, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:29, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcos de la Sierra, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcos de la Sierra, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:36, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muriel Viejo, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 77-78 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:14, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nafría de Ucero, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 10:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villanueva de Gormaz, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:15, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Candilichera, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aldealafuente, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Buste, Zaragoza, España, 2017-05-23, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villanueva del Rebollar de la Sierra, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 84.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Saturio, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Saturio, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Just not sure about the WB, looks quite on the yellow and purple side. --Uoaei1 07:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Saturio, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:06, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Saturio, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ermita de San Saturio, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 26-28 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:39, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bello, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 04:11, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anfiteatro de Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-16, DD 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Azañón, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beteta, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tepe Sialk, Kashan, Irán, 2016-09-19, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Mall, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 188.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volcanes de lodo, Buzau, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo, Riba de Santiuste, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atienza, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-23, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:52, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moneva, Zaragoza, España, 2017-01-04, DD 97.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Zoma, Teruel, España, 2017-01-04, DD 89.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 22:50, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cañaveruelas, Cuenca, España, 2017-01-03, DD 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:59, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esplegares, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:51, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vindel, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! El Pozuelo, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:52, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armallones, Guadalajara, España, 2017-05-22, DD 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reserva del Estado de Qobustan, Azerbaiyán, 2016-09-27, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:18, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vicuña (Vicugna vicugna), Laguna de Salinas, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Masegoso de Tajuña, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 17:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre, Castil de Tierra, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:46, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nafría de Ucero, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 67.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:46, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo, Muro de Ágreda, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:46, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre, Montejo de Tiermes, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:46, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre, Matalebreras, Soria, España, 2017-05-28, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 11:46, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carrascosa, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 17:47, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Blue flare on Sydney Opera House

Hi Poco,

I’m still new here, so I’m not even sure if I’m sending a message to you or somewhere else. Regarding the blue flare, it’s actually blue light reflected onto a tree in the background. It was during the Vivid festival when there were so many coloured lights projected onto everything in the city. Love your photos and all the best. Cheers, Alphacontrol Alphacontrol (talk) 07:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello Alphacontrol, well, first of all, welcome! I don't talk about the blue lit area behind the light source, but the lens flare just on the right of the light source (I added a note). That is a frequent issue when strong light sources are in front of the camera lens, and should be fixed (by editing). Regards, Poco2 21:43, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Poco, I’ve spent the last 20 minutes looking for the lens flare and can’t see it. Unless you mean the large starburst effect - the big eight point star in front of the blue trees - which to my eyes is beautiful. But if it’s something else your referring to, then unless you were standing beside me pointing to it, I can’t see it. Alphacontrol (talk) 10:13, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

I just had another look, perhaps you mean the blue blobby thing on the right of the trees. I just thought it was more blue trees but if that’s lens flare then I could have a go at removing it in PS. Are you sure it’s lens flare and not just more blue trees? I would have thought lens flare would cover the star burst and obscure a part of it but in fact the star burst is in front of it. Shouldn’t that mean it’s not lens flare, just trees? Anyway you could be right, I used the Canon 85mm 1.8, I know it suffers from chromatic aberration but I thought it handled lens flare well enough. Alphacontrol (talk) 10:52, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Alphacontrol, if you hover your mouse over the picture (not in the page with the FP nomination, but in the photograph page) you will see what I mean. Yes, I talk about that "blobby thing", it is circular, that is a flare, and I don't know of any lens that is flare proof, that is physics, nothing you can do about that if there is a strong light source around. The picture will become anyhow FP but if you are committed to improve the quality if your pictures, you can fix that, it is pretty easy. Poco2 19:02, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catedral de Pula, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 65-67 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catedral de Pula, Pula, Croacia, 2017-04-17, DD 65-67 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre, Matalebreras, Soria, España, 2017-05-28, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:38, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de la Natividad, Vadillo, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 73.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Restos del muro de Augustóbriga, Muro de Ágreda, Soria, España, 2017-05-23, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Villanueva de Gormaz, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:17, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quintanas de Gormaz, Soria, España, 2017-05-26, DD 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 10:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rollo de justicia, Alaminos, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:24, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alaminos, Guadalajara, España, 2017-01-03, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ayuntamiento, Vindel, Cuenca, España, 2017-05-22, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 09:16, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 November 2017 (UTC)