User talk:Poco a poco/2016-09

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de la Torre, Tallinn, Estonia, 2012-08-05, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:34, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Grande, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 86.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puca Pucara, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 80.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente del Mar, Valencia, España, 2014-06-30, DD 166.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Túnel natural, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2016-04-03, DD 05.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Túnel natural, Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2016-04-03, DD 05.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Paracas, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What a cross... Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Tierra, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:19, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Millennium, Londres, Inglaterra, 2014-08-11, DD 126.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI. (P.S. IMO, cropped figures on the left and on the right spoil the composition of the photo. Slightly, but spoil.) Dmitry Ivanov 18:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC).

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta en Alte Bergstrasse, Landshut, Alemania, 2012-05-27, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de Tierra, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 15-17 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente Moskovski, Podgorica, Montenegro, 2014-04-14, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:02, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 63.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:39, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Tulcea, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 14:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Vestmannaeyjar, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente del Mar, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de la Constitución de 1812, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 33-36 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de la Margineda, Santa Coloma, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), Las Bachas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de la Constitución de 1812, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 28-32 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-17, DD 70.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 81.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pelícano pardo de las Galápagos (Pelecanus occidentalis urinator), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 80.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plazuela de la Cárcel, Sigüenza, España, 2015-12-28, DD 142.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza Mayor, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-27, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:25, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Phuket, Tailandia, 2013-08-19, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de la Rada, Tarifa, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-09, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Ceuta, España, 2015-12-10, DD 62.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:41, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

File:2016 Funchal. Madeira Portugal-17.jpg

No es FP, vale. Pero te agradecería que me explicases por que una imagen que es QI y muestra uno de los episodios más deplorables provocados por la humanidad, y acontecido en el mes pasado, no es FP. No lo comprendo. Quizás el defecto esté en la categorización: ¿Podrías ayudarme a categorizarle mejor?: yo no soy capaz. Échame una mano: Para ti no es FP, y no lo entiendo.--Lmbuga (talk) 19:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Déjalo estar: Supongo que la imgen no es muy agraciada: Pidría ser mejor--Lmbuga (talk) 19:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, a ver, no sé como has llegado a la conclusión de que para mí no es FP. Ni siquiera había visto la imagen porque he estado el fin de semana en Túnez dando un curso sobre, precisamente, QI, y no he tenido tiempo para nada. Además, es raro que opine en FP, sí, ya sé que no es bueno, pero cuando lo hacía, lo hacía para todas las imágenes y como pongo el listón alto, siempre tenía líos a los que tenía que dedicarle tiempo, tiempo precioso que preferiría dedicar a otras cosas.

La imagen me gusta pero sí que echo algo de menos, creo que una panorama de varias capturas hubiera sido lo mejor, el corte de la parte derecha me parece algo brusco, lo que le resta balance a la imagen. Saludos y muchas gracias de nuevo por proponer la foto de mi pueblo :)! Poco² 22:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puesto de comida, calle Jirón Ancash, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 79.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Purujosa, Zaragoza, España, 2016-01-02, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:13, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:22, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ermita de la Virgen de la Mencalilla, Almazul, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 33.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ermita de la Virgen de la Mencalilla, Almazul, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 33.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aliso común (Alnus glutinosa), espacio natural protegido Dunarea Veche, Macin, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 12:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delta del Danubio, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Líneas de Nazca, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 61.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navío Xpedition, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 96.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 14:27, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 135.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Tulcea, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Punaluu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, USA6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 05:05, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Muchas gracias

Hola, me paso por aquí para agradecerte sinceramente tu participación en el debate de mi desbloqueo, incluso si ha sido finalmente infructuoso. Tras más de dos años completamente alejado de la interacción con la Wikipedia en Español, me causa gran tristeza el nuevo fracaso de mi petición. Como ya he comentado en mis peticiones de desbloqueo de las últimas semanas, mi única intención es pasar página y seguir contribuyendo al conocimiento libre. Reconozco la frustración de seguir en el mismo punto en el que estábamos en 2012, cuando ya se arguyeron políticas inexistentes para negar un desbloqueo que, aparentemente, cuenta con un respaldo mayoritario por parte de todos aquellos que han querido pronunciarse sobre el tema.

También te lo agradezco porque, posiblemente, no has apoyado mi desbloqueo por tu simpatía o cercanía hacia mí, sino porque crees que ese precisamente no es un argumento relevante y sí el avance del proyecto. Precisamente porque soy consciente de todo lo ocurrido y de todas las cosas que hice mal es que te doy las gracias por querer darme una oportunidad para demostrar con hechos que lo lamento y que deseo reparar los perjuicios causados. No voy a tirar la toalla y seguiré intentando poder volver a reintegrarme en el proyecto, con los mismos deberes que todos los demás, pero también con los mismos derechos. Hasta que esto ocurra, seguiré con mi labor en Wikiexilio, aquí en Commons y en Wikidata.Gracias finalmente por haber dado la cara en un debate en el que lo más cómodo era simplemente quedarse al margen. Un afectuoso saludo --Discasto _talk 15:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Hola Discasto, no hay mucho que agradecer. Como bien apuntas lo que he hecho, lo he hecho por convencimiento de que es lo mejor para el proyecto. Una lástima que otros antepongan otros intereses al proyecto, y un prejuicio para el futuro de la wiki en español. Ya sabes dónde estamos, un saludo! Poco² 20:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

FP lies

He estado intentando colaborar en FP pues tú me dijiste que se aprendía. En un inicio, sin proponer nada, intente votar; después observando; y...

No entiendo nada. Quizás yo sea el raro: No se trata de la opinión sobre mis fotos, se trata de que la opinión sobre las demás es un verdadero sinsentido.

En mi opinión: "No me acabo de creer que se admita tal connivencia por todos los participantes, que no haya nadie que lo exprese".

Supongo que no sé nada. Lo cual es casi saber más de lo que pienso que sé; pero se vota el nombre, no la foto. Está claro.--Lmbuga (talk) 19:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quizás me pase a mí (y a otros) eso en QI--Lmbuga (talk) 19:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC). Menos mal que en QI no me dedico a ver si las opiniones de otros están justificadas, aunque antes -cuando creaba conflicto, sí lo hacía.--Lmbuga (talk) 19:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Me parece imposible aprender en ese espacio (FP) sin tener referencias. Tú, ¿de quién te fías?--Lmbuga (talk) 19:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Disculpa la pregunta. Improcedente. No espero que la respondas--Lmbuga (talk) 19:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Tú podrías ser una referencia, pero, si evitas manifestarte en contra de mis fotos, no puedes serlo--Lmbuga (talk) 19:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Hola Miguel, estoy de acuerdo contigo en que hay juicios que no cuadran del todo y opiniones en contra o a favor que tienen poco sentido. Yo no es que me fíe o no de nadie. A lo largo de estos años creo saber quién vota a favor o en contra porque cree que la imagen merece ese voto y también quién vota por razones menos loables. Si quieres, puedes consultarme por correo sobre alguna imagen que vayas a proponer, o incluso puedo echar un ojo a tus candidatos y darte mi opinión. Como verás, no participo apenas en FP expresando mi opinión sobre otras imágenes porque en el pasado al hacerlo, y hacerlo con sinceridad, independientemente de quien proponga la imagen o sea su autor, a menudo me veía envuelto en discusiones a las que tenía que dedicarles tiempo y nervios. Prefiero dedicar mi tiempo a mis fotografías que a discutir, sinceramente. Un saludo! Poco² 20:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Por cierto, ¿realmente File:Col-d'Izoard-Queyras-DSC 0130.jpg es FP? No puedo creerlo... Salvo por quien la firma (le ha dado con betún a las zonas oscuras?)--Lmbuga (talk) 20:43, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Lo que sí comprendo es que solamente propongas en esa página (FPC), y que no opines. Sí, siempre he pensado que QIC necesitaba un cambio... pero FP necesita cambio y medio, al menos, cualquiera que tenga un poco de idea se da cuenta de la importancia del apellido: Eso va a espantar a usuarios (yo entre ellos).

No vuelvo. Espero mantenerme en QIC un tiempo. Todo se contamina. Cuando los desarraigados de FP salten a (o consideren en serio si no precisan saltar) QI, los de QI nos "tocaremos las pelotas". Disculpa la grosería. Esperemos que no se cansen de votar imágenes por nombre y apellido, además de valor real (hay imágenes increíbles, algunas tuyas)--Lmbuga (talk) 20:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Loable que no quieras discutir. Te preguntaré algún día sobre alguna imagen mía, pero será una imagen que no vaya a proponer: Tengo en demasiada estima la relación contigo como para mediatizarla con tonterías: Si te preguntase sobre una imagen y tú no la votases tras yo proponerla, ¿que pasaría entre nosotros? No te verás en esas conmigo. Nunca me jugaré la relación en la lotería de las opiniones y las aparencias. Te estimo por encima de eso.

(Me ha quedado más bonito de lo que esperaba)--Lmbuga (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Yo, con mi nivel de inglés, sí que no puedo perder tiempo; pero no puedo perderlo en ningún lado.--Lmbuga (talk) 21:12, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Chipiona, España, 2015-12-08, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Q--Lmbuga 16:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Placas tectónicas de Eurasia y Norteamérica, Suðurnes, Islandia, 2014-08-13, DD 026-028 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pisac, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 101.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good Q--Lmbuga 16:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente del Mar, Valencia, España, 2014-06-29, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ermita de la Purísima Concepción, Sástago, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-23, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cobeta, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:32, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Amsterdam train station

Being recently at the same location at blue hour, I saw this photo and I was wondering, how you have no ghosts of people? Also, in case I don't have the opportunity to notice somewhere else, the aspect ratio is wrong (see the clocks, they are oval) and it is tilted CCW. --C messier (talk) 12:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

C messier: easy, there is no ghosts because there was no people :) You probably had good weather when you were there, I had a terrible one (rain didn't give me a break). Thanks for the hints, I made some changes and uploaded a new version, it looks better now indeed. Poco² 13:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vista de Quito desde El Panecillo, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 25-29 PAN.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Quito desde El Panecillo, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 25-29 PAN.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edificio principal de la Universidad Humboldt, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 25-27 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 12:32, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle 17 de Junio, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 19-21 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 12:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento Rojo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 34-36 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very nice (a pity that the crane was there). --Code 12:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa de las Culturas del Mundo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Building is slightly leaning backwards, please fix that. And it would be good if you could clone out the light trail at the top, too. --Code 12:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC) True,  fixed Poco a poco 19:04, 7 September 2016 (UTC)  Support Ok. --Code 21:51, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto de Vestmannaeyjar, Heimaey, Islas Vestman, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 021.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality, but please some sharpening halos and CA (left side). --ArildV 16:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 18:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC) Thank you, QI and nice now--ArildV 10:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC) ArildV, would you then promote? Poco a poco 12:00, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Sorry, my mistake.--ArildV 20:10, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerta de la Concepción, Catedral de Sevilla, Sevilla, España, 2015-12-06, DD 89.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Persp.dist. Please have a look to my annotations. --Jebulon 19:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)  New version, thanks for the feedback, Poco a poco 17:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC) Seems to have worked --Daniel Case 06:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ayuntamiento Rojo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Super! --Pudelek 12:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Columna de la Victoria, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 13-15 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice --Pudelek 12:39, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Estación Central, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 07-09 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:33, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biblioteca Central de la Universidad de Bucarest, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 97-99 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Kretzulescu, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banco Nacional de Rumanía, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 52-54 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:57, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casino de Constanza, Constanza, Rumania, 2016-05-27, DD 01-03 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio CEC, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 91-93 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa consistorial, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some CA along the line where roof/structure meets sky. Please fix! :) W.carter 18:53, 7 September 2016 (UTC)  Fixed please, check! :) Poco a poco 22:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC) Ok, good enough. QI. --W.carter 08:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some CA to fix, see notes. The whole picture is a bit noisy, but it's also a rather large file, so all in all ok IMO as soon as the CA is fixed. W.carter 18:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 22:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC) Great! Good quality. --W.carter 08:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Images from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Spain without BIC template

Hola Diego, como ya lo tenía programado, he puesto al bot a correr con una tarea bastante simple: encontrar las fotos que no tienen plantilla {{BIC}}. En principio, entiendo que la mayor parte deberían ser imágenes que vienen de pueblos sin imagen, así que os puede ayudar a clasificar. Ahh, cuando saquéis fotos de la categoría, dime dónde las estáis poniendo, así no las recategorizaré eternamente. Un saludo y gracias por todo --Discasto _talk 08:43, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Hola Discasto, ayer retiré dos imágenes mías de la categoría pero después de incluir la plantilla BIC (eso sí con un s/n, dado que se trataba de un castillo). Por lo demás, he ajustado un par de categorías (eran genéricas y las he adaptado con el sufijo WLM 16). Lo que nos vendría muy bien son tus estadísticas, sobre todo usuarios, usuarios nuevos, BICs por usuario. Eso sí, no a partir de todas las imágenes, sino más bien a partir de las inéditas, a saber, las que están en Category:Images of monuments of Spain without photograph WLM 2016. Saludos! Poco² 08:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Hola Diego, la verdad es que me encantaría generar las estadísticas, pero es una tarea que me llevaría bastante tiempo (los concursos parecen iguales pero cada uno tiene una casuística muy distinta -en este caso, la ausencia de códigos para todos los monumentos, la mezcla de monumentos y municipios y que, al final, la gente está subiendo fotos de monumentos que ya tienen fotos... un lío, por no hablar de que la mayor parte de las fotos provienen de la "edición" de Amical, para darte una idea, ahora mismo, solo 842 de 3775 tienen la plantilla {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2016|es}}-), que no tengo (el jueves comienzo el máster y se acabó lo que se daba), y para la que tampoco tengo ánimo, si te soy sincero. Existen muchos socios en WM-ES con conocimientos de programación que seguro que podrían encargarse del asunto. Te sugiero que saques el asunto en la lista de correo o en el grupo de Telegram. Seguro que alguien podrá encargarse. Un abrazo y gracias --Discasto _talk 09:46, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Vezio, Varenna, Italia, 2016-06-25, DD 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Not the sharpnest around, but OK for me. --C messier 12:15, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Nueva, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 10-12 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia Kretzulescu, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 68.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Nicolás, Ámsterdam, Países Bajos, 2016-05-30, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral de San Pedro y San Pablo, Constanza, Rumania, 2016-05-27, DD 04-06 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Muy bien! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 23-26 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 55-66 HDR PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 41-43 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality.--ArildV 10:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective preservation. QI. --Peulle 07:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 18-21 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 38-40 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:21, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 70-72 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Museo Bode, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 30-Edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo Bode, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 28-30 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 67-69 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some halos/CAs on the windows on the right upper side. Could you remove them, please? --Basotxerri 15:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 18:52, 14 September 2016 (UTC) OK now! --Basotxerri 21:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:31, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mezquita Slimane Hamza, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:37, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Crops e imagenes de calidad

Aupa Poco a poco,

tengo una pregunta: ¿qué pasa en los casos cuando una foto tuya ya es QI y sacas un crop? ¿Ese crop se puede o debe presentar de nuevo en las nominaciones de images de calidad o sería automáticamente una QI?

Saludos desde Vitoria,

--Basotxerri (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Hola Basotxerri, no, no puedes, es una obra derivada. Si la primera no es QI y creas una versión distinta, entonces puedes proponer la derivada a QI, pero entonces no la original. Saludos, Poco² 03:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Hola Poco a poco, no sé si te entiendo bien. Si una imagen no es QI, la obra derivada sí lo puede ser pero ya no el original. Si una images es QI, ¿la obra derivada no puede presentarse y no puede ser QI? --Basotxerri (talk) 15:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Hola Basotxerri. Si una imagen es QI, su original o sus derivadas no podrán serlo. En otras palabras, si la original o una derivada de ella son QIs, ninguna más podrá serlo. Exáctamente. Si la imagen original es QI, la derivada no podrá serlo. Poco² 18:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Hola Poco², ¡muchas gracias por la explicación! Saludos desde Vitoria, --Basotxerri (talk) 20:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuevo crematorio, Campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memorial judío, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Comandancia, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 07-12 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memorial judío, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barracas de prisioneros, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 05-07 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcos junto al anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit on the bright side, but actually not overexposed. Good quality. --W.carter 10:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

„Уики обича паметниците 2016“ започва! :)

Здравей!

Организационният екип на фотоконкурса „Уики обича паметниците“ те кани от 15 септември до 14 октомври да участваш на тазгодишното издание на конкурса и да помогнеш за съхраняването на културното наследство на България и илюстрирането на свободната енциклопедия Уикипедия. Изпратихме ти това писмо, тъй като знаем за твоята съпричастност към уикипедианската кауза от участието ти в някое от досегашните издания на състезанията „Уики обича паметниците“ или „Уики обича Земята“ през 2015 или 2016 година.

Отново търсим твоите снимки от културните паметници на България – манастири и църкви, възрожденска архитектура, автентични крепости, музеи и музейни експонати. И тази година няма ограничения на броя снимки, с които можеш да участваш в конкурса. 25, 50, 100 или повече – зависи от теб! Както всички фотографски конкурси в Уикимедия, най-важното условие е, че трябва да предоставиш снимките си под свободен лиценз, без водни знаци и други надписи с декларации за авторството върху тях. Още за правилата на конкурса можеш да прочетеш оттук.

Най-добрите 10 снимки, които журито класира от националния кръг на конкурса, ще продължат в международния кръг на „Уики обича паметниците“, където ще представят страната ни. А авторът на снимката-победител на международния кръг ще получи като награда участие на световната уики-конференция „Уикимания“, която ще се проведе през август 2017 година в Монреал, Канада.

Но по-важното е, че твоите снимки междувременно ще помогнат за илюстрирането на съществуващите статии в Уикипедия, а защо не и да вдъхновят написването на нови статии, свързани с българската култура и история! Благодарим ти предварително за всяка една твоя снимка, с която допринасяш към свободното познание!

Поздрави,

Екипът на „Уики обича паметниците“! (Доставено от MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC))

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ayuntamiento Rojo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ayuntamiento Rojo, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 37-39 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabo de Kaliakra, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caballero de Madara, reserva histórico-arqueológica Nacional de Madara, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:19, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK. --Peulle 07:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:34, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 35-37 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:07, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aliso común (Alnus glutinosa), espacio natural protegido Dunarea Veche, Macin, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:39, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Arco de Triunfo, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 23.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arco de Triunfo, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Мирослав Видрак 18:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ollagüe, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 73.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Gobierno, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 109.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), Las Bachas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 55-66 HDR PAN.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 55-66 HDR PAN.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volcán Paniri, Chile, 2016-02-09, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casino de Montecarlo, Mónaco, 2016-06-23, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 05:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pinseque, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality but it would be nice if you could clone out the branches at the right side. --Code 05:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente de la Constitución de 1812, Cádiz, España, 2015-12-08, DD 21-24 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 05:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 07:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora de la Asunción, Deza, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Hortal, Torrijo de la Cañada, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-29, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Cocos, Rumanía, 2016-05-28, DD 96-98 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 02:44, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo Bode, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 30-Edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. :-) Ikan Kekek 05:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bosque de Piedra, provincia de Varna, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 68-70 PAN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 05:19, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biblioteca Central de la Universidad de Bucarest, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-29, DD 71.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 05:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capilla católica, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object, but it might need a little perspective correction. IMO- cloudy sky adds something to the sphere of the image. --Michielverbeek 06:26, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campamento de Chuquicamata, Calama, Chile, 2016-02-01, DD 96.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabo de Kaliakra, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabo de Kaliakra, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio marino, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcos junto al anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:03, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Chévere! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrocarril de muestra TER Fiat TER 9701, Calatayud, España, 2016-06-21, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Muy elegante y bien puesto! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:10, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museo de la iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 181.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paisaje en Cerro Brujo, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 97.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de los Altamira, Almazán, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 69.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelícanos peruanos (Pelecanus thagus), puerto de Paracas, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:24, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de armas, San Antonio de Ibarra, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de Riazor, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 93.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playa de la Punta Roja, Marsella, Francia, 2016-06-22, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plasencia de Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-12-30, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:49, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), Punta Pitt, isla de San Cristóbal, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-24, DD 37.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:50, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bab El Bhar, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de los Altamira, Almazán, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 68.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:00, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Cihuela, Soria, España, 2015-12-29, DD 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ElBute 11:23, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 41-43 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anfiteatro, El Jem, Túnez, 2016-09-04, DD 41-43 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Vezio, Varenna, lago de Como, Italia, 2016-06-25, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cámara de gas, nuevo crematorio, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Acceptable noise. --XRay 06:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caballero de Madara, reserva histórico-arqueológica Nacional de Madara, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antiguo puerto, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antigua azucarera labradora, Calatayud, España, 2016-06-21, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:30, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuerte Bordj el Kebir, Mahdia, Túnez, 2016-09-03, DD 31-33 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Stunning colors. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:57, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cobeta, Guadalajara, España, 2016-01-05, DD 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calle 17 de Junio, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 16-18 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capilla católica, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cámara de gas, nuevo crematorio, campo de concentración de Dachau, Alemania, 2016-03-05, DD 29-31 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:03, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cámara Alta de Prusia, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-22, DD 49-51 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fernsehturm, Berlín, Alemania, 2016-04-21, DD 40-42 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 06:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesias rupestres de Basarbovo, Bulgaria, 2016-05-27, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland!

Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland

Hallo Poco a poco!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2016! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über 38.988 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 18. Oktober die Gelegenheit Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Alle Informationen zur Vorjury findest Du hier.

An dieser Stelle sei noch auf die Preisverleihung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland hingewiesen: Diese findet am 25. November 2016 ab 20 Uhr in den Räumen von Wikimedia Deutschland in Berlin statt. Alle Interessierten laden wir ganz herzlich zur Teilnahme ein. Für die Fotografen der Top-10-Bilder und die Sonderpreisträger werden Reisekosten sowie eine Übernachtung durch Wikimedia Deutschland übernommen.

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden. (DCB im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 01.10.2016)