User talk:Pierre Audité
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Filnik 10:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
TUSC token f730a03a3770e2aa57f21c21a0e8ab3a
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 06bf852cda1a72b9cc456054040d4dbf
[edit]Hallo Pierre Audité,
kannst du bei diesem Wappen bitte die einzelnen Felder noch mit einer deutlich sichtbaren schwarzen Linie wie in der PNG-Vorlage voneinander trennen? Derart dünne weiße Linien wie in der jetzigen SVG-Datei sind in der Heraldik, die auf leichte Erkennbarkeit abzielt, ungebräuchlich. Viele Grüße --Rosenzweig δ 17:33, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Hallo Rosenzweig! Ja, eben. Die gute Erkennbarkeit. Die Heraldik sagt, dass die Teilung und Spaltung deutlich erkennbar sein soll. Und durch die 4 Löwen wird die Teilung - meiner Meinung nach - sehr deutlich. Aber ich sehe schon (auch aus anderen Rückmeldungen) dass das durchaus umstritten ist. Meiner Meinung nach wird viel zu oft, und völlig unnötig zu den schwarzen Linien gegriffen. Sie gibt es ja eigentlich in der Heraldik gar nicht. Dort wo wichtige Strukturen im Umfeld des Wappen verschwinden würden, kommt man ohne die schwarze Linien nicht aus. Aber nicht dort wo zum Beispiel die Teilung deutlich sichtbar ist. Vielleicht sollten sich zu diesem Thema noch ein paar weitere interessierte Herolde äußern. --Pierre Audité (talk) 22:29, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
COA image deletion
[edit]Please don't ask for deletion of images without discussing with image authors TomKr 22:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
File:Blason ville de Sarrelouis.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Juergenk59 (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Blason Sarre 1947-1956.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |