User talk:PhilFree
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons:License questions. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
Licence GFDL douteuse
[edit]Salut Phil! Tu as utilisé le tag {{GFDL}} pour cette image. Or il mes semble que ce serait plutôt du {{PDold}} ou une autre licence. Il n'y a pas non plus de source sur cette image, merci de la rajouter. Je tagge l'image avec le tag informations manquantes, tu peux l'enlever dès que tu as rajouté les infos manquantes. A bientôt ! notafish }<';> 13:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- C'est fait, j'ai mis {{PDold}}. Cordialement PhilFree 14:25, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merci mais t'as toujours pas mis la source. D'où elle vient, cette image? ! notafish }<';> 04:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- A ma grande honte je n'en sais plus rien, elle traînait sur mon disque dur, mais Tschudi est mort depuis plus de 400 ans... PhilFree 08:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merci mais t'as toujours pas mis la source. D'où elle vient, cette image? ! notafish }<';> 04:45, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Luis_Echeverria_Alvarez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
ˉanetode╦╩ 01:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright | Image:Miguel Alemán Valdés.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
-Esteban Zissou 08:20, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
File:Battle of New Orleans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Infrogmation (talk) 19:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Juan_Martin_Pueyrredon.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Juan_Martin_Pueyrredon.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Juan_Martin_Pueyrredon.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Belgrano (talk) 19:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Pedro_de_Ampudia.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Pedro_de_Ampudia.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Morelia aqueduct.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Morelia aqueduct.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Morelia aqueduct.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Denniss (talk) 00:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Category:Campaigns_of_American_Civil_War has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Nyttend (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
File:Escudo de Matamoros.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
De728631 (talk) 19:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
File:1920 Alta California mission trail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ricky81682 (talk) 02:35, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
File:1920 Baja California mission trail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ricky81682 (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]
The image File:Thure de Thulstrup - Battle of Shiloh.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thure de Thulstrup - Battle of Shiloh.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
File:Angel de la Independencia Mexico City.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |