User talk:Peteruetz
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 04:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Sistrurus vs Crotalus head scales.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Sistrurus vs Crotalus head scales.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Sistrurus vs Crotalus head scales.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
--Killarnee (T•1•2) 14:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Targets of type III effectors in plants.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Sealle (talk) 09:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Divisome.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Divisome.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Sealle (talk) 09:43, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mouse 5HT3 receptor structure.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mouse 5HT3 receptor structure.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mouse 5HT3 receptor structure.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Sealle (talk) 09:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Human-mouse synteny.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Human-mouse synteny.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Sealle (talk) 09:48, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
copyright notices
[edit]Not sure if you have noticed that but all the images I have uploaded have copyright notices / permissions. Just read the documents in the files, e.g. [1] has a section "Licensing". You are mainly wasting my time ... Peteruetz (talk) 15:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- First of all, I've reviewed sources you provided, and some of them have non-compatible licenses, see COM:Licensing. Secondly, see COM:EVID to know how to prove your claims. Sealle (talk) 15:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Deuterostome phylogeny.png
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Deuterostome phylogeny.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Sealle (talk) 09:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Protein domains and DUFs in different domains of life.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sealle (talk) 09:57, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Missing licenses / permissions
[edit]Please READ the license statements / permission notes included in each image file. They are THERE, you just have to look and READ them. Thanks. Example: [2]. Peteruetz (talk) 16:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Again, Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license is not allowed on WM Commons, see Commons:Licensing#Well-known licenses. Please stop posting your messages on my talk page, you're now at the proper place for discussion. Sealle (talk) 16:10, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, Thanks for the clarification, although it makes NO sense at all. Is there a justification for NOT allowing CC NC SA licenses? The CC site [[3]] explicitly allows to "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format" (with attribution). Peteruetz (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Commons:Licensing: Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that are not subject to copyright restrictions which would prevent them being used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. This project is for a free content, that's it. Sealle (talk) 16:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- At least one of the images I have posted has a CC BY 4.0 license, which is stated on the original paper to which I have linked ([[4]]) Isn't such a link sufficient?Peteruetz (talk) 17:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- And I've already confirmed files like this: [5]. Sealle (talk) 17:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- I have changed the permission for this figure. It's own work. See revised figure comments. Peteruetz (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- And I've already confirmed files like this: [5]. Sealle (talk) 17:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- At least one of the images I have posted has a CC BY 4.0 license, which is stated on the original paper to which I have linked ([[4]]) Isn't such a link sufficient?Peteruetz (talk) 17:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Commons:Licensing: Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that are not subject to copyright restrictions which would prevent them being used by anyone, anytime, for any purpose. This project is for a free content, that's it. Sealle (talk) 16:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, Thanks for the clarification, although it makes NO sense at all. Is there a justification for NOT allowing CC NC SA licenses? The CC site [[3]] explicitly allows to "Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format" (with attribution). Peteruetz (talk) 16:22, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove deletion requests
[edit]
--Sealle (talk) 16:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- What about if the deletion request is completely unfounded, as in most of your cases? There are clear permission statements or at least links to the original papers with CC statements. Peteruetz (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
File:F34-Nichtehelichenquote-Europa.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Wdwd (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- It's NOT a copyright violation, it's a violation of Wikipedia rules at best, which you can enforce or don't but that has nothing to do with copyright, just to clarify that point. Peteruetz (talk) 18:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)