User talk:Perituss

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pay attention to copyright
File:Makoto Shinkai 2012.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

1989 (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 08:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biarritz 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Bronze Horseman 2013 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is a sharpening halo around the statue --Poco a poco 20:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for review, new version uploaded, is it better? --Perituss 19:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes, it is. --Poco a poco 19:37, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enhuberstrasse Munchen 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs perspective correction. --Ermell 17:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for review, new version uploaded, is it better? --Perituss 18:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window Mucha 2010 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schadowstrasse 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 17:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stephen I 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 17:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train approaches BVG gate 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pink Young Hare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting composition, but it needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 17:59, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
right part perspective not perfect, but good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 19:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zelenograd 9th 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
lacks sharpness --Nikride 11:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC))[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review. Is it better now? --Perituss 18:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support much better --Nikride 19:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg 2014 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train approaches BVG gate 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Matthias Church 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I'm not sure, may be tilted CW. Sharpness acceptable, but not the best. --XRay 07:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Eye 2011 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA --Nikride 13:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks. Does it look better? --Perituss 15:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 19:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fisherman's Bastion 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA --Nikride 13:37, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks. Does it look better? --Perituss 15:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better --Nikride 19:13, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geschwister-Scholl-Platz fountain 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg 2014 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg 2014 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hampton Court 2011 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Difficult, it's a bit underexposed, there is a fringe between wall and sky and sharpness is not really good --Poco a poco 06:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Fringe between wall and sky eliminated. --Perituss 20:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Ok, let's let it through --Poco a poco 06:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Széchenyi Chain Bridge 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water tower Podebrady.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pisa Cathedral 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 18:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via dei Condotti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 21:20, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great Hall Moscow Conservatory 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 19:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peterhof 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 19:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Bonaparte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Pretty distorted (otherwise good) --Plozessor 04:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for the review. Is it better now? --Perituss 14:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Yes! Good quality. --Plozessor 18:46, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hruba Skala Railway Station 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg 2014 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:57, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza del Campo 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaci utca 2014 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 07:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peterhof 2013 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky 2023 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:18, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vedogon-teatr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Underexposed imo. --ArildV 07:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also need a category for the theater. --ArildV 07:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you for the review. Is it better now? --Perituss 19:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you, good quality. --ArildV 08:26, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palazzo Blu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siena Cathedral 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salzburg 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pereslavl-Zalessky 2023 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bohemian Switzerland 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Bit on the noisy side but still ok. I approve of the beer price ;-) --MB-one 10:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Barbara Kutna Hora 2010 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please review the crop --Moroder 10:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Perituss 21:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Moroder 10:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windmill No.2 from Moshok.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 15:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Resurrection of Christ from Patakino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 15:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]