User talk:Paju~commonswiki/Archive1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1 of User talk:Paju

[edit]

Kaupunginosakartat

[edit]

Olet tehnyt hienoa työtä kaupunginosakarttojen kanssa. Itse olen käyttänyt niitä ruotsinkielisessä wikissä kun olen laittanut lisää tietoa Helsingin kaupunginosa-artikkeleihin. Joitakin karttoja puuttuu vielä ja olisi mukavaa jos voisit jossain vaiheessa tehdä niitä lisää, itse kun en osaa. Peruspiireistä puuttuu ainakin seuraavat kartat: Laajasalon pp, Puistolan pp, Vanhankaupungin pp ja Ullanlinnan pp. Lisäksi ei ole kaupunginosakarttaa Santahaminasta ja Suomenlinnasta (joka on myös kaupunginosa!). Migro 17:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hei, kiitos palautteesta Migro. Suomenlinna, Santahamina, Länsisaaret, Itäsaaret ja Helsinginniemen eteläosa ovat mulla tietoisesti jonkin aikaa jäähyllä; rajojen kulku on kyllä jo selvitetty. Laitan "tilapäiset" kartat Puistolan ja Vanhakaupungin pp:stä hetken kuluttua jakeluun; Ullanlinna ja Santahamina vaatisivat karttalaajenuksen.
Olin jo alunperin tähdännyt kaikkien karttojen ajantasaistamiseen seuraavan "rundin" aikana joskus loka-marraskuu seutuvilla. Tuolloin pyrin esim. laittamaan meren vaalean siniseksi ja tuomaan peruspiirikartoissa myös suurpiirit esille. Olin ajatellut laittaa värityksen keskustelulistalle, kun saan koko Helsingin karttapohjan laajennuksen tehtyä & uuden värihierarkian mietittyä. Eteläisimpiin kaupunginosiin + saarien kuvaamiseen tarvitaan parannettu, erityisesti etelään leviävä kartta, johon lisätään esimerkiksi nyt puuttuvat/suljetut Vallisaari, Pukkisaari ja Kuninkaansaari Suomenlinnan ja Santahaminan välille sekä ainakin Pihlajasaaret ja Melkki, + luokkaa 10 suosituinta isoa ulkoilu/sotilassaarta... Ilman Suomenlinnaa suurempaa Vallisaarta jne sekä Suomenlinnan/ Ullanlinnan pp että Santahaminan/ Laajasalon pp kartat olisivat hassua itsesensuuria. Mielestäni kaupunginosa-artikkeleissa voi kirjoittaa muustakin kuin asukkaista; erityisesti saarien kohdalla kulttuuri- ja virkistysarvot ovat meille merelläkin liikkuville kaupunkilaisille tärkeitä juttuja ja ansaitsevat tulla esille.
Vantaalle tein vähän onnistumennin väritettyjä karttoja. Siellä kaikista kaupunginosista on olemassa kartat, joissa sekä kaupunginosa että palvelualue näkyy. => Helsinkiin ajattelin pp karttoja, joissa myös suurpiiri näkyisi vastaavasti.
Yhtenä muuna proggiksena mulla on eri kaupunginosia koskevien valokuvien rätkiminen ja erityisesti PKS-seudun 1990+2000-luvun kiinnostavien arkkitehtuurikohteiden dokumentointi. => Väriä artikkeleihin (yritän välttää sateisia päiviä) ja toivottavasti ilonaiheita! Aika hauskojakin kohteita joukossa, joista ei vielä matkaoppaissa kerrota, mutta arkkitehtuuri tms. lehdissä jo. Kun matskua vähän enemmän kasassa, juttuja / kuvia alkaa ehkä ruveta tippumaan luokkaa kuukauden (??) päästä... Luulen, että tuo kuvitus/kohteiden -lisäyshanke kestää ainakin vuoden tai pari.
On tosi hienoa, että teet/uusit artikkeleja ruotsiksi. Kun saataisiin vielä joku tekemään samaa englanniksi, (ranskaksi, saksaksi, viroksi ja venäjäksi)... :) --Paju 21:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OHO, luokitus...

[edit]

File:BLR Minsk National library of Belarus 1.jpg

[edit]
File:BLR Minsk National library of Belarus 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.61.181.19 21:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BLR Minsk National library of Belarus 2.jpg

[edit]
File:BLR Minsk National library of Belarus 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

84.61.181.19 21:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grodno church 1a.jpg

[edit]

Привет, Paju! У меня вопрос об этих изображениях. У файла "Grodno church 1a" нет даты. Возможно, она та же, что и у "Grodno church 1b"?

Доктор рукиноги (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Privet Doktor rukinogi, you are right! Both of these photos were taken in early October 2009. I'm not quite sure of the date, it may be 8.10.2009. Thus I added in precaution, "October 2009," because in October these images were downloaded to my computer. The raw image size was about 1.2 MB, or about 3000 * 2300 pixels.--Paju (talk) 00:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 23:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Upload failures

[edit]

Hello, thanks for your lovely Finnish photos and your report at [1]. It seems you managed to upload files at the end? But you don't need to reduce their size, you can and should upload them at high resolution. Let me know if that still fails, I'd like to see your photos at higher resolution. --Nemo 08:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, upload was successful later when I downloaded these files some 2-4 separate lots. There was a annual photo competition in fi-wikipedia which I participated. In principle, I do not share full size pics here. 1) Firstly: to give privacy to the persons in pictures, 2) to hide security related infrastructure of schools, firms, court houses, office buildings, etc. and 3) thirdly: there are users who do not give any credits to the photographers sharing their photos in Commons when using the photo files :-( . Sometimes mentioning "photo from Commons" is included, sometimes there is no mention at all of the origin. Thus, I share full resolution photos for more controlled user groups, e.g. for scientific use, my friends etc, upon request. --Paju (talk) 13:22, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minsk photos

[edit]

Hello! Last month you filed a deletion request for a bunch of Minsk photos. Many of these photos were in use in Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, and other Wikimedia projects. Now we have empty spaces and red links instead of these photos. As you mentioned that these photos can be uploaded locally, could you do so and repair the damage imparted to several Wikimedia projects? Thank you!

Additionally, I stay bewildered by warnings that you added to several categories including this one. How should I treat multiple photos that remain there? --Atsirlin (talk) 15:37, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not my job to correct issues caused by faulty / illegal storage of photos into Commons. One should not use photos which are stored in Commons with faulty copyright. Please refer to copyright discussions of Commons and local legistlation. So if some application in wikis or elsewhere is dependent of illegal photos previously or currently stored in Commons, then he/ she who picks these photos, or creates/ uses software to do so, has the legal problem and possible results of that. The process and rules of Commons say that such photos shall be removed. Kindly note - sorry to say - there are still thousands of such photos (of non-FOP) in Commons which are due to be removed! I am not the only person suggesting removal of unauthorized photos from Commons. PS. E.g. citation approach requires quite a lot of work to figure who is the designer/ architect/ sculptor behind each work and if it is >50 years since all these persons were alive! --Paju (talk) 19:20, 2 November 2013 (UTC), whistleblower[reply]
You still have not answered my second question.
Regarding the first one, it is not a serious excuse. What you gained so far is an insignificant improvement of the copyright situation on Commons at the cost of a serious damage to many articles across different projects and different languages. What worries me most is that those projects have no way of tracking which images are proposed for deletion here until the files are eventually deleted and lost. Therefore, I kindly ask you to make sure that you notify projects using the photos (not the original uploaders, who are remotely interested in this!) before any future deletions. It will be also very kind from your side if you help with uploading useful photos locally. This is a natural way of communication and collaboration between the projects.
Finally, the rest of your message is nothing but a naive and idealistic way of thinking. We can not expect all users on all projects to have solid understanding of every subtle detail of Commons policies. There are several reasons behind it: i) Wikimedia Commons is considered a trusted source of photos; we don't have to re-assess every photo before using it in other projects; ii) there is no clear-cut explanation of what is allowed and what is not (it looks like you don't know it yourself, because in Belarus copyright expires in 70 years, not in 50 years as you mentioned); iii) the current situation on Commons is at best inconsistent as I mentioned in my second question above; iv) most people do not understand the difference between the copyrighted photo uploaded on Commons and the same photo uploaded locally under fair use. It is still the same copyrighted photo being incorporated into the CC-BY-SA content.
I will highly appreciate if you think about these issues before filing any future deletion requests, because starting a request and pressing the button is simple, but it brings no good to anyone. --Atsirlin (talk) 06:40, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Respecting copyrights is vital issue to artists and designers. That is the point of copyright laws, Commons rules and also here. A photographer of artwork can give only some technical right for technical usage of the photo (with CC he/she does not ask money, but mentioning of person/ alias is needed in many cases). But he/she typically does not have copyright of the artwork, so she/he does not have right and can not give away free publication rights. Therefore, publishers like Commons or other wikimedia, or other users of such photos still need to respect the copyright laws protecting artistic works, i.e. the artists or their heirs/ agency. One can store photos in wikipedias with much stricter licences and publication policies; e.g. in fiwikipedia, there must be description of the artworks and key artists included. Otherwise it is not accepted as artwork photo / citation approach, and cannot be stored in fi-wiki. These rules vary somewhat/ much from country to country, I guess. Back to point A: So typically, if there is no freedom of panorama - like in France or Belarus - photographers may take pictures, but they do not have the copyright of the modern or relatively recent artwork published even in the open sphere - like paintings, sculpture, buildings, etc. (which is typically valid 50-70 years after artists are dead). You are not allowed to start selling postcards / calenders / miniature models etc. showing these objects under copyright, without requesting publishing right from the copyright holder. I am not sure if authorities can charge users violating the copyright, unless the copyright holder requests it. But I guess it is possible in case the user belongs to too noisy opposition... (?) Please discuss with local legal experts or open discussion boards of your wiki or Commons. This is not technical helpdesk nor legal one. Thus I'll close this discussion. PS. Sometimes warnings are needed so that people/ users understand that it is not ok to continue practices which are against the Commons rules & legistlation... E.g. photos of key works of V. Kramarenka et. co. (like national library) have been "unstable" also earlier. --Paju (talk) 00:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tiedoksi

[edit]

Onneksi olkoon, kirkkokuvasi on päässyt Hesariin [2]. Keskustelua aiheesta myös Kahvihuoneessa. Yt, -Htm (talk) 15:27, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mitä tälle asialle kuuluu? Mitä on tehty? Onko jossain suljettu foorumi, missä toimenpiteistä keskustellaan?? Eihän oikeuskäytännöissä yleensä vastaajalle (rikoksesta epäillylle) kerrota asianomaisen puolustuksen linjausta välttämättä, vaikka rikosilmoitusta seuraava poliisitutkinta toki asian voisi näyttöä esille tuodakin. Onko fiwikipedia tai wikimedia tehnyt rikosilmoituksen asiassa? Sellaista ei taida nimimerkillä kuviansa jättäneet voida Suomessa nimimerkin murtumatta jättää, mutta ilmiannon kyllä kai voi tällöinkin tehdä (nettipoliisille?)... Kovasti haluaisin tiedon siitä, että lainrikkojat on saatu ruotuun, he ovat korjanneet virheensä! Hesarin rike/ rikollinen teko Commonsin sääntöjä, sinne kuvia laittaneiden tekijänoikeuksia (tekijänoikeuslakia) ja hyvää lehtimiestapaa vastaan näyttää ilmeiseltä. Tässä tilanteessa aiheutuu haittaa myös siitä, ettei suuren mediatalon härskin, ilmeisen laittoman käytöksen takia nyt enää/toistaiseksi uskalla tai tohdi laittaa viime vuoden elokuun jälkeen ja etenkin keväällä/kesällä systemaattisemmin kerättyjä valokuvia massatalletuksena Commonsiin edes harrastamallani karsitulla resoluutiolla. Ensin tuo rikollinen pitää saada kuriin, sitten luottamus toivottavasti palautuu. Tämä oli (puutteellisesti toimivan botin ohella) ehkä keskeisin syy sille, että vetäydyin fiwikin Elokuun kuvituskisasta 2014 äskettäin pois. Viime vuonnahan (2013) "voitin" tuon skaban. Nyt valmiina oli vajaa 300 muokattua (rajaus, resoluutio, nimeäminen, mahd. horisontin kierto kohdalleen yms., alustava kuvateksti engl/suomeksi) jpg-kuvaa Suomesta ja ulkomailta. Ja oli valmius/ aikomus/ suunnitelmaakin tutustua lähialueiden/kulttuuri/yhteiskunta/asuinalueisiin/yrityksiin/ilmiöihin +50-70 km säteellä kolmesta "tukikohdasta" lähtien vielä tämän elokuunkin aikana kameran kanssa. Sukulointi/työmatkat siihen päälle. (Pidän Hesarin käytöksen takia myös suunniteltua GLAM-yhteistyötä nyt harmaalle alueelle joutuneena; ainakin tälläinen esimerkki tekijänoikeuksien rikkomisesta täytyy selkeästi tuoda esille ja kertoa hyvistä käytännöistä/esimerkeistä rikkureiden palauttamiseksi.) --Paju (talk) 14:26, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Täytyypä tutkia asiaa fi-wikin puolella kuhan ehtii. Tekijänoikeuskahvihuoneesta pitäisi löytää oikeaan paikkaan, jossa selostettu toimenpiteitä. -Kuvien tekijä voi tehtä rikosilmoituksen tekijänoikeusrikkomuksesta, se otetaan vastaan, mutta saat paluupostissa ilmoituksen tutkinnan lopettamisesta, koska rikoksesta on seurauksena korkeintaan sakkoja. Hesarin jutun laatinut toimittaja on nyt vuosilomalla syyskuun alkuun. -Htm (talk) 07:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your picture of Marioff Vantaa office

[edit]

Would you be able to delete the Marioff Vantaa 4.jpg? The company has moved in the beginning of 2014. Thank you.

I edited the file description. No need to delete photo. ---Htm (talk) 14:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vauvan hammasharja ja -tahna.jpg

[edit]
File:Vauvan hammasharja ja -tahna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

🎂CAKE🎂 11:52, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I did not notice this discussion in time to react. E.g. the user of the toothbrush in the picture kept me occupied. --Paju (talk) 04:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки», 7 березня — 5 квітня 2015

[edit]

Вітаємо!

З 7 березня по 5 квітня 2015 року буде проходити конкурс статей «Вікіпедія любить пам'ятки» в україномовному розділі Вікіпедії. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки» / сторінка на сайті «Вікімедіа Україна»

File source is not properly indicated: File:Helsinki-districts-Rastila.png

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Helsinki-districts-Rastila.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Helsinki-districts-Rastila.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, 1989 19:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They all have been created/ partly redrawn by me (based on PD or CC chart), and should thus not be removed, even though Helsinki has changed it's borders. I'll try to update their classification / copyright data after this stupid suggestion/ discussion of "global user accounts", which approach clearly violates user privacy due to the autologin in case user is present online in one wiki, an the original single login approach (valid as I signed in in Commons), has been changed/ cancelled.

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Paju. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Paju~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:20, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

You are wrong! The user is the same Paju as in may other wikis. He/She he does not accept global accounts to be used in wikipedia, only local accounts. The global approach violates the original agreement which suggested single / local login. Moreover, and more seriosly, the current approach of autologin user in other wikis violates user privacy if he/she just looks for an article or photos but does not edit any part of it. Such a visits shall always be anonymous, unless user specifically agrees or wishes identification who reads the article or looks the photo. Active users with Username should not have any weaker privacy than anonymous ones! No tracking nor autologin is needed unless pictures are uploaded/ data is updated!


File:BLR Minsk metro station 1.jpg

[edit]
File:BLR Minsk metro station 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

217.21.43.64 09:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bobruisk city statue1a BY.jpg

[edit]
File:Bobruisk city statue1a BY.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

195.50.31.213 07:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:Bobrujsk market hall front in winter BY.jpg

[edit]
File:Bobrujsk market hall front in winter BY.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

195.50.31.213 07:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed

[edit]

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

04:44, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

File:BY Vitebsk Marko factory.jpg

[edit]
File:BY Vitebsk Marko factory.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

37.17.112.158 23:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 08:06, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding English and Swedish to files?

[edit]

Hi! Is it ok if you add English and Swedish to File:Ratapihantie 9 ovet - Pasila - Helsinki - m.jpg? Also do you want to make the Swedish at File:Ratapihantie 9 - Pasila - Helsinki - m.jpg the same as the Finnish and English? WhisperToMe (talk) 19:11, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vuoden Kokki -kilpailun logo.jpg

[edit]

Hi, please don't add Category:Copyright violations manually. Use 'report copyright violation' from the left menu instead. Jcb (talk) 23:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no Category:Copyright violations edits directly. But adding class or {{copyvio|https://www.flickr.com/photos/elosaatio/24435100004/in/album-72157665846651152/}} with link stating NC status of the source file is clearly one compact way to report violation. If you are not happy with that, please DO NOT remove such a statement of unlegal status of the file UNLESS you add same statement of copyright violation statement elsewhere! --Paju~commonswiki (talk) 23:47, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A good reason to use standard procedures from the tools menu is that it will help you to follow the process properly. It's e.g. mandatory to inform the uploader if you nominate a file for deletion. The scripts from the tools menu will do that for you, but in none of your manual nominations you did that. Please don't use templates like {{Copyvio}} in the nomination reason. If you use the 'report copyright violation' link (which you did not), the script will add the copyvio template to the file description page. Jcb (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cropping images

[edit]

By way of information for the future, when you want to crop an image, as you did with File:National Museum and National Library of Chad in N'Djamena - 2014-10-01 a.jpg. I suggest you use the CropTool that can be activated in your commons Preferences, under Gadgets. The CropTool will then appears in the left side of your screen. It saves everyone a lot of time because it transfers all the correct and appropriate information into the cropped image, such as source, license, author, etc. It even leaves a backlink to the original and visa versa so long as the original has been positively reviewed. That way all the proper information is there and does not need to be manually reviewed. If you are just cropping a small bit of the image like a frame you can decide to overwrite the original image but for more major crops you should upload the cropped version as a separate new image, as you did, but you have a choice. I hope you can see how everyone can save time and frustration by using CropTool. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 18:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Wiki Loves Monuments finalists selected

[edit]
  • Kansalliskirjaston eteläsali Valokuva: Marit Henriksson
    Kansalliskirjaston eteläsali
    Valokuva: Marit Henriksson
  • Helsingin tuomiokirkko Valokuva: Julie Tsarfati
    Helsingin tuomiokirkko
    Valokuva: Julie Tsarfati
  • Herttoniemen kartano Valokuva: Edwardina von Boxis
    Herttoniemen kartano
    Valokuva: Edwardina von Boxis
  • Hossan värikallion kalliomaalaus Valokuva: Eerik Lehto
    Hossan värikallion kalliomaalaus
    Valokuva: Eerik Lehto
  • Petäjäveden vanha kirkko talvipäivänä Valokuva: Maarit Siitonen
    Petäjäveden vanha kirkko talvipäivänä
    Valokuva: Maarit Siitonen
  • Sunilan tehtaat ja asuinalue. "Maailman kaunein tehdasrakennus" talvella kuvattuna Kymijoen Huumanhaaran yli. Valokuva: Janiwiki0
    Sunilan tehtaat ja asuinalue. "Maailman kaunein tehdasrakennus" talvella kuvattuna Kymijoen Huumanhaaran yli.
    Valokuva: Janiwiki0
  • Tampereen tuomiokirkon katto Valokuva: Old Pionear
    Tampereen tuomiokirkon katto
    Valokuva: Old Pionear
  • Särestöniemen erämaatila ja ateljee, maatilan sauna Valokuva: Hti-358
    Särestöniemen erämaatila ja ateljee, maatilan sauna
    Valokuva: Hti-358
  • Tönnönkosken silta ja myllypaikka Valokuva: Pia Simonen
    Tönnönkosken silta ja myllypaikka
    Valokuva: Pia Simonen
  • Vaajakosken vanha vesivoimalaitos Valokuva: Teuvo Salmenjoki
    Vaajakosken vanha vesivoimalaitos
    Valokuva: Teuvo Salmenjoki
Finalistit / Finalists
Kiitos osallistumisesta Wiki Loves Monuments -valokuvauskilpailuun!

Suomen kilpailuun lähetettiin yhteensä 3464 kuvaa 98 kuvaajalta. Näistä valittiin 10 valokuvaa kansainvälisen kansainväliseen finaaliin. Tuomaristoon kuuluivat valokuvataiteilija Mojo Erämetsä, graafikko Tommi Kovala, rehtori Riitta Moisander, vierailijaprofessori Elina Paasonen, valokuvaaja Jussi Tiainen ja valokuvaaja Soile Tirilä.

Suomen kilpailusarjan voittaja julkistetaan palkintojenjakotilaisuudessa Kansallismuseon Ateljeessa Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 18.11.2018 klo 13.00. Tervetuloa!

Suomen WLM-tiimin puolesta,

Thank you for participating Wiki Loves Monuments photography contest!

Altogether 3464 images from 98 photographers participated in the Finnish competition. 10 photos were chosen for the international final. The jury members were photography artist Mojo Erämetsä, graphic designer Tommi Kovala, rector Riitta Moisander, visiting professor Elina Paasonen, photographer Jussi Tiainen and photographer Soile Tirilä.

The winner of the Finnish competition will be announced at the award ceremony at the National Museum of Finland Atelier Mannerheimintie 34, Helsinki 18 November at 1.00 pm. Welcome!

On behalf of the Finnish WLM team,

Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) & Kimmo Virtanen (Zache) (talk) 13:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, during this participation my main purpose was to take documentary photos for wikipedia articles & organize the existing WLM material for 2-3 cities. I had not much time for taking artistically nice photos. Much work is left, e.g. next year one could have much larger palette of old photos available with locations to be snapped again. I did found several sources for (130-90 years) old photos but none of those where just 100 years old as was wished this year. My suggestion is to leave the WLM pages for Finland open for next year; allowing people to study the existing targets also before Sept. 2019. --Paju~commonswiki (talk) 19:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paju~commonswiki/Archive1&oldid=368890328"