User talk:Overberg~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hallo Overberg, da du ja geschrieben hattest, du hättest auch andere deiner Uploads zur Löschung markiert, habe ich einige Uploads durchgesehen und dabei entdeckt, dass du bei File:Lageplan Rengering.jpg und File:Bernard Neteler.jpg dich selbst als Urheber angegeben hast, sicherlich aus Irrtum. Durch treue Reproduktion eines existierenden Werks wird man nicht Urheber. Da beide Vorlagen aus derselben Quellen stammen, solltest du dort nochmal genau nachschauen (ggf. auch anderernorts) wer als Urheber angegeben ist; bei dem Plan möglicherweise ein Amt, bei dem Foto aber eine Person. Diese sollten im Eintrag Autor/Author angegeben werden. Wenn du auch bei gründlicher Recherche keinen Urheber findest, gehört dort {{Unknown}} hinein, was allerdings die Verwendbarkeit des Fotos auf :de einschränken könnte. Bei dem Foto sollte auch eine genauere Datierung erfolgen, da der Abgebildete ja erst 1912 gestorben ist. Erst dann können wir wissen, ob der derzeitige Lizenzbaustein PD-old-100 gerechtfertigt ist, weil der sich ja auf den Fotografen bezieht, nicht auf den Abgebildeten. Zusätzlich solltest du diesen Baustein {{PD-Art}} einsetzen, weil du ja eine Reproduktion aus dem Buch übernommen hast. --Túrelio (talk) 13:57, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Bei den 3 Karten File:Karte-TK25-Koenigsberg.pdf, File:Karte-KDR100-Koenigsberg.pdf und File:Karte-ME300-Koenigsberg.pdf bin ich mir etwas unsicher. Im Unterschied zu den USA sind Werke staatlicher Stellen in Deutschland nicht automatisch gemeinfrei. Die offiziellen Nutzungsbedingungen (http://www.bkg.bund.de/nn_184026/DE/Bundesamt/Downloads/Kostenlose-Karten/Kostenlose-Karten-Deutschland-Antarktis.html#[Anker-Deutschland]) klingen mir zwar ziemlich frei, aber zugleich etwas einschränkend wegen der "unentgeltlich-Klausel" und der fehlenden Erwähnung einer Bearbeitung. Ich würde dir empfehlen, das auf de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen zur Diskussion zu stellen, weil dort mehr Spezialisten zum dt. Urheberrecht mitlesen. Wenn du mit :de momentan ein Problem hast, kann ich das aber auch machen. --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ist OK, im Zweifelsfall, ich bin schon zu gut wie weg. --Overberg (talk) 14:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Meine Rückfrage auf WP:UF hat bestätigt, dass die Karten wohl nicht frei genug sind. Deshalb die 3 LAs. --Túrelio (talk) 12:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Karte-TK25-Koenigsberg.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karte-KDR100-Koenigsberg.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karte-ME300-Koenigsberg.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Für die 3 Karten laufen bereits LAs, wie du sehen konntest. Zusätzliche speedy sind sinnlos, zumal hier keine URVB vorliegt. Die Karten entsprechen lediglich nicht unseren Richtlinien, was nicht gleichbedeutend mit URV ist. --Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Stas1995 (talk) 12:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

22:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

04:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, AFBorchert (talk) 22:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joseph Picker steht Franz Guntermann Modell.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AFBorchert (talk) 22:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]