User talk:Olybrius/档案/2011年

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Toulouse par mois

[edit]

Bonjour Olybrius. Je ne vois pas vraiment l'intérêt de ranger des photos de bâtiments par mois de prise de vue. Mais je pense que tu n'es pas de mon avis. Je t'écris juste parce que je crois qu'il y aurait d'autres photos pour la Category:September 2010 in Toulouse vu qu'il y a les journées du patrimoine à ce moment de l'année. Ainsi, j'ai récemment ajouté des photos sur le Palais Niel qui était ouvert ce week-end-là, Category:Palais Niel. Bonne continuation Traumrune (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oui bon certes, bien que la lumière change selon les saisons, en l'occurrence sur les photos du Lycée Fermat, elle n'était pas très caractéristique. Mais je pense pas que ça fasse du mal d'être précis (eh, tu les avais bien mises les dates qm au départ ;p, t'as qu'à bidouiller les metadata et supprimer la date comme sur File:Palais-Niel_30.JPG où ya qu'un Z (?!), comme ça je pourrai plus sévir XD, l'ennui c'est que là, c'est un jardin et la date est plus importante).
En tout cas c'est plutôt un sujet à discuter à la pompe du village. - Olybrius (talk) 09:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Palais Niel

[edit]

Je sais même pas bien où il se trouve ce palais (je suis passé à la caserne Niel par contre, mais il en reste plus gd chose, je vais ptêt retourner ds le quartier qm, je voudrais photographier la mosquée d'Empalot). Comme c'est les journées du patrimoine, il faudrait aussi mettre ça dans Category:2010 events in Toulouse (ainsi que dans Category:European Heritage Days 2010. - Olybrius (talk) 09:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Toulouse_-_Affiche_au_Katénaire_-_20101216_(3).jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Toulouse_-_Affiche_au_Katénaire_-_20101216_(3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Toulouse_-_Affiche_au_Katénaire_-_20101216_(3).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yuval Y § Chat § 20:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disused vs Former station

[edit]

Hello Olybrius! Thank you by your advice; I didn't see any reason for two (apparent) concurrent categories. I should have looked better into it, and I wont'object any reversion. Yet, I don't grasp -yet- the concept. It seems to me that Disused train stations are no longer in use, but may have other uses, such as found in Category:Former train stations is closely related to Buildings which have once served as train stations, but now have another function. Could you help me by telling the difference (so I will be able to categorize correctly future disused o former stations)? Thanks a lot! Jordi Roqué (Discussió/Talk) 23:07, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dsl pour l'impolitesse

[edit]

Olybrius, je ne suis pas familier des usages sur WikiMedia, c'est ce qui explique ma "rétro-intervention" sur la signature de ma photo du Madres. Il faut admettre que le bazar wiki est un peu usine à gaz pour le néophyte. Et ajouter un lien vers la netiquette sur une page où l'hypertexte est... généralisé (y a pas un mot sans lien !) n'est peut-être pas ma solution. cc-by-sa : c'est bien la licence que je placerais (j'ajouterais NC mais c'est implicite, non ?) Je veux bien continuer à déposer quelques images parmi les dizaines de milliers dont je dispose, mais faudra être indulgent avec les "vieux cons" (idem si j'ai posté ce message là où il ne fallait pas). BU

Commons:Village pump#Categorization question

[edit]

Please see Commons:Village pump#Categorization question (about the Ballard Commons in Seattle and its relation to Category:Skateparks. - Jmabel ! talk 21:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cascade et waterfall

[edit]

Bonjour Olybrius.

Je laisse ta correction, bien que ce soit discutable, pour la raison suivante : vue la photo, il semble que ce ne soit pas une chute franche et que des paliers soient bien marqués (mais c'est plus une chute qu'un ruissellement). Car le mot "cascade" en anglais (donc ici sur Commons) a un sens plus restrictif qu'en français: c'est une chute d'eau par paliers, et sans ("trop de") chute libre. Ainsi de nombreuses chutes d'eaux appelées "cascades" en français rentrent plutôt dans la catégorie "waterfalls", d'où mes modifs d'hier. C'est piégeant... Et ici effectivement l'overcat m'avait échappé. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bien d'accord que c'est une question d'interprétation assez délicate. Mais là je vois qm assez bien que la chute n'est pas verticale et qu'il y a des degrés, certes masqués par le débit important (fin août c'est étonnant) et les arbres. Alors, comme y avait overcat et qu'il fallait corriger j'ai privilégié mon interpréation. Fait chier la nature, faudrait qu'elle songe à passer son diplôme de paysagiste et arrêter d'embrouiller nos tentatives classificatrices. - Olybrius (talk) 08:37, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronismes

[edit]

Donc, toi ça te gène. Je crois que j'aurais peut-être dû initier une discussion à ce sujet. Pasque j'en ai créé des tonnes. Des trucs comme Midi-Pyrénées au IIe siècle ça ne me dérange absolument pas. Mais il y a des gens plus tatillons. As-tu connaissance de discussions/règles à ce sujet. Que je m'y colle sinon. Pasque mes modèles {{Centuries in Haute-Garonne}}, {{Centuries in Midi-Pyrénées}} risquent d'être hors-la-loi. Mais moi je me vois pas me lancer dans les {{Centuries in Guyenne}}, {{Centuries in Novempopulania}}, etc. Encore que si des savants veulent les rajouter en plus... - Olybrius (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

En fait, oui, ça me paraît anachronique; les départements sont bien plus anciens que les régions (qui sont encore moins immuables, et qui n'existent que depuis 1960 en gros, et n'ont, pour certaines régions comme Poitou-Charentes par exemple qu'un faible sentiment identitaire, quant au passé alors...); par exemple, pour les naissances (sur wiki fr), on distingue Naissance en Angoumois (pour avant 1789) et Naissance en Charente (après 1789). Et honnêtement ton entreprise me paraît bizarre et énorme que de croiser les mois, les années et les lieux. Il faudrait que tu catégorises ainsi les images de chaque département, voire de tout Commons, et il y en a des tonnes. Peut-être en effet on pourrait partir d'une discussion, je pensais que tu ne créais pas à l'aveuglette. Je te conseille de ne pas laisser de lien rouge, dès que tu en crées, car il risque d'y en avoir beaucoup (leur durée de vie doit être limitée). Cdlt, Jack ma (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rouffiac-Tolosan_-_E.Leclerc_-_20110407_(2).jpg

[edit]
File:Rouffiac-Tolosan_-_E.Leclerc_-_20110407_(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 23:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bots for the job

[edit]

Hello, for your dating-categories job you may try asking a bot for the job, that could be very timesaving. 7 M files.... --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toulouse_-_Canal_de_Brienne_-_20110130_(1).jpg

[edit]
File:Toulouse_-_Canal_de_Brienne_-_20110130_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Léna (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toulouse_-_Allée_du_Père_René_de_naurois_1.jpg

[edit]
File:Toulouse_-_Allée_du_Père_René_de_naurois_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Léna (talk) 19:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toulouse_-_Rue_des_Mouettes_-20110414_(1).jpg

[edit]
File:Toulouse_-_Rue_des_Mouettes_-20110414_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Civa (talk) 14:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photos de Haute-Garonne

[edit]

Bonjour Olybrius. Je te remercie pour la distinction mais ça manque de traduction. Peux-tu me dire ce que signifient « barnstar » et « tireless » ? Merci d'avance. Père Igor (talk) 14:37, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah voui pardon, j'avais pas fait attention. tireless ça veut dire infatigable, quant à barnstar, euh ben, aucune idée, j'ai jamais eu la curiosité de chercher la traduction. C'est donc le moment de le faire : Bon ben c'est comme son nom l'indique, une étoile de grange, une décoration que l'on mettait à l'origine sur les granges aux Etats-Unis (c'est d'origine germanique dit l'article, mais apparemment inutilisé (ou tombé en désuétude ?) en Europe). Eh ça devrait te plaire, toi qui aime les détails architecturaux. Bref, sur Wikimédia c'est une sorte de médaille. - Olybrius (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, merci. C'est vrai que j'engrange un maximum de photos par monument. Le plus long, c'est ensuite de les traiter et de les verser sur Commons, et de les insérer dans les articles, et de créer les articles correspondant aux monuments, etc. Père Igor (talk) 20:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Toulouse - Affiche Avenue de Lombez - 2011012 (2).jpg

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Toulouse - Affiche Avenue de Lombez - 2011012 (2).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toulouse - Affiche au Katénaire - 20101216 (3).jpg

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Toulouse - Affiche au Katénaire - 20101216 (3).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toulouse - Affiche Avenue de Lombez - 20110112 (1).jpg

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Toulouse - Affiche Avenue de Lombez - 20110112 (1).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toulouse - Affiche au Katénaire - 20101216 (2).jpg

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Toulouse - Affiche au Katénaire - 20101216 (2).jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sens du mot anglais "derelict"

[edit]

Je ne connais pas la signification du mot derelict, d'après ce que j'ai compris, le sens est abandonné? (On devrait se résoudre de mettre un texte avec une explication dans des catégories comme celle-ci :() Si le sens est vraiment abandonné l'hôtel Delpech File:HotelDelpech 01.JPG n'est pas concerné. C'est une copropriété et il semble qu'ils n'ont pas l'argent pour réparer. En tout cas, il y a un tas de boites aux lettres dans la cour. Amicalement Traumrune (talk) 22:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Derelict" veut simplement dire délabré. La définition est donnée à la catégorie racine Category:Derelict_buildings. Donc à réserver à des bâtiments encore en usage. Bonne continuation. - Olybrius (talk) 10:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merci, Traumrune (talk) 23:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

Hi Olybrius - the purpose of categories is to make finding images easy. If the images are split up between dozens or hundreds of small categories each containing just 4 or 5 images, finding images becomes tedious and complex. By all means create new subcategories when a category is full (200 images), but when it just contains 20 or 30 images, further subdivision is counter-productive and unhelpful to users visiting Commons from the various language wikipedias.

Also some of your subcategories have been badly named (one fruit, two fruit, not 'fruits'; and what does 'spontaneous' mean?). Subdividing botanical entities by political subdivisions is also not useful; plants don't follow political boundaries, only ecological and biogeographical ones. In particular, it is most valuable to retain images of a species in its native habitat on the main species category, not pushed down into any subcategories (of the ones you have made, the "Xxxx (cultivated)" subcategories are the most useful).

Hope this helps! - MPF (talk) 20:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Olybrius/档案/2011年&oldid=73876763"