User talk:Oluwa2Chainz
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Oluwa2Chainz (talk) 16:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, I'm glad you understand Wikipedia's policies on uploading images, but this is not Wikipedia. Wikipedia allows fair use images, Wikimedia commons only permits freely licensed files. Can you give me an example of a file or two that you'd like to upload thats free? ~riley (talk) 18:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- Note that Oluwa2Chainz has been using a sockpuppet, KingWire while blocked. This issue should be addressed before unblocking. Эlcobbola talk 18:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Elcobbola: so cos I had a sock case implies that I can no longer request for an unblock? I give up! And you should note that I have nothing related to Coal Press or whatever. You can run a check user. Oluwa2Chainz (talk) 20:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- No, it does not imply that.
- Your accounts have been blocked for both copyright violations and sockpuppetry.
- COM:BLOCK requires articulation of an understanding of the issue(s) for which you were blocked and a credible commitment to discontinue.
- Taken together, the foregoing requires your unblock request to address both copyright violations and sockpuppetry.
- Your requests here, however, have sought only to address copyright violations and, for the reasons provided, have not been credible--a required threshold.
- You have thus repeatedly failed to address credibly the first issue and failed to address entirely the second issue.
- Accordingly, I advised you that "repeated posting of unblock requests that do not address the issue(s)" may result in the removal of the ability to edit the talk page. Nowhere have I said or implied "cos [you] had a sock case implies that [you] can no longer request for an unblock." Please read critically.
- I will reiterate that your sockpuppetry is Confirmed, and indeed should be obvious even without CU rights by comparing the edits of, for example, Oluwa2Chainz and KingWire (e.g. w:Young Scrap, w:Saheed Osupa, w:Fifi Cooper, w:DJ Tab, etc.) Эlcobbola talk 21:57, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- No, it does not imply that.