User talk:Olnnu
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
--SieBot 20:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Catechisme Peuple.jpg was uncategorized on 23 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:DeFuisseaux 1843-1901.jpg was uncategorized on 23 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Francois de Tassis 000.jpg was uncategorized on 30 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:François de-Tassis.jpg was uncategorized on 30 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Monuments 14-18 Maissin (2011).jpg was uncategorized on 19 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Plaques hommage Pécrot .jpg was uncategorized on 19 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Cimetière militaire franco-allemand Maissin 2011 b.jpg was uncategorized on 19 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Institut Saint Stanislas Bruxelles Nerviens 115.jpg was uncategorized on 5 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Heures de Notre Dame ou Hennessy Mars.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Heures de Notre Dame ouHennessy Juin.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 15:13, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tour St Barthélemy 2011 i.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tour St Barthélemy 2011 f.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tour St Barthélemy 2011 h.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tour St Barthélemy 2011 j.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tour St Barthélemy 2011 g.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Olnnu (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)User : All Tour de Saint Barthelemy pic categorized as of Sept 4th 2001
- Image:Tour St Barthelemy Bousval chapelle6.jpg.jpg was uncategorized on 7 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tour St Barthelemy Bousval chapelle4.jpg.jpg was uncategorized on 7 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Tour St Barthelemy Bousval chapelle5.jpg.jpg was uncategorized on 7 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Logo Softeurop.jpg was uncategorized on 30 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 01:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Guy_Corneau_2011.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Guy_Corneau_2011.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Guy_Corneau_2011.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
99of9 (talk) 10:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
I provided the authorization by email and it was not considered. What else can i do then ?
Permission
[edit]Permission was sent to Wiki commons by e-mail. No reaction so far. user Olnnu
File:Andre_WATERKEYN.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.155.241 10:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
19:54, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[user:Olnnu] I can provide full licence given by the copyright holder. What is the recipient adress ?
File:Vol AF447 Rio-Paris.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Denniss (talk) 23:46, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Post-it war in Brussels.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 21:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
File:College St Michel groupe 1947.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Robert Weemeyer (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Tout à fait d'accord. Et sans hésitation. Cette date m'a échappé. merci de votre vigilance. Olnnu (talk) 12:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
File:WauxHall Nivelles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
81.244.97.168 08:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
File:College St Michel cour internes 1928.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 21:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
File:College St Michel Tennis 1926.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 21:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Hi Olnnu, did you ever forward the permission by Patrick Waterkeyn for this image to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org), as had been suggested 3 years ago (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Andre WATERKEYN.jpg)? --Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
I can not remember what happened at the time. I believe yes. The pity is that although the picture was provided by and authorized legal heir to Mr Andre Waterkeyn someone found necessary to reformat the picture and suppress half of the Atomium! Very sorry, as it was (for once) a fully rights-free pic of that well know monument. I can possibly locate the 3 years old authorization or get a new one. In that case I request the pic to be published in full. Pls tell if it is still missing. Olnnu (talk) 08:09, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- I cannot tell, as I am an admin, but not an OTRS member. You should ask about that at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard, as you can give them some key information to ease the search. In order to show also the Atomium in full, 2 independant permissions are required: 1) permission by the author of the photo and 2) permission by the copyright-holder of the Atomium. Maybe the image was "reformatted" (cropped), because there was no overt evidence of a permission, as it is still now. --Túrelio (talk) 10:38, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
moved from my talkpage to here
[edit]Once on Commons, I came across an image that was under a license granted to pictures "first published in the E-U anonymously and over X years old". I'like to find the right license title for that type of images. Can you help me ? Thanks. Olnnu (talk) 08:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- You are probably referring to {{Anonymous-EU}}. Its use requires evidence for an anonymous publication at least 70 years ago. Still, some Wikimedia projects do not allow use of such media. --Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
I'm very sorry, but the roof extension of the opera is under copyright. Yours sincerely, --M0tty (talk) 15:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hope you are satisfied with the new version of the picture. Olnnu (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
File:Oeuvre Max Van der Linden Ottignies TOTAL.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 18:09, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Karel Ledeganck portrait.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Karel Ledeganck portrait.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:32, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Karel Ledeganck portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
JuTa 20:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Epigraphe de Lin-Piao à l édition Pensées de Mao 1966 ed. française.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
shizhao (talk) 07:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
image restored
[edit]Hi Olnnu, I have restored File:WauxHall Nivelles.jpg, as Belgium recently enacted FOP exception. --Túrelio (talk) 21:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
File:Francoise Sironi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sandek33 (talk) 13:03, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Francoise Sironi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sandek33 (talk) 13:04, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Re: your mail
[edit]Edit the EXIF data localy on your computer, reload a new version of the file(s) and request deletion of the old version. But these files are not your own work as you claimed. You didnt took them yourself. You did it? This person has to confirm that he/she is willing to publish the files under a free license of his choice by sending an email to the commons support team. For details see Commons:OTRS. PS: I would prefer if you could contact me on my talk page in future. regards --JuTa 09:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but I start not realy to trust you when you lying to me in first place. How I (we) can be sure you now telling the truth, or lying again to prevent the deletion of the files? Better you confirm your authorship the Commons:OTRS. PS: Again, Please dont contact me through mail in future but talk to me on my talk page. --JuTa 10:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Chateau Neufbois conciergerie 01.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Chateau Neufbois conciergerie 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
JuTa 09:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Chateau Neufbois conciergerie 02.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Chateau Neufbois conciergerie 02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
JuTa 09:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Chassipress (talk) 14:54, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Ebola Monrovia 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Ebola Monrovia 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Ebola Monrovia 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Logo St Stan le 115.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|