User talk:OleNeitzel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, OleNeitzel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 22:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 191003 Jesus-Boot Bibelzentrum Schleswig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:17, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 191009 Bach Godel bei Witsum mit Blickrichtung Nordwest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 191009 Bach Godel bei Witsum mit Blickrichtung Südost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but IMO too much uninteresting sky --Michielverbeek 19:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Plenarsaal mit Rednerpult und Regierungsbank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 08:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Plenarsaal Sitze Reichstags-blue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Eisenbahnbrücke über Sachsendamm und A100 am Bahnhof Südkreuz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carschten 19:25, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Sowjetische Graffiti Reichstagsgebäude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tomer T 08:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Kyrillische Graffiti Reichstag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tomer T 08:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Kyrillische Graffiti Reichstagsgebäude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tomer T 08:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Bundestagspräsidium und Regierungsbank im Plenarsaal des Reichstagsgebäudes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not perfect but good enough. --Tomer T 08:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

File:190930 Blick auf die Kuppel aus dem Plenarsaal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Blick auf die Kuppel aus dem Plenarsaal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Schuppenartige Verglasung der Kuppel auf dem Reichstagsgebäude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Turm des Reichstagsgebäudes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tomer T 08:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190930 Sockel des Lichtumlenkelements.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 190902 Foyer im von Ieoh Ming Pei gestalteten Ausstellungsbau des DHM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Nice --Podzemnik 16:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:190930 Zeit und Leben von Bernhard Heisig in der Bestandsbibliothek des Reichstagsgebäudes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 04:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 17:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]