User talk:Okami-san/Archive 1
Please do not edit!
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Please link images
[edit]
Hello Okami-san/Archive 1!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.
To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.
You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.
The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!
Thank you. BotMultichill (talk) 12:57, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Rodener Notkirche.jpg is uncategorized since 22 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:NeusteRodenerKirche.jpg is uncategorized since 22 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:AlteundneueKIrcheRoden.jpg is uncategorized since 22 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:NeueKircheinSaarlouisRoden.jpg is uncategorized since 22 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Bruecke ueber den Ellbach.jpg is uncategorized since 22 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:RodenerGebaeude.jpg is uncategorized since 22 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:18, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Image:AuszeichnungHandwerkMarkusEckhard2009.jpg is uncategorized since 14 April 2009.
- Image:MarkusEckhardSaarland.jpg is uncategorized since 14 April 2009.
- Image:Mujodogane Muenchen.jpg is uncategorized since 15 April 2009.
File source is not properly indicated: File:Mujodogane_Muenchen.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mujodogane_Muenchen.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Eusebius (talk) 11:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I've tagged this picture as missing a source because it is of small size and missing the EXIF data generated by any camera, phone, scanner... It is usually what we get when somebody has grabs a picture on the web uploads it here. 95% of the time, it is a copyright violation. I'm ready to believe that you've taken this picture yourself, but would you be able to upload a larger version, or to explain what happened to the picture? I'm sorry if you have been offended but I'm sure you understand. --Eusebius (talk) 15:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
File tagging File:Donnerbraeu_SLS2.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Donnerbraeu_SLS2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Donnerbraeu_SLS2.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Trixt (talk) 12:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Donnerbraeu_SLS3.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Donnerbraeu_SLS3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Trixt (talk) 12:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:Donnerbraeu_SLS1.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Donnerbraeu_SLS1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Trixt (talk) 12:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
File tagging File:SchlossBrauereiNeunkirchen3.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:SchlossBrauereiNeunkirchen3.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SchlossBrauereiNeunkirchen3.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Trixt (talk) 12:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I'm a de-0 user. Could you please translate it in English? Thank you--Trixt (talk) 13:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe that it is ok. Please remove "no permssion" tag if you had the permission. Thank you--Trixt (talk) 13:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, and dont' use "own work" in Source field! Also, use {{Self}} with "|author=" parameter (you are not the copyright holder) and with CC-BY-SA-3.0 only. Thank you--Trixt (talk) 13:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Mmmh, I'm sorry, but I'm still in doubt. I think that the terms of use of that web site aren't so clear, and I don't know if the website is the copyright holder of the photos. Could you please ask a to some active Deutsch language admins, like ChrisiPK, Martin H. or Túrelio? Thank you--Trixt (talk) 17:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okami-san, a scan doesn't make you the author of an 2-dimensional work. I've therefore corrected the entries for author and date. Was there no information avaiable about the real date of this photo? --Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- saarlouiser neger (donnerbraeu file 3) - i am the owner of the adpaper and the scanmaker :-) donner 1+2: 1902/1921 (set this info the the description fields. I thought i have to write 8/1/2010 cause i modified the picutures. And sorry for my bad English.--Okami-san (talk) 11:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Wenn dir deutsch leichter fällt, kein Problem. Bei den 3 Donnerbräu-Fotos sollte noch der Name des ursprünglichen Urhebers eingetragen werden. --Túrelio (talk) 18:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Gott sei Dank :-)))) Also das Photo mit dem Neger ist von mir selbst vom Original-Etikett gemacht. Da muss dann ja wohl nichts rein? Die beiden anderen schreibe ich dann jetzt gleich rein. Danke --Okami-san (talk) 22:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Mmmh, I'm sorry, but I'm still in doubt. I think that the terms of use of that web site aren't so clear, and I don't know if the website is the copyright holder of the photos. Could you please ask a to some active Deutsch language admins, like ChrisiPK, Martin H. or Túrelio? Thank you--Trixt (talk) 17:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Aktienbrauerei_Saarlouis_1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 11:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Saarlouiser_Neger_Bier_Etikett.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eusebius (talk) 11:35, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Derivative work
[edit]When you take a photograph of a copyrighted document, you do not become the (sole) copyright holder. The creator of the original document also has rights over your picture, which therefore may not be free. Please read COM:DW for further information. --Eusebius (talk) 11:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)