User talk:Noehtahir
File tagging File:Splinter Partij.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Splinter Partij.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Splinter Partij.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Vera (talk) 09:56, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Cornelia Boonstra-van der Bijl.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Vera (talk) 10:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Nieuwe voorzitter 2021.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Vera (talk) 10:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
File:TK Samenstelling 1971.jpg
[edit]Op dit plaatje wordt als vierde partij genoemd APR. Dit moet echter ARP zijn, het stond voor Anti Revolutionaire Partij, later met KVP en CHU samengesmolten tot het huidige CDA. N.B. ik heb soortgelijke plaatjes van andere jaren niet gecheckt, mogelijk bevatten die dezelfde fout.
Met vriendelijke groeten, Jeroen van den Broek 86.81.7.114 20:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hoi, ditzelfde wou ik ook opmerken, maar dit item bestond dus al. Volgens mij bevat alleen File:TK 1972 Samenstelling.jpg deze zelfde verschrijving. Groet, Apdency (talk) 15:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Ik ga het naar ARP veranderen, het is een slordigheids foutje. Mvg Noehtahir (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Mooi, dank! Die andere die ik noemde, File:TK 1972 Samenstelling.jpg noemt nog wel "APR". Groet, Apdency (talk) 20:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
hello,
Where did you source this file because I Have a Hard time finding it?
Wvdp (talk) 09:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked
[edit]Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Kabinet Rutte-IV (cropped).jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kabinet Rutte-IV (cropped).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Kabinet Rutte-IV (cropped).jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Rots61 (talk) 19:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/84/Holy_SURP_Hovhannes_Church.jpg/220px-Holy_SURP_Hovhannes_Church.jpg)
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
File:MarjoleinFaber.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dajasj (talk) 15:28, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:EddyvanHijum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dajasj (talk) 15:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Jong Sociaal Contract.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |