User talk:Nino Verde/Archives/2024/August

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Rtanj Mountain 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 15:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial view from Rtanj 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerial view from Rtanj 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from path to Rtanj peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Rtanj Mountain 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice image. Did you need to crop in here significantly? --Augustgeyler 09:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Yep. It is 24mm and if i go a bit back there will be lot of visual trash in foreground. --Nino Verde 09:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
 Support It is QI. But I would suggest less intence cropping and instead getting closer or changing lenses. --Augustgeyler 09:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from path to Rtanj peak 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 00:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from path to Rtanj peak 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 16:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from path to Rtanj peak 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Very nice composition. --Augustgeyler 19:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from path to Rtanj peak 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 21:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morning view of Mount Kinabalu in Malaysia, with its peak clearly visible.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mickaël en résidence 13:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Church of Saint Sava in Belgrade, reflected in water beneath cloudy skies..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 17:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Church of Saint Sava in Belgrade, reflected in water beneath cloudy skies. 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The detail level is a bit on the low side, but I think it's just enough for a mobile phone shot. --Peulle 10:31, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)