User talk:Nicola/Archive

Tipps für Newbies

Hallo Nicola54, falls Du die Zeit hast, auf Commons:Village pump#Overwriting a low-res picture (betr. AR-Porträt) mitzureden, bitte ich Dich darum. Es passierte soeben genau, was ich schwer aushalte: Geschwafel. Vor allem: Es würde die sinnvolle Handhabung dieses Deines Upoads erheblich vereinfachen, wenn Du die Lizenz auf "GFDL" ändern würdest. Das ist WP-Juristerei, aber vermutlich kaum umgehbar. lg, Wolfgang WeHaWoe 18:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DORT kommt eh' nix mehr raus (Klartext: "keine Sau interessiert's", wie man südlich des Weißwurstäquators zu sagen pflegt). Ich bitte Dich, Dein Bild selber über das von mir angefertigte Provisorium "drüberzuschreiben" -- dafür wurde es ja schließlich ebenfalls als PNG konzipiert.

Das geht so: Du öffnest Image:Albert Richter (1912-1940).png, klickst weit unten auf "Eine neue Version dieser Datei hochladen", gibst in die Felder "Textfeld" und "Lizenz" GARNICHTS ein, (änderst natürlich auch nicht den Dateinamen der COMMONS-Zieldatei) und bestätigst die COM-Rückmeldung, dass Du die alte Version überschreiben willst. Hinterher änderst Du auf der dann angezeigten Seite durch "bearbeiten" (edit), was Du geändert haben willst (also wohl den Namen des Fotografen, vielleicht auch die Lizenz -- dies ist offenbar zulässig). Wenn ICH das mache, wird's um einiges umständlicher, sobald der erste vielleicht nachfragt (weil ich Dich + Deine Erlaubnis dann zitieren muss, und witzloser Schriftverkehr entsteht, etc., blabla...).

Grund des Aufwands ist, dass nicht alle WP-Nutzungen des genannten älteren Schmalspurbildes zwingend angezeigt werden. (bes. Asien). Daher wäre es besser, das erst unlängst hochgeladene Bild (das ohnedies nicht sonderlich gut benannt ist) ehebaldigst wieder verschwinden zu lassen (wird ja bloß in deWP genutzt) und stattdessen die "neue Version" (also Deinen Überschreib-Upload, =die selbe Datei) des seit Längerem bestehenden zu belassen. Um den Rest kümmere ich mich schon. Kostet Dich meiner Schätzung nach maximal zwei-drei Minuten, falls Du eine ebenso langsame Verbindung wie ich haben solltest. lg, WeHaWoe 08:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Geduld war noch nie meine Stärke ;) : Hab's jetzt selber gemacht, bitte checke die Beschreibung. Das Duplikat sollte schnellsten verschwinden, in der deWP ersetze ich es jetzt gleich, damit der Löschantrag durchgeht. Gruß, Wolfgang

Auch das ging vorbei: "Village pump#Please de-link 'Image:Albert Richter Grabstein.png'" -- wir sind jetzt "müllfrei!" -- auf Deiner deWP Seite machte ich dazu noch 'ne Kurznotiz ;) lg, WeHaWoe 11:48, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Der Vollständigkeit halber weise ich Dich auf User talk:Ra'ike#Deine "Korrektur" der Beschreibung von Image:Albert Richter Grabstein.png hin ;) -- bloß nicht ankommen ;) WeHaWoe 05:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Sichter"-Berechtigung auf deWP?

Andere Frage: Hast Du auf deWP eine "Sichter"-Berechtigung? (Hängt mit der Anzahl bisheriger Edits zusammen.) Die Idee, Artikel per Sichtung für Neueinsteiger "etwas schwerer zugänglich" zu machen, ist an sich großartig, weil sie Adminds die Arbeit mit pubertierenden "Scherzkeksen" weitestgehend abnimmt. Blöd wär's nur, wenn ich einen großteils von Dir geschriebenen Artikel als "gesichtet" markiere und demgemäß Deine späteren Änderungen vorläufig "unterdrückt" würden. WeHaWoe 08:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disku zu Bildbeschreibungen

Commons:Village_pump#Original_date_and_context_needed... äußert sich dzt. dazu... WeHaWoe 15:45, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Nicola!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Omnisport Apeldoorn inside.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Björn Glasner Porträt.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Marcel Barth.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Shane Perkins.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Marianne Vos.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Stefan Nimke mit Gold 2011.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Larissa Kleinmann.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ralf Matzka Porträt.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Naranjo de Bulnes.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Peter Pieters.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Edward Dawkins.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kevin Sireau.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Robert Slippens.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Adam Stewart.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Scott Sunderland Track.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ethan Mitchell 2010.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:300px-Alexei Michailowitsch Markow.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Stefan Bötticher.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lisandra Guerra 2011.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Damian Zielinski.jpg was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Joachim Eilers2.JPG was uncategorized on 30 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Juan Llaneras.jpg was uncategorized on 3 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisa Brennauer.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Umbenennen

Hallo Nicola, ich habe Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#File:Italienischer_Vierer.jpg gesehen. Bitte verwende für solche Anfragen eine Vorlage. Siehe Commons:Dateien verschieben. Wenn jeder Umbenennungen so anfragen würde, dann wär es auf der Adminanfragenseite ganz schön voll. ;-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 18:51, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dann sollten die das nicht so gut verstecken :) --Nicola (talk) 18:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC) Kannst Du Dir vielleicht mal ein paar meiner Dateien anschauen, ob ich die jetzt richtig lizensiert habe? nur so stichprobenartig, danke. --Nicola (talk) 18:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hatte aber schon jemand verschoben. Wieso ich da "italienisch" schreibe, wenn da dick "France" auf deren Trikots steht, ist mir auch ein Rätsel :) --Nicola (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Die Lisa eins obendrüber habe ich schon angeschaut - hast du exakt richtig gemacht. Ich habe nur noch ein paar mehr Kategorien hinzugefügt und ihr eine eigene gegönnt - in der Hoffnung, dass noch mehr Bilder kommen. ;-) Ich schaue gerne mal ein paar durch. File:300px-Alexei_Michailowitsch_Markow.jpg werde ich mir gleich vornehmen, denn da hast du wohl aus Versehen nur die Vorschauversion hochgeladen. Aber wie ich sehe, klappts doch schon ganz gut hier. :) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 19:45, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ein paar von diesen Fotos vor der weißen Wand habe ich beim Berliner Sechstagerennen morgens nach dem Frühstück gemacht. Weiß Wand und weiße Gesichter machen so Gangster-Gesichter. Musste Damian Zielinski schon versprechen, unbedingt bald ein neues zu machen :) --Nicola (talk) 19:51, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kannst du bei File:Alexei Michailowitsch Markow.jpg mal die "-sa"-Einschränkung aus beiden CC-Lizenzen rauslöschen und damit unter den beiden cc-by-3.0 freigeben? Sonst könnten wir die kleine Commonsversion eigentlich nicht mit der großen Version zusammenlegen. Weil die kleine Version hattest du ohne -sa lizenziert. Auf in der dewp aber nur mit -sa. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 20:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Puuu... ich hasse diesen Bildermist :) und diese Lizenzen... muss jetzt mal schauen, ob ich verstehe, was Du meinst. --Nicola (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So recht, junger Mann? (bist Du denn einer, weiß ich garnicht...) --Nicola (talk) 20:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, bin ich kindisch, nervend oder was anderes?

Ja, danke - so dachte ich es mir. Unter anderem deswegen riet ich eigentlich vom selbst "verschieben" ab - ja, das schrieb ich nicht, weil es schwer verständlich ist. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 21:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, Du bist nicht kindisch oder nervend. Dieser Lizenz-Mist nervt, da kannst du ja nix für :) Meine Bemerkungen fallen unter "Kölner Humor", mach Dir nix draus. Aber ich lerne das sicherlich alles noch, nachdem ich jetzt diese ganze Hochladerei, Verschieberei und Löscherei halbwegs in den Griff bekommen habe :) Ich finde es gut, dass Du da ein Auge drauf hast. Das meine ich jetzt ehrlich :) --Nicola (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(BK - reinquetsch) Okay, verstehe. :-) Es steht übrigens auch noch das Angebot mal in den Chat zu kommen (siehe z.B. de:Benutzer:Saibo/Chat).

Eigentlich mag ich deine Dateien gar nicht so genau durchgucken, denn sonst finde ich vielleicht Urheberrechtsverletzungen. ;-) Ein paar habe ich gerade mal angeklickt: Bei de:Datei:DenkmaliIndurain.jpg hast du z.B. auf jegliche Rechte verzichtet - hingegen bei der Kopie in Commons die Nutzung eingeschränkt (cc-by-3.0). Die Datei in dewp darf so eigentlich nicht gelöscht werden, denn Lizenzen sind nicht zurücknehmbar. Hier müsstest du die Commonsdatei mit {{PD-self}} versehen. Das können auch andere Leute machen, aber dann muss halt eigentlich noch so wie ich es bei Alexei gemacht habe der Commonstransfer dokumentiert werden, damit nachvollziehbar ist, wo plötzlich die Lizenzen herkommen. Die kannst ja nur du erteilen.

Bei de:Datei:Olaf Pollack.jpg fehlt noch die GFDL (einfach noch "|GFDL" vor der }} anfügen.).

Ich glaube dann müsste ich mal alle durchsehen und gucken, was noch fehlt.. hmm. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 21:37, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noch ne Frage: Wenn die Dateien in der dt. Wikipedia gelöscht wurden, verschwinden die da auch aus meinen hochgeladenen Dateien? Dann hätte ich nämlich einen Überblick, was noch bei Commons fehlt, es gibt nämlich immer noch Fotos, die ich nicht hier hochgeladen habe. --Nicola (talk) 21:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Das erste beim Denkmal habe ich gemacht, das zweite bei Pollack habe ich nicht verstanden :)

Ich persönlich finde die Aufstellung der Lizenzen äußerst unübersichtlich und auch nicht gut erklärt. Deshalb habe ich es aufgegeben, das zu begreifen :) Da muss man schon wie Du ne Art Experte sein. --Nicola (talk) 21:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, sobald die Bilder in der dewp gelöscht wurden, verschwinden sie aus deiner dortigen "hochgeladene Dateien"-Aufstellung. Im Log bleiben sie noch sichtbar. Alle Dateien, die du hier hochlädst, kommen hier in deine hochgeladenen Dateien. Dateien, die von anderen Leuten transferiert wurden, sind dann in keiner der beiden Listen mehr.

Denkmal: passt. Ich habe mal noch vermerkt, wieso du hier überhaupt einfach so die Skulptur fotografieren darfst: {{FoP-Spain}}. Wäre das FOto beispielsweise in Italien entstanden, müsste es hier gelöscht werden. Panoramafreiheit gibt es nicht in allen Ländern - siehe COM:FOP.

Pollack: Du editierst den Lizenzbereich und fügst noch "|GFDL" vor der }} hinzu. Also statt {{self|cc-by-3.0}} dann {{self|cc-by-3.0|GFDL}}

Zu den bösen Lizenzen: hast du dir schonmal das de:WP:BT angeschaut? Falls du es doch nochmal versuchen magst, wäre das vielleicht der passende Einstieg. An dem Bildertutorial bin ich mitschuld. ;-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:25, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe schon überall reingeschaut. Aber nicht jedermann kann für alles der Spezialist sein :) Frag mich was zu Radsportgeschichte... --Nicola (talk) 22:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Darf ich erfahren, wieso du nun bei File:Lisa Brennauer.JPG die Lizenz auf cc-by-sa geändert hast? Ich hatte oben geschrieben, dass du bei dem Bild alles richtig gemacht hast. Das stimmt - aber das bezog sich nicht darauf, dass das Bild richtig von der dewp hierher übertragen wurde. Danach habe ich jetzt geschaut: das Bild war in der Vorschauauflösung und mit abweichenden Lizenzen hier. Habe es korrigiert. Ich befürchte es passt bei fast keinem deiner Bilder. Bevor du so viele Bilder hier neu hochlädst hätten wir das lieber mal vorher besprochen. :( Das hast du zwar gut gemeint, aber es hat insgesamt jetzt wahrscheinlich keine Arbeit gespart - eher im Gegenteil. Denn das "richtige Version hochladen" (volle Auflösung) und Lizenzen nachtragen dauert länger, als wenn man es gleich neu transferiert hätte. Na mal scheun, vielleicht ist es bei anderen besser. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:20, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dazu kann ich jetzt wirklich nur sagen: Ich wollte das nicht machen, sondern hatte darum gebeten, dass es jemand anders macht. Jetzt weißt Du vielleicht, wieso. --Nicola (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um was hattest du gebeten? Ich kann dir gerade nicht folgen. Tut mir leid. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 19:22, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hatte darum gebeten, die Fotos nicht selbst in Commons hochzuladen, weil weiß, dass ich mich damit schwer tue. Weil das in der Vergangenheit so war, hatte ich es bleiben lassen und auf kundigere Menschen vertraut, die die Dateien verschieben. --Nicola (talk) 19:30, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Na dann haben wir uns falsch verstanden: Um was ich und Quedel dich gebeten haben ist neue Fotos nach Commons hochzuladen. Das ist jetzt ja nur etwas ungünstig, weil sie schonmal in der Wikipedia direkt hochgeladen waren. Anfürsich machst du das mit dem Hochladen hier ja super. Es ist nicht so schlimm jetzt - ich korrigiere es und dann ists gut. Nur deine Arbeit, du damit nun hattest, ist halt relativ überflüssig gewesen und für mich ginge es einfacher eines deiner Fotos von der Wikipedia selbst hierher zu verschieben statt einen inkorrekten Transfer (Lizenzen und Dateigröße) zu korrigieren. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 19:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Da bin ich mal wieder. Die voll aufgelöste Version fehlt wohl nur bei manchen; anscheinend bist du da beim Abspeichern durcheinander gekommen. Also halb so schlimm. Ein Hinweis noch: {{Personality rights}} bitte nicht mit "subst:" verwenden. Einfach {{Personality rights}} schreiben. ist korrigiert, wo ich es gesehen habe.

Was ich auch gesehen habe ist, dass du die Bilder wohl immer schon in die fremdsprachigen Artikel eingebaut hast: das ist toll! Da werden sich in anderen Wikipedias einige Leute freuen, dass es nun Bilder gibt. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 20:40, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Mal ein Lob! :) Leider ist die nächste Bahn-WM in Melbourne, da fahre ich wohl nicht hin, um Fotos zu machen, aber 2013 könnte Berlin anstehen, da kann ich dann wieder eine Orgie feiern. Und zwischendurch wird mir wohl auch der eine oder andere vor die Linse laufen.

Ich habe jetzt noch eine ganze Reihe Fotos, die nicht auf Commons sind, aber da sind manche von ganz alten deutschen Rennfahrern etc. dabei, da weiß ich gar nicht, ob die für anderssprachige Wikis in Frage kommen. --Nicola (talk) 20:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, ein Lob. Dir steht eigentlich ganz viel Lob zu, so wie du dich reinhängst. Es ist jetzt halt nur leider durch dein hochmotiviertes "Vorpreschen" nicht optimal gelaufen. Nunja, immerhin kennst du dich jetzt aus. ;-)

Es sollten möglichst alle Fotos nach Commons, die hier erlaubt sind. Nicht nur jene die international interessant sind. Zum Beispiel damit wir alles hier in die Kategorien einsortieren können. In der de.Wikipedia haben wir nicht so feingliedrige Dateikategorien, weil es ja gar nicht so viele Dateien gibt.

Bei den alten Fotos, die du in der de.Wikipedia mit der 100-Jahre-Regel hochladen kannst, ist das hier nicht ganz so einfach, denn die gibt es hier nicht. Ich habe gesehen, dass du irgendwie einen PD-US-Baustein auf einige alte Fotos draufgeklebt hast, die du nun hier hochgeladen hast. Du musst halt nur genau schauen, was in dem Baustein drinsteht - ob er überhaupt zutrifft. Ansonsten könnten die Fotos gelöscht werden. Ich schaue demnächst auch mal drüber.

Wenn du dir unsicher bist, dann lade alte Fotos, die du nicht fotografiert hast, nur hier hoch, wenn der Fotograf schon mehr als 70 Jahre tot ist (dazu musst du ihn natürlich kennen), und ansonsten weiterhin bei WIkipedia. Siehe zum Unterschied von Wikipedia und Commons: de:WP:NCF Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:29, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ralf Matzka Porträt.jpg

Ich habe gesehen, dass Du das Foto von ihm mit Europameister kategorisiert hast. Mein bisheriger Kenntnisstand war, dass Junioren-Titel nicht zu einer solchen Kategorisierung berechtigen. Ist das hier anders? --Nicola (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Das hat der Commonshelper so vorgeschlagen, weil er in der de.wikipedia auch in "Europameister (Radsport)" ist. Die Kategorie "European championships" hier stimmt eigentlich noch nicht ganz, denn das ist ja nuur die Kategorie über alle "Europameisterschaften". Bisher gibt es aber keine für Radsport und auch nicht für Europameister im Radsport, wenn ich recht sehe. Ich glaube ich hole die drei Radsportler, die ich da mittlwerweile reingetan habe wieder raus. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:14, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mit den Europameistern im Bahnradsport muss man ohnehin vorsichtig sein, es gibt da so manche, die nach heutiger Lesart "inoffiziell" sind, da sie nicht von einem europäischen Verband organisiert wurden und Einladungsrennen waren. --Nicola (talk) 06:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe sie (auch aus dem Grund, dass es der falsche Kategorietyp ist) entfernt. Dennoch solltest du dann wohl mal nach dem deutschen Artikel schauen, denn da steht es ja so. ;) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 16:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Siegerehrung_Zeitfahren_Frauen_WM_2011.jpg

Hallo mal wieder Nicola, bist du mit meiner Bearbeitung von File:Siegerehrung_Zeitfahren_Frauen_WM_2011.jpg zufrieden, oder soll ich sie unter neuem Namen hochladen? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 16:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin mit der Bearbeitung zufrieden :) --Nicola (talk) 13:19, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:ProRace Berlin 2011 Podest Berlin.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:ProRace Berlin 2011 Podest Berlin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ProRace Berlin 2011 Podest Berlin.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kam Solusar (talk) 11:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Pro Race Brandenburger Tor.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pro Race Brandenburger Tor.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pro Race Brandenburger Tor.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kam Solusar (talk) 11:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Nicola, "Veröffentlichung unter Angabe Fotonachweis Upsolut/Hochzwei." und "zur honorarfreien Verwendung" steht auf den Quellseiten. Hast du die Bilder basierend auf dieser Angabe hochgeladen, oder hast du noch eine weitere Genehmigung? Von CC-by-sa 3.0 (diese Lizenz hast du bei den Dateien angegeben) steht ja nichts auf der Webseite. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 15:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich habe die Agentur um eine Genehmigung gebeten. Und mit diesen Lizenzen kenne ich mich ja nicht aus , das weißt Du doch :) --Nicola (talk) 15:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eventuell, bei großzügiger(!) Auslegung reicht die Angabe auf der Webseite sogar - aber dann nicht mit der Lizenz, die du angegeben hast. Mit E-Mailgenehmigung wäre super. Wenn du Hilfe brauchst, melde dich. :-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 22:29, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welche Lizenz wäre denn geeignet? --Nicola (talk) 06:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Nicola, hatte deine Antwort wohl übersehen. Es würde eventuell für {{Attribution}} reichen. Aber das wäre wirklich ziemlich haarig. Denn ob auch Bearbeitung erlaubt ist, ist nicht sehr klar - sie schreiben ja "Veröffentlichung unter Angabe Fotonachweis Upsolut/Hochzwei." (Hevorhebung von mir). Veröffentlichung hört sich eher danach an, als ob Bearbeitungen nicht erlaubt sind. Zumindest ist nicht klar, dass sie erlaubt sind. Am besten wäre, wenn die Leute einfach {{Cc-by-3.0-de}} (mit Link auf den Lizenztext) (oder auch {{Cc-by-3.0}}) hinschreiben würden, dann wär's klar. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:César Simar.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Nicola, nun ist zwar eine hier existente Lizenz angegeben - aber sie stimmt nicht. Schau doch mal was in ihr steht: "70 Jahren nach dem Tod des Urhebers.". Das Bild solltest du besser in die de.wikipedia mit {{Vorlage:Bild-PD-alt-100}} hochladen. Und natürlich noch angeben, wieso der Urheber dir unbekannt ist (steht etwas im Buch? was hast du unternommen, um ihn herauszufinden?). Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Saibo, ich habe aus diesen Büchern bestimmt schon 50 Dateien hochgeladen, es gab bisher nie Probleme. Und in diesen Sport-Alben sind nie Namen von Fotografen angegeben.

Dann lade ich das in der de:WP hoch. --Nicola (talk) 05:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nur weil es keine Probleme gibt, heißt es nicht, dass alles okay ist. ;) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 05:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verschieben

Hallo Nicola, zu Commons:Forum#File:Schrittmacher_Motorr.C3.A4der_Erfurt.jpg: verwende für Verschiebeanfragen bitte einfach die dafür vorgesehene Vorlage: {{rename|Neuername.Dateiendung|Grund für die Umbenennung}} Siehe auch Commons:Dateien verschieben für mehr Informationen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 20:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für den Hinweis. Fürs nächste Mal :) --Nicola (talk) 21:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Nicola,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Log bis 2011-04-01 14:19:12 gedreht

Hallo Nicola, ich bin mal schnell dein Log [1] durchgescrollt (nur die erste Seite - bis 2011-04-01 14:19:12) und habe alle falschen Bilder drehen lassen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 17:51, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, ich hatte heute auch schon einige gedreht. Wobei ich immer noch das Problem habe, dass manche Bilder im Log falsch rum in der Ansicht sind, dann will ich sie drehen, aber dann wäre sie lt. Vorschau falsch. Das verstehe ich noch nicht recht :( --Nicola (talk) 17:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, sorry, wir haben irgendwie ein Serverproblem heute - das führt zu falschen Ansichten beim Drehwerkzeug. Hatte ich eben auch. Rillke hat das Drehwerkzeug jetzt geändert, um den Serverfehler zu umgehen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 18:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, bin nun auch durch die restlichen 500 Dateien durch. In 1,5h sollten alle richtig sein. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 18:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank! Ich schau mir das Ganze dann noch mal in ein paar Tagen an. Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Nicola!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 21:53, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Köln Frankfurter Str.34a.jpg was uncategorized on 14 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:53, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

erl. --Nicola (talk) 11:44, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Villa Oerlikon

Wir haben drei Foto's auf commons gesetzt, im Kategorie Category:Villa Oerlikon. Vielleicht gehen wir noch einmal zurück mit besseres Wetter, aber diese drei Foto's sind schon da mit eine Freie Lizenz. Milanderoo (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ja, das ist klasse, aber: Man kann den Namen nicht richtig sehen.... Das war doch das wichtige... :) Sorry... --Nicola (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Guten tag

Könnten Sie bitte einen Grund für mich, um die Datei zu bewegen Datei: Neuername.Köln Deutz-Mülheimer-Str. 147-155.jpg bitte, damit ich die Anfrage nicht bearbeiten. Danke. Prost. --Ceradon (talk) 01:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ceradon, a tip: do use automatic translation programs only in addition to posting the original text. ;-) It messed up the link and the German is not really good. If you want to provide a service for the reader just post English and the automatic translation (clearly stating that it is a automatic translation).

I have moved File:Neuername.Köln Deutz-Mülheimer-Str. 147-155.jpg to File:Köln Deutz-Mülheimer-Str. 147-155.jpg as requested - it was a typo / mistake left over from the first renaming request (was prefiously unidentified). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 04:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.

Willst du auch selbst Dateien verschieben können? Wenn du dich nicht sträubst ... ;-) Ich denke nicht, dass du selbst Commons:Dateien verschieben nicht besser als andere Dateiverschieber beachten wirst und du kannst es für deine vielen Uploads brauchen. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 04:47, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, das ist toll. Wenn man mehrere Denkmäler fotografiert, passiert leider immer mal wieder Fehler. --Nicola (talk) 08:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bitteschön, gern doch. Wenn du hier vielleicht ein wenig beim Patrollieren helfen willst, sag Bescheid. Und frage natürlich gern, wenn du fragen zum Verschieben hast. Du hast auf jeder Dateiseite nun "Verschieben" und "Verschieben & Ersetzen". Zweitere Funktion trägt die Datei automatisch bei User_talk:CommonsDelinker/commands ein. Allerdings muss die Liste von Admins erst noch geprüft werden, eh der Bot die Dateien dann ersetzt sodass es bei z.B. nur einer Verwendung (sind ja ganz unten auf den Dateiseiten aufgeführt) schneller und zeitsparender ist, diese eine Verwendung schnell manuell zu ersetzen. ... wahrscheinlich für dich eh irrelevant, weil du wohl vorerst nur deine eigenen Fehler beheben wirst. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide reason to move file and make sure you have a valid reason to move

Hi!

I noticed you often move files without telling why. Please mention one of the valid reasons to move the file.

If the reason for example is wrong proper nouns you could write "Reason #5 Chales should be Charles" or whatever the reason is. --MGA73 (talk) 10:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I did not think of that. A lot of photos of cyclists from the Agence Meurisse are named "Tour de France", so I renamed the photos with the name of the rider, which seems to me more clear. --Nicola (talk) 10:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stefan Nimke WM 2012.jpg

File:Stefan Nimke WM 2012.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

■ MMXX ^talk 19:14, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katrin Meinke Ipoh.jpg

File:Katrin Meinke Ipoh.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

■ MMXX ^talk 19:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiemu16.jpg

File:Wiemu16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Velodrome Roubaix 05.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 14:47, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, your pics can be used on the French Wikipedia under the local exception of Fair Use for recent buildings. Let me know if you want your pics transferred. Also, we at the French chapter have good hope that a FOP exception will pass soon into French law. I'll be very happy to undelete your pics when it's done. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 13:22, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jastrow. You may do so, I would be very happy :) --Nicola (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Externe Bild-Nutzungen

Ich hoffe, du bist nicht enttäuischt, aber bei den Dateien direkt in Category:Files by User:Nicola (nicht die subcats) hab ich keine externen Nutzungen gefunden. Bei Category:Files by User:Nicola/Ägypten bei 1 oder 2 Bildern; dort auf der jeweiligen Disku eingetragen. Bei Category:Files by User:Nicola/Spanien 1 Bild. Category:Files by User:Nicola/Flugsport habe ich nicht geprüft, da es ja keine eigenen und lauter alte Bilder sind. Du solltest deine typischen Urlaubsziel-Fotos vielleicht auch auf WikiTravel oder WikiVoyage hochladen, das fördert vermutlich ihre Verbreitung. Namens-Credit-Suche habe ich nicht gemacht, weil das bei "Nicola" zwecklos ist, stattdessen TinEye zusätzlich zur Google-Images-Mustererkennung.
Übrigens, bei File:Hondarribia03.jpg und File:Karte von Hondarribia, frühe Neuzeit.jpg solltest du die Beschreibung doch noch ergänzen: wo hast du das aufgenommen? was weiß man über den Maler? Von wann stammt das? Bei File:Elciego3.jpg für das es einige Nutzungen gibt, habe ich die FoP-Spain-Vorlage hinzugefügt (da es noch geschützt sein dürfte) und du könntest noch den Namen des Architekten heraussuchen. Ebenso bei File:Elciego5.jpg sollte der Künstlername ergänzt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 20:46, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, erst mal vielen Dank für Deine Mühe. Bei den Fotos aus Hondaribbia gibt es keinen "Maler". Das ist eine Infotafel auf dem Marktplazt. Bei dem Foto von dem Hotel habe ich Frank Gehry ergänzt, auch die Kategorie. Von den Aktentaschen habe ich leider keinen Künstler gefunden, habe schon beim Hochladen versucht, das herauszufinden. Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Nicola; I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to photograph the commemorative pavé in Roubaix and making them available under Creative Commons - they're a fantastically useful collection of photographs. :-) 188.28.158.213 12:11, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are welcome :) Unfortunately my photos of the new velodrome in building were deleted. --Nicola (talk) 13:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

categorization

I'd request you to be careful with new categories, only articles in some few wikipedias (not including big ones like English or German) have the pattern "Surname, First_name", it is not the case in Commons and categories like Klauke, Jurgen will not be accepted. Thanks - A.Savin 21:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, that was a mistake of me. --Nicola (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ русский ∙ slovenčina ∙ српски (ћирилица) ∙ srpski (latinica) ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Nicola,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 00:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Robert Marchand 2.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:44, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Kray Zwillinge 01.jpg

File:Kray Zwillinge 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Jamiri 21:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 01.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 22:37, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 02.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 13:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 03.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 13:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 01.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 13:50, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 06.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 06.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 04.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 04.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 05.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 05.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ylla

Hallo Nicola, beim Ylla/Tukan hat sich ein neuer Aspekt ergeben, User_talk:Túrelio#File:Yllawithtoucan1950.jpg. Kannst du mal kommentieren bzw. bei dem Hochlader genauer nachnaken. Er mag zwar das Copyright geerbt haben, aber der Urheber sollte soch korrekt angegeben werden. --Túrelio (talk) 06:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich? Wieso? :) --Nicola (talk) 09:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jetzt habe ich es gesehen. Ja, hätte ich auch gerne :) --Nicola (talk) 09:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tessie Reynolds

Servus!
Laut http://www.photohistory-sussex.co.uk/SpinkGallery1.htm ist der Urheber, den Du für File:Tessie_Reynolds_02.tif angegeben hast, inzwischen siebzig Jahre tot. Vielleicht möchtest Du die Lizenangabe jetzt ändern.
Gruß, Ciciban (talk) 08:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Nicola,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Nicola,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Mattamy National Cycling Centre.

Hi Nicola,

I was able to drop by the Mattamy National Cycling Centre recently. I was not able to enter the building. I've posted at the talk page for the article on the English Wikipedia. I'll provide updates in that talk page if I can get some better images so keep a watch there. I did manage one half decent photo through a window showing some cyclists on the track. I've also got a bunch more exterior shots. They've all been uploaded here on commons. Cheers. -- Whpq (talk) 02:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is really great!!! Thank you very much! Greetings from across the Atlantic, --Nicola (talk) 05:50, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

George Maduro

Hello Nicola, can you tell me why you removed the link I made from COMMONS cat.George Maduro to the WIKIPEDIA page of George Maduro? --Agaath (talk) 08:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can. On the one hand it is not usual to post a link like this in Commons, on the other hand the links are on the left site of the category, and the links connect to all languages where the articles exist. --Nicola (talk) 15:49, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oké --Agaath (talk) 18:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fiorenzo Magni

Hello, I am Italian. I see that you are passionate about cycling and maybe you can help me. I look for images of Fiorenzo Magni, have you something? --Gino74 (talk) 18:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gino, no I am sorry, I do not have photos of him. As you may see I mostly have photos of cyclists from nowaydays or very old ones. It is also a problem of copyright. --Nicola (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nicola Can you tell me the exact location of the Weckerling memorial and plaque and would it be possible to give me the GPS position. With your permission I would like to use the photographs in a book of cycle racer memorials I am producing. Kind regards Charles

Hello Charles, you may use the photos - if I get a copy of the book, please

Support

And I will try to find out the GPS position, please be patient. --Nicola (talk) 18:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes, unfortunately the people, who have the license, did not answer. May be they will after a while, I will remind them. --Nicola (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are still reading here: Please do send an email to me. --Nicola (talk) 03:45, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Velodromo Bicentenario

Hi. Absolutly... Well, I can take pictures of the outside of the building. In the inside maybe when there's a competition, but I will try. --Luisalvaz (talk) 23:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Luisalvaz, thank you very much! Outside would be nice already :) May be there is just a training and you would be allowed to enter.

I started to write the article- --Nicola (talk) 03:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jules Beau

Hello, thanks for categorizing pictures of Jules Beau ! I'll continue to upload his albums soon (I'm downloading n°17 atm). JeanBono (talk) 07:24, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, I mostly categorized the cyclists and cycling events, because this is where I know about. But I will have to have correct some categories after, because some things only became clear after a while. I am really thankful for the photos! I wrote articles about most of the old cyclists for the German Wikipedia, but I did not have photos or bad ones from old newspapers :) --Nicola (talk) 07:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I wanted to upload all these albums and crop/rotate all pictures later (next winter) and link pictures to Wikidata and/or WP articles. However I'm glad someone else do this for me :) JeanBono (talk) 11:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is hard work :) May be we can do a sort of "job sharing". I am now doing a "first tour", but that wont do. --Nicola (talk) 11:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your license template

I just noticed that your personal license template is transcluding the "Files by DerHexer" category... I'm assuming you used his as a model, and missed removing that. It's way down at the bottom. Revent (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

:( --Nicola (talk) 14:24, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's fixed now. Just FYI, I skimmed over the whole set (yes, all 400-odd, lol), fixed the double licenses, fixed the orientations that were left, and found a few places where templates had somehow gotten mangled. Also, there were a dozen or so with typos in the filenames... they were "2015 2015". Also fixed. Enjoy. :P Revent (talk) 02:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Revent: OMG, I feel ashamed... I knew about "2015, 2015" that was a copy and paste-mistake. I will have a look at the measures that I hopefully I will not make mistakes like this again. Thank you so much, --Nicola (talk) 18:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to feel ashamed about, at all.... think of it this way.. other than the VFC misfire (and it's not an easy tool) you made about a dozen errors in approximately 400 files... that's well over a 95% reliability. Everyone makes some mistakes. Revent (talk) 04:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo UEC-EM 2015.jpg

File:Logo UEC-EM 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leonprimer (talk) 06:49, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Bahn-EM 2015.jpg

File:Logo Bahn-EM 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Leonprimer (talk) 06:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 UEC European Track Championships

Hello,

A quick message just to tell you that I've covered the 2016 edition ;) I'm happy to see that the Wikimedia movement is able to cover those events each year in different countries. Pyb (talk) 10:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message! And I am happy that I made last year in Grenchen many photos of riders which are useful for many articles. In November I am going to the World Cup in Apeldoorn, so new photos will be arriving. --Nicola (talk) 11:09, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding information

Hi, please stop this kind of edits. You are breaking the template and causing the files to appear in problem categories. Jcb (talk) 14:16, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about repairing the template instead of deleting the names? Without names the photos are useless. --Nicola (talk) 14:17, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but in the time I repaired the first one, you broke 4 more, so it seemed more efficient to me to make you stop breaking them, rather than cleaning up behind you. Jcb (talk) 14:24, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you did not "repair", but revert. Of course it is not important to know who is on the photo. --Nicola (talk) 14:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I DID repair the first one, but in the time you broke 4 more. If you are too lazy to even check the result of your edit before moving to the next file, why do you expect me to fix your errors for you? Just make your edits again, this time without breaking things. Jcb (talk) 14:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely impudent and impolite. --Nicola (talk) 14:39, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If that's all you can utter, you'd better move away from your computer and take a cup of coffee before you return. Jcb (talk) 14:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still. If I was too lazy I would have given a damn on other peoples photographs. Now I do. --Nicola (talk) 14:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Möglicherweise war "lazy" nicht sehr höflich, aber wäre dir "sloppy" lieber gewesen, nachdem du offenbar nicht die Vorschau benutzt hast? Auch auf commons fangen Vorlagen mit zwei geschweiften Klammern an, wenn man die löscht, ist so eine Vorlage kaputt. Das hätte dir eigentlich auffallen müssen, bevor du weitergemacht hast. Statt nun die beleidigte Leberwurst zu spielen, sag einfach "scheiße, blöd gelaufen", entspann dich und mach dein Programm danach in Ruhe weiter. Weißt ja jetzt, wie es geht. -- Smial (talk) 15:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hatte mit dem Kategorisieren aufgehört und versucht herauszufinden, was ich falsch gemacht hatte. Da wäre es hilfreicher gewesen, mich darauf hinzuweisen, wo der Fehler liegt anstatt zu revertieren. Es ist auch Arbeit, die Namen herauszufinden.

Ja, und "lazy" fand ich eine Frechheit, und finde das immer noch. Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 15:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sicher ist das Arbeit, die Namen herauszufinden, und manchmal ist es unmöglich. Das weiß ich sehr genau. Ist einer der Gründe, weshalb ich bei meinen Konzertfotos hoffnungslos steckengeblieben bin. Hatte halt den Ehrgeiz, immer alle Bilder sogleich beim Upload korrekt zu benamsen, anstatt alles stumpf unter "<Festivalbezeichnung> <Jahr> <Bildnummer>.jpg" abzukippen und dei Arbeit anderen zu überlassen. Entsprechend zunächst während der Knipsphase aus Zeitmangel alles Unbekannte bzw. Aufwendige zunächst vertagt, dann noch mehr vertagt, dann noch mehr..., nuja. Kind ist im Brunnen. Aber in deinem Fall hast du die eigentliche Arbeit ja schon fertig gemacht und nur beim Eintragen einen syntax error erzeugt, den du mit copy&paste einfach hättest reparieren können. Ds hätte natürlich auch ein Aufpasser machen können, aber warum das hier auf commons nicht unbedingt immer gemacht wird, habe ich oben ja schon erklärt. -- Smial (talk) 17:12, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nun, eine freundliche Aufklärung hätte es auch getan. Aber ich bin jetzt "lazy" - wo kämen wir hin, wenn ich einen freundlichen Commons-Admin Lügen strafe würde? --Nicola (talk) 20:58, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Die Ansprache war ja wirklich nicht sehr freundlich. Ich wollte nur für Verständnis werben für Leute, die in der Hektik schon mal "kurz ab" formulieren. Laß dich nicht verdrießen. --Smial (talk) 08:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Duplicate

...kleiner Hinweis fürs nächste Mal ;-) Grüße --Brackenheim (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Brackenheim: Danke! Ich hoffs, ich erinnere mich beim nächsten Mal daran :) --Nicola (talk) 18:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte. Ich kann Dich ja daran erinnern =) --Brackenheim (talk) 18:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Brackenheim: Menno, war ja sicherlich nett gemeint, das mit dem Drehen, aber Du hast jetzt meine Arbeitsorga durcheinander gebracht :) --Nicola (talk) 21:36, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, tut mir Leid. Wenn ich solche Bilder finde, drehe ich die immer gleich um. Kam noch nie auf die Idee, dass das beabsichtigt sein könnte... --Brackenheim (talk) 23:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Brackenheim: Ich habs überlebt :) --Nicola (talk) 23:44, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Hello Nicola,

You claim that you sent an email to OTRS about having the following image, File:2016 2017 UCI Track World Cup Glasgow 03.jpg, used on Wikimedia Projects. Could you please give the ticket number for the file? -- MCMLXXXIX 20:35, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did not send the email, but the photographer John Hewat sent an email for the whole category. --Nicola (talk) 20:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you in anyway have contact with the photographer? If so, could you ask him for the ticket number for the file? The file has not been confirmed, and will soon be deleted. -- MCMLXXXIX 20:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why this one, and what about the others? :) I will ask him tomorrow, as I see he is on a party right now. --Nicola (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)--Nicola (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The others will be deleted soon as well. -- MCMLXXXIX 20:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MCMLXXXIX: Ticket #201701051002757. --Nicola (talk) 17:42, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The ticket doesn't exist. -- MCMLXXXIX 18:26, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MCMLXXXIX Well, I have the OTRS-Email, it is 2017010510012757. You can write me an email and I can forward the email. --Nicola (talk) 19:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doppelte Kategorie?

Hallo Nicola, bin gerade beim Stöbern auf zwei Kategorien von dir gestoßen. Was unterscheidet Category:Pacemakers (cycling) und Category:Pacer (Cycling)? Und falls beide Kategorien den deutschen Begriff Schrittmacher wiedergeben sollen, was ist dann das bessere Lemma um die Kategorien zusammenzuführen? --alexscho (talk) 11:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexscho: ups, da habe ich wohl Mist gebaut. Ich repariere das. "Pacemaker" ist der richtige Ausdruck. Gruß, --Nicola (talk) 15:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Na das ging ja schnell. Vielen Dank! --alexscho (talk) 14:43, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bahnradsportler-Bilder

Hallo, Nicola, du kannst mit mir Deutsch sprechen. Wir sind zwei Bahnrad-Sport begeisterer, du hast eine große Sammlung von Bildern hochgeladen, monumentale Job hast du geleistet. Ich beschäftige mich mit dem Artikeln dieser Sportler auf der spanischen Wikipedia; ich schätze, ich habe mehr als 500 hundert Biographien schon gemacht. Und ihnen gehört das sprechende Bild. Es gibt tolle Bilder (wie viele von der 2015 EM), aber in manchen Fällen, das Bild ist entweder zu groß für das Infobox oder der Motiv ist schlecht plaziert, dann benutze ich das Croop-Tool und versuche es zu verbessern. Es ist keine Missachtung von deiner Arbeit, es ist nur eine Verbesserung. Ganz objektiv frage ich dir, in welchen von diesen beiden Fällen passt das Bild besser in der Infobox, in diese oder in diese andere? Ich hoffe deine Anmerkung aufgeklärt zu haben. Leonprimer (talk) 12:20, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - gebongt :) Ich wunderte mich halt nur. Ich habe übrigens auch viele Bahnrad-Arikel über Spanier und Spanien geschrieben, zuletzt baute ich diesen aus: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vel%C3%B2drom_d%E2%80%99Horta_Miquel_Poblet.

Ich persönlich mache absichtlich Fotos von weiter weg: Zunächst möchte ich den Leuten nicht auf die Pelle rücken, und ich mag lieber Fotos mit "Atmosphäre" drumherum. Gerade bei Wettbewerben schwitzen die Fahrer oftmals noch, und man muss doch nicht jeden Pickel oder so sehen. Das ist jedenfalls meine Meinung.

Ich habe aber einen Löschantrag auf das Foto von Joanna gestellt. Sie hat eine Krankheit, und deshalb finde ich, sollte ihr Kopf nicht zu nah zu sehen sein, so dass man jede Ader z.B. sehen kann. --Nicola (talk) 12:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Nicola,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:42, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Kick Pruijsbrug

Hi, I made the trip to the Kick Pruijsbrug. I have added pictures here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Kick_Pruijsbrug and created an article about the bridge: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kick_Pruijsbrug --Hannolans (talk) 21:22, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hannolans: Geweldig! Hartelijk bedankt!

[2]. I choose anonther lemma. --Nicola (talk) 07:01, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Nicola, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Köln Regentenstr. 31.jpg

File:Köln Regentenstr. 31.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

CKosch (talk) 11:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Richard Banusch 2014.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 08:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Richard Banusch 2014 (cropped).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 08:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bicycles

Not having heard back from you, I've taken the liberty of setting up Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/08/Category:Historical bicycles and Category:Vintage bicycles. - Jmabel ! talk 16:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Thank you! I will visit you there :) --Nicola (talk) 16:02, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

File:Müngersdorf (Köln), Adenauerweiher, spätrömischer Sarkophag Tafel.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)}, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 18:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tao Geoghegan Hart.jpg.

Hey there; just wanted my gratitude for what you did with the photo. Looks much sharper than my original take. Any tips or particular editing tools?! ;) Danke schön! Craig (talk) 16:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cs-wolves I am happy that you are not angry with me :) But Tao is already "british pale", so I thought it was a bit too much. I very simply used "Microsoft Picture Manager", automatic correcion, than I made it a bit darker, that's all :) --Nicola (talk) 18:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely no issues whatsoever with changes such as lighting fixes, and minor amendments to the textures. I don't mind cropping either, as long as the original photo is kept too. Somebody cropped one of my previous photos without keeping the original a year or so back, and to say I was annoyed was an understatement... British pale... Love it! We don't get a lot of sun, admittedly...

Is this the program you use, or is it a stand-alone application? I usually use Windows Photo Editor, but I'm not too sure if the photos are towards a good standard. Seems to bloat ones I have with my phone, but does the job with my camera photos. As we would say here, a "double-edged sword" for happiness. Craig (talk) 19:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is a standard programme, not really "sophisticated" :) --Nicola (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As long as it is not Photoshop, it can be beneficial to me! Craig (talk) 21:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!

Hallo Nicola!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2017! Das Organisationsteam freut sich über mehr als 20.000 Bilder von deutschen Bau- und Kulturdenkmalen, die in diesem Jahr hochgeladen wurden, und möchte sich ganz herzlich bei Dir für deinen Beitrag zum weltweit größten, von Ehrenamtlichen organisierten, Fotowettbewerb bedanken!

Du hast noch bis zum 15. Oktober die Gelegenheit, Wettbewerbsbeiträge anderer Fotografen im Rahmen der Vorjury zu sichten und zu bewerten. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du dich daran beteiligst und mithilfst, die besten Bilder des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs auszuwählen. Gern kannst Du auch deine und andere Bilder in Wikipedia einbinden.

Fotos bewerten »

Bilder in die Wikipedia einbinden »

Nochmals vielen Dank für deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikipedia bebilderst! Solltest du Fragen haben, so kannst du dich gerne an infowikilovesmonuments.de wenden.

(Martin Rulsch (WMDE) im Namen des Organisationsteams von Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland, 9. Oktober 2017)

Pictures from 2017 EUC Track European Championships

Hi Nicola. I'm glad to see your pictures of cyclists - they surely are useful. But have you thought of renaming them to reflect the persons on each photo? That would make identification so much easier. Regards Amjaabc (talk) 21:56, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. On the one side I am still working on the project, on the other hand I thougth I named and catgorized every photo, so I did not just "think" of it. --Nicola (talk) 22:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Book cover Jock of the Bushveld.jpg

File:Book cover Jock of the Bushveld.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:22, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Melaten-Friedhof/Skulpturen ...

Hallo Nikola,
mit der Änderung der Kategorie meiner Dateien >Melaten-Friehof<, bin ich nur sehr bedingt und teilweise eins, denn durch die Änderung in >Skulpturen auf dem M.F.< werden die Dateien für den "Nicht-Kölner" weitaus schwieriger (oder gar nicht) auffindbar.
"Ordnungspolitisch", im Commens-Sinne, ist Deine Änderung vielleicht zum Teil noch nachvollziehbar, dem (auch überregional) bedeutenden Kunststandort Melaten aber dient sie absolut nicht.
Ich habe sehr viele Jahre in Köln gelebt und gehörte (und gehöre) dem "Freundeskreis Melaten" an: Melaten ist, berücksichtigt man Stadtgeschichte, Entstehungsgeschichte des Friedhofs, Kunst- und Kunstgeschichte, Baudenkmale, Skulpturen, reichhaltige Flora und Fauna - und vieles mehr - ein kulturgeschichtliches Kleinod der Stadt Köln und ein "Gesamtkunstwerk".
Die hochgeladenen Dateien zeigen in der Tat Skulpturen, deshalb akzeptiere ich die Änderung. Um die Dateien (und damit Melaten) aber weiter auch für den Interessierten an Kunst und Kultur auffindbar zu erhalten, werde ich meinerseits noch zwei weitere Kategorien einfügen.
Ich habe mit großer Freude gesehen, dass Du ebenfalls Aufnahmen von Melaten beigetragen hast; es scheint also, dass wir hier ein gemeinsames Interesse haben. Ich bin deshalb auf Deine Antwort gespannt!

Beste Grüße -- horst70, (Diskussion) 16:50 / 29.01.2018 (UTC)

@Horst J. Meuter: So ganz kann ich Deine Bedenken nicht nachvollziehen. Zuvor war die Kategorie wie Kraut und Rüben durcheinander, da konnte man nichts finden, es sei denn, man suchet über Volltextsuche. Warum sie dem "Kunststandort Melaten" nicht dienen soll, verstehe ich nicht. Und auch die Unterscheidung zwischen Kölnern und Nicht-Kölnern ist mir unverständlich. Unter "Skulpturen" etwa sind nur Fotos von Gegenständen zu sehen (oder sollte es sein), von denen weder Künstler noch die zugehörige Grabstätte bekannt sind.

Allerdings bin ich weder mit Kategorisierung noch mit den Benennungen gänzlich zufrieden, sondern grübele darüber noch nach. Zudem werde ich den gesamten Dateienbestand noch mehrfach durcharbeiten, um evtl. weitere Kategorien oder Beschriftungen zu ergänzen. Das ist noch nicht der Weisheit letzter Schluss, das ist mir klar. --Nicola (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Tag Nikola,
ich denke, dass Hochladen von Dateien auf Co. sollte vor allem als Möglichkeit gesehen werden, Informationen an interessierte Leute weiterzugeben, die diese Informationen dann - ihren individuellen Interessen folgend - nutzen oder sie ihrerseits - und in ihrem Sinne - weitergeben können.

Um eine möglichst große Anzahl gleich- oder ähnlich interessierter Menschen mit Informationen erreichen zu können, wählt man schließlich eine Kategorie, von der man überzeugt ist, dass diese hierzu die bestgeeignete ist.

Soweit werden wir vielleicht noch übereinstimmen, dann aber scheiden sich massiv die Geister!

Ich hatte seinerzeit beim Hochladen meiner Dateien ganz bewusst (und wie vor mir andere Gleichgesinnte auch) die bereits vorhandene Kategorie „Melaten-Friedhof“ ausgewählt und absichtlich auf eine zu sehr ins Detail gehende Kategorisierung verzichtet. Dieser Standort hat sehr viele Facetten, birgt sehr viel Sehens- und Beachtenswertes auf sehr unterschiedlichen Gebieten (wie (Stadt-) Geschichte, Kulturgeschichte, Kunst und Kunstgeschichte, Flora und Fauna, die man inmitten einer Großstadt kaum vermutet, …), sodass man ihm nur gerecht wird, wenn man ihn als „Gesamtwerk“ betrachtet und bekannt macht.

Um auf Deine Antwort zu kommen:
Deshalb meine Kritik an Deiner Verschiebung von Bilddateien und Deiner (pardon) Klein-Klein-Kategorisierung.
Du wirst am Ende vielleicht ein anderes Ordnungsprinzip eingeführt haben (ich möchte auch gar nicht behaupten, dass dabei nicht auch Positives zu verzeichnen sein wird), aber dem „Gesamtwerk“ Melaten dient das nicht und Du wirst ihm so nicht gerecht.

Zu meiner Unterscheidung Kölner und Nichtkölner, diese ist in diesem Zusammenhang einfach zu erklären:
man wird einem echten Kölner wohl kaum etwas zu Melaten erzählen wollen; dem Nichtkölner kann man den ursprünglichen Sichenhof der Stadt und die spätere Hinrichtungs,- Begräbnis,- Kunst und Kulturstätte hingegen sehr wohl versuchen näherzubringen, um Interessierte aus diversen Wissensgebieten aufmerksam zu machen, zu informieren und mit einzubinden.

Du schreibst in Deiner Antwort weiter:

- Unter "Skulpturen" etwa sind nur Fotos von Gegenständen zu sehen (oder sollte es sein), von denen weder Künstler noch die zugehörige Grabstätte bekannt sind.

Dazu einige Interpretationen zu dem Wort „Skulptur“ (Duden, Wikipedia):

 - sculptura, zu: sculpere = (durch Graben, Stechen, Schneiden) etwas schnitzen, bilden, meißeln
 - Werk eines Bildhauers
 - Plastisches Bildwerk

Ich sehe mich auch angesichts dieser angekündigten Kategorisierung in meiner Kritik an Deiner Aktion erneut bestätigt.

Ein nicht vorhandener Künstlername oder eine nicht bekannte Grabstätte können doch wohl kaum ein Kriterium sein für die Kategorisierung in „Skulptur“.

Du wirst vielleicht verstehen, dass ich die Verschiebung meiner hochgeladenen Dateien von "Melaten-Friedhof" nach "Skulpturen" - neben dem erstgenannten Grund - auch angesichts des absehbaren Kategorien-Desasters nicht sonderlich gutheißen kann. Ich möchte diese nicht irgendwann in einer Kategorie "Aussortiertes" wiederfinden, denn dazu waren sie definitiv nicht gedacht (was natürlich Kritik an diesen absolut nicht ausschließen soll). -- horst70, (Diskussion), 22:53, 01.02.2018 (UTC)

@Horst J. Meuter: Guten Morgen, Dein Post zeigt mir, dass wir von vollkommen unterschiedlichen Blickwinkeln aus argumentieren.

Ich schreibe viele Artikel in der Wikipedia und deshalb ist für mich das wichtigste Kriterium für Kategorien, Fotos für interessierte Benutzer und Autoren nutzbar zu machen, auch durch Auffindbarkeit. Ich habe schon oft Kategorien erstellt.

Um ein Objekt als "Gesamtkunstwerk" darzustellen, ist Commons meiner Meinung nach der falsche Ort. Wenn man das möchte, muss man eine eigene Internetseite "Melaten-Friedhof" erstellen.

Deine Unterscheidung zwischen Kölnern und Nicht-Kölnern halte ich für überzogen. Es gibt sicherlich viele "echte" Kölner, die auch vieles über Melaten nicht wissen. Und der Zusammenhang mit den Fotos auf Commons erschließt sich mir nicht wirklich.

Ich schrieb Dir auch, dass ich mit einigen Kategorien noch nicht recht glücklich bin, wie etwa den "Skulpturen". "Aussortiertes" gibt es indes überhaupt nicht und wird es auch nicht geben.

Ich werde mal zwei Benutzer aus Köln, die auch Fotos beigetragen haben, um ihre Stellungnahme bitten: User:1971markus, User:Geolina163 - wie seht Ihr das? --Nicola (talk) 06:55, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Es braucht auf Commons schon eine gewisse Tiefenkategorisierung, damit die Bilder einfacher auffindbar sind und nutzbar bleiben/werden. Das tut dem Gesamtbild ja keinen Abbruch. Aber, @Horst J. Meuter: , wenn du möchtest kannst du diesen Gesamteindruck ja durchaus schaffen - nutze die Seite Melaten-Friedhof an und bringe die Bilder dort in eine Reihenfolge, die das beinhaltet, was dir vorschwebt. Am besten noch mit ergänzenden Erklärtext. Marcus Cyron (talk) 07:24, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Auf eine Anregung hin habe ich die "Skulpturen" in "Grabkunst" umbenannt. --Nicola (talk) 07:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC) P.S. Ich heiße übrigens "Nicola" mit "c" :)[reply]

@Horst J. Meuter: , wie Marcus Cyron mit "c" schon geschrieben hat ist eine gewisse Tiefenkategorisierung hier auf Commons gewünscht. Um es Dir bei der Durchsicht der Category etwas einfacher zu machen nutze einfach das "Helferlein" auf Commons: Help:FastCCI. Das "Helferlein" sollte eigentlich für Alle als Standard eingestellt sein, wenn es bei Dir nicht angezeigt werden sollte kannst Du es in deinen persönlichen Einstellungen im 1. Abschnitt als "FastCCI" finden und aktivieren. Standard ist die Einstellung "Gute Bilder", aber du kannst auf "Alle Bilder" wechseln, so dass auch Bilder in allen Unterkategorien angezeigt werden. Ich hoffe dies wird Dir weiterhelfen. Lieben Gruß vom Markus mit "k" --1971markus ^{⇒ Laberkasten ...} 21:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nicola:

Guten Tag Nicola,

durch vielfaches Schreiben auf Wikipedia (oder wo auch immer) werden nicht automatisch Topbeiträge generiert. Diese Anmerkung nur am Rande, weil Du hier dezidiert auf Dein Schreiben hinweist, um Deinen Standpunkt zu unterstreichen.

Ich stimme Dir aber vollkommen zu, wenn Du feststellst, dass wir offensichtlich aus sehr unterschiedlichen Blickwinkeln argumentieren und sicher nicht zu einer Übereinstimmung kommen werden.

Ich denke, dass es deshalb wohl nicht lohnt, das Thema hier weiter zu verfolgen.

Die Anmerkungen von Markus C. Marcus Cyron und Markus K. 1971markus an dieser Stelle fand ich gut und sehr konstruktiv, ich werde sehen, inwieweit ich die Anregungen künftig umsetzen kann.

Gruß -- horst70 (Diskussion) 17.23 , 04.02.2018 (UTC)

Horst J. Meuter Ich hatte auf mein "vielfaches Schreiben" hingewiesen, um meinen anderen Standpunkt zu erläutern. Die Art und Weise, wie Du mir deshalb jetzt virtuell vors Schienbein trittst, finde ich mehr als ärgerlich, deshalb möchte ich auf meiner Disk. hier diese Diskussion beenden. Du kannst diese gerne woanders weiterführen. --Nicola (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Grabstätten_auf_dem_Melaten-Friedhof

Category:Grabstätten_auf_dem_Melaten-Friedhof has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 13:02, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yevgeniya Romanyuta

Hello ǃ We have problems with these pictures :

2015 UEC Track Elite European Championships 152.JPG
Yevgeniya Romaniuta Ech 2015 (cropped).jpg
Yevgeniya Romaniuta Ech 2015.jpg

This cyclist is not Yevgeniya Romanyuta ǃ Here is Yevgeniya Romanyuta. Can you move the name of yours pictures, please ? Thanks a lot--Toïlev (talk) 11:58, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think i have find Yevgeniya Romanyuta in yours pictures :

2015 UEC Track Elite European Championships 153.JPG
Alexandra Chekina ECh 2015.JPG

Because here is Aleksandra Chekina--Toïlev (talk) 12:13, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Toïlev I am in Apeldoorn right now, I will change this after my return. Sorry! --Nicola (talk) 12:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem ǃ You make a very good job ǃ--Toïlev (talk) 12:55, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Nicola (talk) 12:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Toïlev But she is not Aleksandra but Yevgeniya, right? god, what a mess :) --Nicola (talk) 23:27, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry ǃ It's just a small inversion ǃ The first three photos are Aleksandra Chekina, the last two are Yevgeniya Romanyuta and that's all ǃ ;-)--Toïlev (talk) 06:24, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plakat im öffentlichen Raum

Hallo Nicola, vielleicht kannst Du mir weiterhelfen, da ich jetzt doch Zweifel habe: Dürfen selbst fotografierte Plakate wie z.B.

File:Tremezza von Brentano - Plakat.jpg

Tremezza von Brentano - Plakat

in Wikipedia veröffentlicht werden?

Gruß --Egidius~dewiki (talk) 14:59, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Egidius~dewiki: Soweit ich weiß, nein. Die Plakate sind Entwürfe von einem Künstler, der hat das Urheberrecht. Deshalb dürfen z.B. auch keine Wahlplakate hochgeladen werden, was schade ist, da man diese daher nicht dokumentieren kann. Ausgenommen ins permanente Kunstwerke. Gruß, --15:08, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Kannst Du Tremezza von Brentano - Plakat.jpg wieder löschen? --Egidius~dewiki (talk) 15:42, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kann ich leider nicht, ich bin keine Administratorin. Bitte wende Dich an commons:otrs, oder mache einen Schnelllöschantrag. --15:51, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

ok, wurde 'beantragt'. Gruß --Egidius~dewiki (talk) 16:01, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Selbst

Hi Nicola, woher kommt eigentlich das "selbst"[3] obwohl du den UploadWizard benutzt? --ArndBot (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ArndBot: Ich habe da anfangs etwas falsch gemacht, bin gerade dabei mehrere hundert Fotos hochzuladen. Du musst das nicht korrigieren, da ich alle Bilder nacharbeite. --Nicola (talk) 01:30, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Identification des coureurs et Wikidata

Bonjour Nicola. Pour les identifications j'ai remarqué que Template:Depicted person avait été adapté, et qu'il était possible d'utiliser directement l'identifiant de l'élément, voir sur File:Rund um Köln 2018 006.jpg, ça permet de faire le lien vers l'élément Wikidata s'il n'y a pas d'article dans un langage et d'afficher la description de l'élément. Pour ma part, je ferai peut-être une ou deux courses supplémentaires cette année, faute de moyens. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 16:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lage Nordparksiedlung Düsseldorf 1937.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 14:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Nicola/Archive

Tipps für Newbies

"Sichter"-Berechtigung auf deWP?

Disku zu Bildbeschreibungen

Tip: Categorizing images

Umbenennen

Siegerehrung_Zeitfahren_Frauen_WM_2011.jpg

File tagging File:ProRace Berlin 2011 Podest Berlin.jpg

File tagging File:Pro Race Brandenburger Tor.jpg

Verschieben

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Log bis 2011-04-01 14:19:12 gedreht

Tip: Categorizing images

Villa Oerlikon

Guten tag

Autopatrol given

Please provide reason to move file and make sure you have a valid reason to move

Notification about possible deletion

Externe Bild-Nutzungen

Thanks

categorization

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 01.jpg

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 02.jpg

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 03.jpg

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 01.jpg

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 06.jpg

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 04.jpg

Copyright status: File:Radrennbahn Dudenhofen 05.jpg

Ylla

Tessie Reynolds

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Mattamy National Cycling Centre.

George Maduro

Fiorenzo Magni

Velodromo Bicentenario

Jules Beau

Your license template

Adding information

Hi.

Doppelte Kategorie?

Bahnradsportler-Bilder

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

Kick Pruijsbrug

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Copyright status: File:Richard Banusch 2014.jpg

Copyright status: File:Richard Banusch 2014 (cropped).jpg

Bicycles

Image without license

File:Tao Geoghegan Hart.jpg.

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 in Deutschland!

Pictures from 2017 EUC Track European Championships

Melaten-Friedhof/Skulpturen ...

Yevgeniya Romanyuta

Plakat im öffentlichen Raum

Selbst

Identification des coureurs et Wikidata

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search