User talk:Niccolò Caranti (MUSE)

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Niccolò Caranti (MUSE)!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhynchocyon udzungwensis (Grey-faced sengi).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Excellent. Have added English name to scope. Please add geocoding. Charles (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

I only know that it was taken in Mwanihana forest, Udzungwa Mountains National Park, Tanzania (as you can see in description). I don't know the precise location and I honestly don't know how much precision is asked when geocoding. --Niccolò Caranti (MUSE) (talk) 16:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment The subject is exceptional, the geocoding does not need to be precise. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

   Done I've added approximate location. --Niccolò Caranti (MUSE) (talk) 07:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Good enough for me. Charles (talk) 13:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 15:26, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plecotus macrobullaris (Alpine long-eared bat).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Can you please link to Commons category so we can easily compare images (I know there aren't any others in this case). Thanks. Charles (talk) 12:53, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

   Done Sorry, I had linked the file instead of the category in the scope. --Niccolò Caranti (MUSE) (talk) 13:49, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support High resolution and great that it also has OTRS confirmation. -- Cirt (talk) 15:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Replica of Zaglossus bartoni (Eastern long-beaked echidna).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Should specify replica. Charles (talk) 13:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

  You mean the scope? Wouldn't it be to narrow? Consider that the eastern long-beaked echidna is a critically endangered species so it may not be easy to obtain photos of a real one. --Niccolò Caranti (MUSE) (talk) 13:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment I agree with Charles. This is not the image of a living animal or a stuffed animal, but a replica. We must add that term in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:54, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

   Done --Niccolò Caranti (MUSE) (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support OK now, though I don't like the white background and it's been poorly cut out. Charles (talk)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Parvancorina minchami - MUSE.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Parvancorina minchami - MUSE.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triceratops horridus skull - MUSE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:55, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tetractinella trigonella - MUSE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plesiadapis sp. - MUSE.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice and sharp. --Peulle 21:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ortiseia sp. - MUSE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:30, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 April 2016 (UTC)