User talk:New York-air

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, New York-air!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger vs T129

[edit]

Hi,

Let me draw your attention on the fact that the helicopter depicted on this file and others is not Eurocopter Tiger BJJ. BJJ displays is immatriculation under the pilot window, as visible on this photo, whereas the immatriculation of this aircraft is not visible at the same place (this pic as an example). Furthermore, you can clearly see that the paint scheme is different on the two aircrafts.

Now I agree with you that this aircraft is not a NH90 (and to be fair, I did not categorize it as such). Before making the categories changes, I was confused as well and thought that it was another Tiger. It is not, actually. Please notice how the air inlets are different on the two aircrafts; that the Tiger has 4 blades on it's rotor when the "yellow one" has 5; and that the Tiger has a 3 blade tail rotor on starboard when the other one has a two-blade tail rotor on port. One could also argue that when it is equipped with a reconnaissance pod, the system is not mounted on the nose of the Tiger but above the rotor head.

When I realised that the "yellow heli" wasn't BJJ, I tried to find it's immatriculation (spoiler alert: I failed). But I did find this picture of the same aircraft at the same display, which identifies it as a T129 ATAK. I'll admit that I was confused as well by the characteristic cockpit configuration and windows, but this aircraft is beyond any doubts not an Eurocopter Tiger. Sincerely, Gyrostat (talk) 21:42, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now I understood: the pictures i uploaded as NH90s are NH90s but the ones I uploaded as Eurocopter Tiger are not Eurocopter Tiger but T129 ATAK. I will go through every picture again and correct the name/categories soon. This was so confusing xD Sorry for the revertion --New York-air (talk) 13:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually there wer 3 differnt helicopters, I have now recategorized and renamed everything -New York-air (talk)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N1015X Air Tahiti Nui Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N1015X Air Tahiti Nui Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RA-21512 Beriev Be-200 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:30, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F-WWQA Dassault Falcon 8X 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 20:04, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RA-21512 Beriev Be-200 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments not perfect but QI in my eyes. --Ralf Roletschek 21:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 23:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N1015X Air Tahiti Nui Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:22, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A350-1000 F-WMIL 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RA-21512 Beriev Be-200 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:01, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A350-1000 F-WMIL 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:36, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A350-1000 F-WMIL 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good composition -- Spurzem 20:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 05:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NHIndustries NH90 EAY 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The contrast between object and sky is quite harsh. Is it possible to darken the sky and to brighten the helicopter itself? --Dirtsc 07:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Contrast seems fine to me --MB-one 11:56, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F-WWQA Dassault Falcon 8X 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:26, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 16

Hello New York-air:

I see you have nominated a number of plane images for QI. In most cases the composition is good but the exposure in many is overall too dark (could use some increase in vibrance and contrast as well) and the plane is often too tight to the edges of the frame. If you can correct these issues, your images would probably get an easier QI review.

Best, --GRDN711 (talk) 09:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can absolutely correct the cropping issues at most of the pictures, but I cannot change the lighting/ vibrance stuff since I don't have access to Lightroom or comparable products. Is it possible that you do it? Thank you for your time. -New York-air (talk) 15:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:00, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:37, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019

[edit]


Hallo New York-air,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F-WWQA Dassault Falcon 8X 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! T129 ATAK 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:17, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A350-1000 F-WMIL 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:08, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
To dark and to tight right crop imo, otherwise QI --ArildV 10:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It has a better crop now. -New York-air 19:50, 28 August 2019 (UTC) Still slightly dark, but ok for QI now imo. Good crop.--ArildV 15:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:05, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! N1015X Air Tahiti Nui Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:04, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Image is jammed at the front and back of the plane. Can you provide more space? --GRDN711 08:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Provided more space. -New York-air 15:55, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Done since 6 day, good quality. --ArildV 04:22, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airbus A330neo F-WTTN 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 14:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- ~riley (talk) 21:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

[edit]

Hallo New_York-air,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:09, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2021

[edit]

Hallo New York-air,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2021 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit über zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Im Herzen Deutschlands in Thüringen und in Niedersachsen sind neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die auf Fotos warten. Übrigens in der Hauptstadt Thüringens in Erfurt findet dieses Jahr die WikiCon vom 1. bis 3. Oktober statt. Dies könnte man mit einem Foto-Kurzurlaub vor der WikiCon in Thüringen verbinden …

Vor dem Hintergrund der Flutkatastrophe 2021 haben wir auch drei Sonderpreise ausgelobt. Damit sollen Fotos prämiert werden, die Kulturdenkmale zeigen, die zerstört wurden. Das Foto kann das Objekt vor oder nach der Zerstörung zeigen.

Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2021 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 18:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]