User talk:Neva

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:PelargoniumRoseum.JPG

[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 12:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. Sometimes I put my name and just forget the license. I went now and put the right template. --Neva 12:15, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aaa15.jpg

[edit]

Zdrave Neva, Image:Aaa15.jpg is Juniperus communis subsp. alpina, the first photo of this subspecies on wikipedia ;-) Could you add the altitude the photo was taken at, please? It would be interesting to know. - Thanks, MPF 20:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zdravei MPF, thanks for the juniper. I changed the name of the pic, so now all conifer lovers in the world can find and enjoy the alpine subspecies! :) I found it very near to Cherni vruh (the Black peak), the highest point of Vitosha, the mountain next to Sofia. So the altitude must be around 2200-2250 m. If you have some time and feel like recognizing non-conifers, you could also see the rest of the unnamed pictures I took around there: Category:Unknown flowers from Vitosha.
Next time you go to BG, drop a word here :) --Neva 16:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EriophorumAngustifoliumBulgaria.jpg

[edit]

Hello Neva, the determination of the plant is not totally right. It is not Eriophorum angustifolium, but Eriophorum vaginatum. Notice that this plants obviously are single-headed! Please correct it. -- Kind regards, Fice 20:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will. I put a series of photos in Category:Unknown flowers from Vitosha and asked in the Village pump for help in order to name them correctly. The Eriophorum angustifolium was the first suggestion I received. Could you please look at the remaining photos in the Category above and tell me the Latin names of the plants if you know them? Thank you! --Neva 20:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Quick addition: I've just seen that there is a second possibility: Eriophorum vaginatum or Eriophorum scheuchzeri (both are single-headed). -- Fice 20:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am confused now: here we have Image:Wollgras_Dosenmoor_cropped.jpg in the vaginatum section and Image:Smalbladet kæruld.jpg in the angustifolia, both single-headed? Could we ask for a third opinion? (Since I don't have one, I am only a linguist :) --Neva 20:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The first picture you mentioned is correctly described, the Danish one is not! Both are Eriophorum vaginatum. And I think, your's are also, because E. scheuchzeri does probably not grow in Bulgaria. The next place to exist obviously are the Carpathians in Romania, if I read this tiny map accurately. -- Fice 20:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • So, I now had a look at your unidentified plants and I made some indications there. But I'm not really familiar with Bulgarian mountain plants ;-) -- Fice 21:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And, finally, the determination of Eriophorum vaginatum now is 100 % confirmed. The type of growing in a "bundle", as we can see in this picture, is characteristical only for E. vaginatum. -- Fice 10:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very good, Fice, danke! :) Will change the name, but now have to run away from the comp. If you have more time until tomorrow, please, do it yourself :) --Neva 10:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TheWorldWontListen.jpg

[edit]

«A photo of Phil Collins' video installation»: sorry to me it's a derivative work, so it's a copyvio...

Gonioul (talk) 07:27, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I go to a museum and I take a photo of an artist's video installation and it is a copyvio. But I go to a museum, take a photo of a sculpture and it is not? Please, explain me the difference. (Just for the record: a video installation is not a film, so don't treat it as a shot of a frame.) --Neva (talk) 15:01, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please read Commons:Derivative works. Artists in a museum are usually long dead, taking a picture of a recent artist work IS a copyvio. - Gonioul (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Too bad, Gonioul, it seems that it really can't be kept here. If you are SO sure, please delete it or put the necessary sign on it. And, please, take a look at these two (sculptures, the first is in an open museum, the second in a park, both artists are dead but relatively not long time ago... these are mine, but on the same subject there are more photos): Image:EduardoChillidaHernani.JPG and Image:ThirteenLaughing.JPG. Merci --Neva (talk) 17:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Outdoor sculptures in Spain or Portugal are ok. Both countries have an exception from the "derivative work" rule for works permanently installed in public places. See COM:FOP#Portugal and COM:FOP#Spain. I've just tagged them with {{FOP}} to indicate this. Lupo 20:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Great, Lupo, thank you. --Neva (talk) 01:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:UrsFaes.jpg

[edit]

We had a server problem when you uploaded this image. Somehow, the license got lost. Please add the license manually, otherwise this file will be deleted after seven days. Cheers, Lupo 08:43, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fado in Porto

[edit]

Actually the name of the café/ bar is «O Boteko» na «Rua» Dom Manuel II.... and not O Botiko (Botico), Rúa Dom Manuel II.

Done, thanks. --Neva (talk) 21:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Neva!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 19:02, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:NadezhdaSliven.jpg

[edit]
File:NadezhdaSliven.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

193.225.200.93 12:17, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ChupaChupsLollipopSofia.jpg

[edit]
File:ChupaChupsLollipopSofia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 06:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Neva&oldid=110503425"