User talk:Neuceu

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Image:Michael of salonica.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Category:Icons (art).

EugeneZelenko 14:03, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Image deletion warning Image:31th G8 summit-family pic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 12:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

vitrail de la cathédrale de TOURNAI

[edit]

Je viens de prendre connaissance de votre correspondance relative au vitrail dont question en objet. Malheureusement je ne suis pas en mesure de satisfaire actuellement à cette demande. Toutefois si l'occasion se présente je ne manquerai pas de passer par Tournai où je me ferai un plaisir de photographier ce sujet en vue de son insertion sur Commons.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 17:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Clasement en cours...

[edit]

ne sois pas trop étonnée si tu ne vois plus les photos que tu est en train de télécharger. Je suis entrain de classer les photographies des oeuvres salles par salles, ce qui rendra plus facile la détermination des oeuvres manquantes. Miniwark 18:42, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Modèles Louvre

[edit]

Bonjour, je viens de créer deux modèles pour décrire les objets du Louvre, au cas ou cela t'intéresse voir -> Template:Information Louvre & Template:Louvre-en. Miniwark 20:19, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Code of Hammurabi.png

[edit]

Hello, this image which you uploaded, based on Image:177px-CodeOfHammurabi.jpg, has to be deleted because its license (PD-Art) can not apply to 3D pieces of art. This was only realised after the images had been used for sometime (see COM:DEL May 14), so you haven't done anything wrong, I'm just letting you know why your upload is going to disappear. Regards, pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SavonarolaPlaque.jpg

[edit]
Image deletion warning Image:SavonarolaPlaque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

gobeirne 23:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC) .[reply]

Image:Justinien 527-565.svg

[edit]

Hello - thank you for the map. It is very difficult to see the difference between "orange" and "red" - the colors blend together and look the same. When the map is small at 250px. -- Stbalbach 11:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

[edit]
 Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the
Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006
Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February.

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 22:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Photos de Ségolène

[edit]

Merci :-) Ça valait le coup de passer 3h debout bousculée par la meute de photographes/caméramen ! Être dans la tribune de presse (grâce à un coup de bol, je n'ai pas de carte de presse) ça aide quand même pas mal. Pour le reflex, ben… ça dépend de ce que tu veux faire et des sous que tu veux y mettre. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sinon, j'ai plus de photos de Ségo avec des attitudes un peu différentes. Tu penses que ça vaut le coup de les uploader aussi ou ça suffit comme ça ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tu compares deux boîtiers et deux objectifs assez différents là… Le D40 est un boîtier d'entrée de gamme alors que le 30D est un boîtier expert ; le 18-200 est un transstandard extrême alors que le 18-55 est un quasi-pro avec une plage de focales nettement plus normale. Le 30D est plus proche du D80 de Nikon. Sur le fond, étant Nikoniste, je te recommanderais évidemment la marque jaune, mais plus objectivement : Canon est meilleur que Nikon à haute sensibilité, les objectifs et accessoires sont généralement moins chers, l'autofocus et l'exposition Nikon sont un chtouille meilleurs (ça se discute). Au fond, à modèles équivalents, il vaut mieux essayer en magasin et prendre celui qui tombe le mieux sous la main. La prise en main et l'agrément de manipulation c'est important. Sinon tu as pensé aux outsiders, genre le Sony alpha ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tout de suite la comparaison paraît plus raisonnable :-) Le 18-200 VR est un objectif spécial vacances : tu emportes un seul objectif et zou. Pour sa plage de focales il est très bien, mais il a une distorsion monstrueuse et la pleine ouverture à 200mm est assez molle (c'est lui qui est utilisé sur Ségolène, faute de télézoom plus ouvert).
Sinon, le Sony alpha est en réalité un Konica Minolta. Pour l'objectif l'offre griffée Sony n'a pas l'air très folichonne, mais tu peux regarder du côté des opticiens tiers comme Sigma ou Tamron, qui proposent tous les deux un 17-70/2.8. Si tu veux je peux farfouiller dans mes vieux magazines photo et t'envoyer des photocopies sur les boîtiers/objectifs qui t'intéressent. (On peut peut-être continuer par mail). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Grande Arche de La Défense et fontaine.jpg

[edit]
File:Grande Arche de La Défense et fontaine.jpg

Hello, you have supported to the promotion of the image Image:Grande Arche de La Défense et fontaine.jpg to the Featured Picture status, and I thank you for that. Currently this image has been proposed to deletion by another user under the pretext that there is no FOP in France.

I believe that the image is not a copyright infringement; the main subject is the water from the fountain, the Grand Arche is unavoidable in the background. In what the lightning of the fountain is concerned, as user Arad mentioned in the original nomination, they are very simple and they do not have a special plan, so they cannot be copyrighted.

If you wish you can express your opinion on this issue on the deletion request page of this image, otherwise the image could disappear soon; the usage check indicates that the image is already used in around 150 pages around internation wikis (usage check), it would be a pity for the community to see a FP image disappear.

Thanks and best regards, --Atoma 17:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map source

[edit]

Hello! The article on the Byzantine navy is currently undergoing the FAC process, and concerns have been brought up by the reviewers on the accuracy of this map, which I have used in the article. If you could provide a source for it, it would be great. Thanks a lot, Constantine ✍ 05:41, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File:Strasbourg Palais des droits de l Homme.jpg

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Strasbourg Palais des droits de l Homme.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 15:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Le christ quittant le prétoire.jpg

[edit]
File:Le christ quittant le prétoire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Oursana (talk) 13:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

File:Byzantinische Dromone.PNG

[edit]
File:Byzantinische Dromone.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Peter Isotalo 02:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nile.jpg

[edit]
File:Nile.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

105.104.8.143 11:33, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:131 Bataille de Malazgirt.jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:131 Bataille de Malazgirt.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added some information and updated the URLs which were outdated. But honestly, this is obviously a manuscript from Bibliothèque nationale de France (as stated in the category and in the license), and there is no doubt about its source. --NeuCeu (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Neuceu&oldid=307444930"