User talk:Nachiiitox15
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 02:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Ralgistalk 05:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hola, Nachiiitox15: Primero, esto no es Wikipedia, sino Commons. Segundo, no puedes reclamar como tuyas imágenes que no lo son. Y tercero, son copias de periódicos que bien pueden estar protegidas por derechos de autor. --Ralgistalk 05:30, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- ¿Eres tú el titular de los derechos de autor del periódico, o simplemente tienes posesión física del periódico? Hay una gran diferencia en esto. --Ralgistalk 17:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- En ese caso, dado que una de las imágenes han sido publicada en otros sitios, es necesario que demuestres tu titularidad aprobando su autorización por medio del OTRS. Por otro lado, aunque las imágenes sean aprobadas, no veo dónde encajan en el alcance del proyecto, especialmente por el su calidad y por el hecho de pueden crearse mejores y más neutrales muestras del idioma. --Ralgistalk 02:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- Para probar que eres el titular, sigue los pasos descritos en el enlace que te di. Sin embargo, dudo que las imágenes se acepten como educativas por estos motivos: estoy seguro que una de ellas es publicidad, y pueden generarse ejemplos del idioma con herramientas como Inkscape; pero es casi inútil, pues casi nunca ha sido necesario usar muestras de ese tipo en los artículos cuando la escritura es latina. --Ralgistalk 02:51, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- En ese caso, dado que una de las imágenes han sido publicada en otros sitios, es necesario que demuestres tu titularidad aprobando su autorización por medio del OTRS. Por otro lado, aunque las imágenes sean aprobadas, no veo dónde encajan en el alcance del proyecto, especialmente por el su calidad y por el hecho de pueden crearse mejores y más neutrales muestras del idioma. --Ralgistalk 02:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
- ¿Eres tú el titular de los derechos de autor del periódico, o simplemente tienes posesión física del periódico? Hay una gran diferencia en esto. --Ralgistalk 17:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Lineas colectivo 555.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
High Contrast (talk) 18:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Ripley Iquique.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Jespinos (talk) 15:27, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Avenida Baquedano.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Avenida Baquedano.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Avenida Baquedano.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Jespinos (talk) 15:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-dks.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |