User talk:AlexanderRahm
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:02, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Empty broken files
[edit]Hi, the following files are all blank. Please upload another file on top of it, or mark them with {{Speedy}} to get them deleted. Currently they are blank, unused and serve no purpuse.
- File:BKV Erste Ausgabe Band 38 004.png
- File:BKV Erste Ausgabe Band 38 008.png
- File:BKV Erste Ausgabe Band 38 152.png
- File:BKV Erste Ausgabe Band 38 154.png
- File:BKV Erste Ausgabe Band 38 272.png
- File:BKV Erste Ausgabe Band 38 274.png
- File:BKV Erste Ausgabe Band 38 427.png
–Krinkletalk 14:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Every book has blank pages. Never delete them, because if you do so, nobody can know, why there are missing pages in the book! --Moros (talk) 21:02, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Okidoki
–Krinkletalk 00:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Okidoki
Why not move your files to Wikisource?
[edit]The files you have downloaded to Wikipedia Commons are not graphic files, but rather scans of books. Why not move them to Wikisource?--QuodvultDeus (talk) 11:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- WikimediaCommons is a platform for any media files, not only for graphics and pictures. This is the reason, why there are already much more than 10,000 files on Commons, which are scans of books. It would be quite irrational to remove all these files to Wikisource. --Moros (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Emanuel_Kotzian_(2009).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MisterTS (talk) 17:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Category:Zeichen 206 (and a few others)
[edit]Category discussion notification | Category:Zeichen 206 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
Docu at 15:34, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Untereschenbach_Kirche_3284.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Reinhardhauke (talk) 16:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:19, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Wappen von Burgthann.png was uncategorized on 7 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Baden im Argöw (Merian).jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Palatinatus Rheni (Merian) b 133.jpg
[edit]Was soll diese Änderung, es fehlt jetzt die Hälfte. Bitte mach es rückgängig oder bitte jemanden der sich damit auskennt um die Änderung. Hinter dem ganzen ist eine Systematik. Du kannst mich aich gerne aud Ws ansprechen. --87.176.170.51 23:17, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Moros, schau mal bitte auf die Disku des Bildes. Darüber hinaus ist mir aus der Beschreibung nicht ganz klar, ob sich die Autorenangabe "Karl Gritschke" auf das Gemälde oder auf das Foto davon bezieht. --Túrelio (talk) 08:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Holzheim has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
SteMicha (talk) 10:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Eurasburg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
SteMicha (talk) 10:43, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Brockelmann_Syrgrammatik_003.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
De728631 (talk) 21:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Altendorf has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
89.244.170.171 15:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Kastl has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
79.217.178.153 08:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Fehler
[edit]Hallo!
Hier hast du den Lizenzbaustein entfernt. Ich nehme an, dass dies aus Versehen passierte. Die Folge dafür könnten aber dennoch gravierend sein, wenn jemand ohne die "History" zu prüfen diese Datei als lizenzlos markiert.
Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 19:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Moros, hier fehlt noch die Angabe des Bildhauers. Das ist bei FOP-Nutzung notwendig. --Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hab ich gerade recherchiert und nachgetragen. --Moros (talk) 16:31, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Gut. Wenn du noch mehr von dem hast, dann könnte man auch eine Kat. Udo Buley anlegen. --Túrelio (talk) 16:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hab ich. Der Kerl ist genial! --Moros (talk) 21:44, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Gut. Wenn du noch mehr von dem hast, dann könnte man auch eine Kat. Udo Buley anlegen. --Túrelio (talk) 16:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:55, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:01, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Phoenix Barnstar! |
|
Talkback
[edit]![]() |
Hello, AlexanderRahm. You have new messages at Funfood's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
![]() |
Archdiocese of Freiburg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Schubbay (talk) 12:53, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Churches in Archdiocese of Freiburg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Schubbay (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Bilder Merkendorf?
[edit]Hallo, hast du Bilder von Merkendorf Mfr. bspw. für die Liste der Baudenkmäler in Merkendorf (Mittelfranken)? Oder kannst du welche machen ? 94.219.66.95 18:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Beschreibung der Röhne und der darauf liegenden Ortschaften Frankenheim und Birx.pdf
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Beschreibung der Röhne und der darauf liegenden Ortschaften Frankenheim und Birx.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Beytrag zur Geschichte der Hexenprocesse in Franken.pdf
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Beytrag zur Geschichte der Hexenprocesse in Franken.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Die große Brauerey zu Burgfahrenbach.pdf
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Die große Brauerey zu Burgfahrenbach.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Denniss (talk) 11:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Wense
[edit]Hallo Moros, kannst du mir evtl. sagen, um welches Wense es sich bei dieser Abbildung handelt? Gruß --Hydro (talk) 21:13, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mar Isaacus Ninivita - De Perfectione Religiosa.pdf
[edit]For some reason I am not able to download the .pdf file of Mar Isaacus Ninivita, De Perfectione Religiosa. I was wondering if you can send me the file via email. I am writing a paper about on Isaac of Nineveh, On the Ascetical Life and I want to look at the original Syriac. Thank you, I'd really appreciate it.
Dekanatsbezirke der ELKB.png
[edit]Hallo Moros, die Dekanatsbezirke der ELKB ist eine super Karte; danke dafür. Leider nicht mehr ganz aktuell. Kreisdekan heißt mittlerweile Regionalbischof und die Dekanate Kronach und Ludwigstadt sind mittlerweile zusammengelegt. Grüsse --Tilman2007 (talk) 14:56, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Ja, die Vorlage für die Karte ist grob geschätzt Ende 90er Jahre. Was Aktuelleres habe ich leider nicht gefunden. Ich werde das mal mit GIMB ändern. --Moros (talk) 18:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:Wappen von Mettenheim.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fränsmer (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Wappen Landkreis Neustadt an der Weinstraße.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fränsmer (talk) 12:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Statt Krainburg (Merian).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 19:51, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Bad Neustadt 341.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Mystic_Treatises
[edit]Apropos https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Mystic_Treatises - did you/will you upload them? It doesn't look like it. It's OK to do so now. Please let me know. After a bunch of work, I finally got 540 files restored, so these should be restorable if needed, but PNGs would be better... --Elvey (talk) 21:48, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- I have uploaded a .pdf-file of Mystic Treatises ([1]) --Moros (talk) 11:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Langenloh 0332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
File:Tauler Predigten (1522) 317.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— billinghurst sDrewth 11:21, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Wappen Traitsching.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 01:08, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Mestlin Kirche.gif
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Mestlin Kirche.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Schloss Linderhof (Schlafzimmer).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ronhjones (Talk) 18:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
St. Georgen Bayreuth has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
--El Grafo (talk) 15:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikidata
[edit]Hallo AlexanderRahm, ich habe deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht, weil die Einbindung mittlerweile über Wikidata realisiert wird. Die Anordnung eines gesonderten Links im Quelltext ist nur noch im Ausnahmefall notwendig und bei deinen Kategorieneuanlagen auch überflüssig. Einfach Kategorie anlegen, auf der linken Leiste unten „Links hinzufügen“ auswählen und im dann erscheinenden Fenster „deu“ für deutsche Wikipedia und in der Zeile darunter den Artikelnamen eingeben. Bei Fragen kannst du dich gern an mich wenden. Viele Grüße, --Giorgio Michele (talk) 07:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Wappen Barbing.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
109.238.80.85 15:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Geschichte des im Monat Julius dieses Jahres 1791 zu Wirzburg ergangenen Bücherverbotes.pdf
[edit]![]() |
File:Geschichte des im Monat Julius dieses Jahres 1791 zu Wirzburg ergangenen Bücherverbotes.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.53.191.10 13:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Geschichte des im Monat Julius dieses Jahres 1791 zu Wirzburg ergangenen Bücherverbotes.pdf
[edit]![]() |
File:Geschichte des im Monat Julius dieses Jahres 1791 zu Wirzburg ergangenen Bücherverbotes.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.53.191.10 13:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyright
[edit]Guten Tag! Ich hoffe, dass Ihr Englisch besser ist als mein Deutsch! Ich pflegte, in Wiesbaden zu leben - liebte es - und lernte Deutschen nicht schlecht zurück dann! Aber ich habe den grössten Teil davon jetzt vergessen. Jedenfalls, es ist nicht zur Sache gehörig - Ihr Name ist auf einem Bild von Julius Wellhausen an Wikipedia Bürgerlichen, und ich gebrauchte(benutzte) es im Artikel(Ding) Biblische Kritik. Der Artikel(Ding) geht FAC durch, und ein commenter hat when gefragt und wo wurde es zuerst(erstens) veröffentlicht? Der gegenwärtige US-Zipfel stellt fest, dass es vor 1923 veröffentlicht wurde, so dass wir dass bestätigen müssen. bin ich eine Bild-Kindergärtnerin. Ich habe keinen Anhaltspunkt überhaupt, wie man diese Information erlangt. Ich war von Hoffen von Ihnen freundlich entweder hatte es oder konnte mir erzählen wo zu gehen, und was ich tun muß, um es zu finden. Das konnte zu Fehlschlag an FAC führen, wenn ich das nicht ausrechnen kann. Helfen Sie bitte! Danke danke danke! Jenhawk777 (talk) 18:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- I only edited the picture. It isn't necessary to mention my name.--AlexanderRahm (talk) 10:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Internal Category as counter
[edit]Ich hoffe hier um eine Hilfe zu Kategorien. Ich habe heute meine Bilder aus der WLM 2018 in eine Kategorie gesteckt, wie die Jahre zuvor. Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2018_DE-BY_HaJN - Die Kategorie macht aber mehr als Versteckte Kategorie Sinn, ist ja nur ein Zähler (Bilder von mir für die WLM im Jahr 20xx), ich habe es nicht gefunden (geschafft) das umzusetzen. Kann mir das einer zeigen oder ändern? Besten Dankǃ --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:23, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Burg Salzburg 347.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Castillo blanco (talk) 06:58, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop
[edit]![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Gsam_want_gnu_big.jpg/220px-Gsam_want_gnu_big.jpg)
Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll.
Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)
Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:45, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Waldstetten has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Flussar (talk) 19:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Friedewald.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GerritR (talk) 20:22, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Oberau Wappen.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 21:42, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Stadtwappen der kreisfreien Stadt Oberhausen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Glorious 93 (talk) 21:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Nachkategorisierungen
[edit]Danke Alexander für das nachkategorisiren der von mir erstellten Orts-Commonscats und der Dateien 🎖! --Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 17:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Neuenried
[edit]Hallo, AlexanderRahm! Ich finde keine Bestätigung, dass der Ortsteil der Gemeinde Ronsberg "Neuried" heißt und nicht "Neuenried": https://www.freistaat.bayern/dokumente/behoerde/13663421700/ortsteile --Veliensis (talk) 21:39, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe mich an Wikipedia-DE orientiert. Dort steht fälschlicherweise Neuried. Kategorie ist umbenannt.--AlexanderRahm (talk) 14:54, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 16:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Lucern (Merian).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Hallo Alexander könntest du bitte so nett sein meine vorbereitende Sammlungs-Unterkategorien für meine umfangreiche Fototour am 7. Oktober nachkategorisieren, du weißt sicher besser welche noch fehlen, vielen Dank im voraus, herzliche Grüße Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 19:40, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Plursium (Merian).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 09:35, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Franziskus Neuendettelsau 0191.JPG
- File:Franziskus Neuendettelsau 0200.jpg
- File:Franziskus Neuendettelsau 0206.jpg
- File:Franziskus Neuendettelsau Ambo 0185.jpg
- File:Franziskus Neuendettelsau Engelsturz0186.jpg
- File:Franziskus Neuendettelsau Tabernakel 0195.jpg
- File:Sankt Franziskus Neuendettelsau 0162.jpg
Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)